Hello Ralph, besides the strange .pgp.asc files (and I think some components
don't have that problem) the component releases should not need to actually
delete artifacts in the staged repo when running the documented release
goal/profile.
You can in the POM control what is attached for some plug
Maven is going to publish all the artifacts that are built to the repository.
This isn’t necessarily a bad thing as people can look at them all in one place
during the vote. But after the vote is approved anything that a user wouldn’t
ever want in a maven build should be deleted before the rele
I tested IDEs with a non-standard packaging of -sources.jar; java sources were
inside of src/main/java/ folder.
- Eclipse was able to use.
- IntelliJ was able to use with a few extra clicks.
- Netbeans was NOT able to use.
I don’t think this option should be pursued further.
A better alternative
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Gary Gregory"
Date: Dec 19, 2016 5:15 AM
Subject: [REPORT] Commons - December 2016
To: "Apache Board"
Cc:
## Description:
The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
components.
The Apache Commons components are widely used i
On Dec 24, 2016 9:16 AM, "Gilles" wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:06:46 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2016 8:21 AM, "Gilles" wrote:
>
> Hi Gary.
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:09 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the information
>> a
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:06:46 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Dec 24, 2016 8:21 AM, "Gilles"
wrote:
Hi Gary.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:09 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the
information
about Commons Math into the health section which I feel
On Dec 24, 2016 8:21 AM, "Gilles" wrote:
Hi Gary.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:09 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the information
> about Commons Math into the health section which I feel is more
> appropriate. I'll send this in very soon.
>
D
Hi Gary.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:09 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the
information
about Commons Math into the health section which I feel is more
appropriate. I'll send this in very soon.
Did you send a final version? [I didn't see a copy
GitHub user KyongSik-Yoon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-bcel/pull/12
BCEL-276 LocalVariableTypeTable is not updated.
@britter I was fixed the problem reported by Mark Robert.
This PR include small change.
You can merge this pull request into a Git rep
Hi all
as far as I can tell there has benver been a vote for RC2 but the tag
exists, therefore I went with RC3
Parent 42 RC3 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/commons-parent/42-RC3/
(svn revision 17566)
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.or
On 2016-12-23, Charles Honton wrote:
> Unfortunately, I have reverted that change for the moment.
Many thanks.
With that out of the way I'll try to release parent 42 and we can go
from there with the next parent if we wanted to change the release
process.
Stefan
---
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Bernd Eckenfels
[snip]
>> Can you name a component where this is true? Afaik all Commons
>> components have a full featured source archive which is buildable and a
>> limited source attachment for maven.
>>
>
> That true, the whole point o
Hi Charles,
Charles Honton wrote:
> I am incorrect about the contents of the sources zip. It does contain
> all the files under source control.
>
> As a test, I replaced
> ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.5/commons-lang3-3.5-
src.jar
??
The default release profile of Maven
13 matches
Mail list logo
