[EMAIL] Tests keep failing on Jenkins

2017-01-02 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, there is a failing test on Jenkins [1]. The test checks whether the name of an attachment can be found in the messages body: Expected: a string containing "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Test_Attachment_-_a>=E4,_o>=F6,_u>=FC,_au>=E4u?=" However this string is not contained like this in the message body.

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-email » Apache Commons Email #5

2017-01-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-email #5

2017-01-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-email » Apache Commons Email #4

2017-01-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-email #4

2017-01-02 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [text] TEXT-36 (Was: [text] 1.0 release progress)

2017-01-02 Thread Gary Gregory
On Jan 2, 2017 6:32 AM, "Rob Tompkins" wrote: Regarding Gilles’ last comment asking on why I think we should hold off on putting this functionality in. It seems that we have a lively bit of discourse here over the different varieties of offering the consumer the best options as to how to provide

Re: [TEXT] Pull WordUtils from 1.0?

2017-01-02 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Duncan Jones wrote: > > > >> On 2 Jan 2017, at 19:34, Rob Tompkins wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 2, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Duncan Jones wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I'm currently refactoring WordUtils into several classes containing >>> instance methods. >> >> An

Re: [TEXT] Pull WordUtils from 1.0?

2017-01-02 Thread Duncan Jones
> On 2 Jan 2017, at 19:34, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > >> On Jan 2, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Duncan Jones wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm currently refactoring WordUtils into several classes containing instance >> methods. > > Any rough estimate on timeline (e.g. minutes, hours, days, or weeks)? >

Re: [TEXT] Pull WordUtils from 1.0?

2017-01-02 Thread Pascal Schumacher
+1 to removing it from 1.0 I think releasing it in 1.0 when we already know that we will deprecate it in 1.1 or 1.2 is bad style. Especially considering that, as far as I know, the 1.0 version would be identical to the commons-lang version. Am 02.01.2017 um 19:32 schrieb Duncan Jones: Hi all

Re: [TEXT] Pull WordUtils from 1.0?

2017-01-02 Thread Rob Tompkins
> On Jan 2, 2017, at 1:32 PM, Duncan Jones wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm currently refactoring WordUtils into several classes containing instance > methods. Any rough estimate on timeline (e.g. minutes, hours, days, or weeks)? -Rob > > Should we pull it from 1.0 to avoid releasing it in 1.0

[TEXT] Pull WordUtils from 1.0?

2017-01-02 Thread Duncan Jones
Hi all, I'm currently refactoring WordUtils into several classes containing instance methods. Should we pull it from 1.0 to avoid releasing it in 1.0 and deprecating in 1.1 or 1.2? Duncan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs

Re: [text] TEXT-36 (Was: [text] 1.0 release progress)

2017-01-02 Thread sebb
On 2 January 2017 at 14:32, Rob Tompkins wrote: > Regarding Gilles’ last comment asking on why I think we should hold off on > putting this functionality in. It seems that we have a lively bit of > discourse here over the different varieties of offering the consumer the best > options as to how

Re: [text] TEXT-36 (Was: [text] 1.0 release progress)

2017-01-02 Thread Rob Tompkins
Regarding Gilles’ last comment asking on why I think we should hold off on putting this functionality in. It seems that we have a lively bit of discourse here over the different varieties of offering the consumer the best options as to how to provide a uniform randomness generator to TEXT. Thus

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons JCS 2.0 Released

2017-01-02 Thread Johannes Weberhofer
Am 30.12.2016 um 14:55 schrieb Thomas Vandahl: The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the availability of: Apache Commons JCS 2.0 Thank you, Thomas! This is a big step forward for JCS users! Johannes PS: https://commons.apache.org/ still shows the old version from 2007 -- Johannes

Re: [text] TEXT-36 (Was: [text] 1.0 release progress)

2017-01-02 Thread sebb
The job of TEXT is to use the provided random source to generate the text output. TEXT should make it easy to use any implementation that provides the range of input values it needs. The choice of random source is up to the user; they are the only ones who know what sort of randomness is needed. T