Hello,
I understand the dist module as preparing the artifacts for the binary and
source distribution of the ASF download. And I agree that those target files
must not be attached to the maven repository. As such the POM can be changed to
a POM only module (or manually removed from the repo). I
sebb wrote:
On 22 May 2016 at 03:54, Josh Elser wrote:
> It's not a problem, it's an inconvenience.
>
> Ideally, Maven builds the artifacts with the intended names. This creates
> consistency through every VOTE message, xsum/sig verification automation,
> website links, and dist.a.o files.
Done. Thank you for the ping.
Gary
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> any chance somebody can take a look at:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-347
> The patch is attached and it is a pretty trivial one.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> -
I just added a little more "docs" in revision 1745267. Awaiting feedback.
Gary
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> These files were discussed here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-175
>
> I never got a reply IIRC from FERC, see the above link for my
+1
>From src zip: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.
Also src tar gz: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.
>From src zip: mvn clean site OK.
All reports OK except Checkstyle:
I assume the Checkstyle violations are not new compared to 1.3.1. I cannot
tell because our site is for 1.4-SNAPSHOT
https://commons.apache.org/proper/com
Hi All:
These files were discussed here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-175
I never got a reply IIRC from FERC, see the above link for my email.
So we decided to ship the files in the configuration as they still are in
1.4-RC1.
I looks like we want to do it differently now, so:
-
I am canceling this vote due to the NOTICE issue.
Gary
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> On 23 May 2016 at 06:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC1 is available for review here:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/csv/1.4-RC1/
> >
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Moving this away from the vote thread...
>
> I'm pretty sure we've already discussed the problem with the ferc.gov file
> but I can't find a reference in the archives. Can anybody help?
> I agree with Stian, that we should better d
Hi!
any chance somebody can take a look at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-347
The patch is attached and it is a pretty trivial one.
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
F
It has been a long time since the last release of Apache Commons
FileUpload, so I'd like to release Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 based on
RC1.
Apache Commons FileUpload 1.3.2 RC1 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/fileupload (rev 13750)
Maven artifac
On 23 May 2016 at 15:14, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Moving this away from the vote thread...
>
> I'm pretty sure we've already discussed the problem with the ferc.gov file
> but I can't find a reference in the archives. Can anybody help?
> I agree with Stian, that we should better document t
Hi,
Moving this away from the vote thread...
I'm pretty sure we've already discussed the problem with the ferc.gov file
but I can't find a reference in the archives. Can anybody help?
I agree with Stian, that we should better document this.
I'm not sure whether this is a blocker, since 1.3 has be
On 23 May 2016 at 06:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Apache Commons CSV 1.4 RC1 is available for review here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/csv/1.4-RC1/
> (revision 13733)
I assume you mean
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/csv/CSV_1_4_RC1/ (@13733)
My vote: -1 due
Stian Soiland-Reyes schrieb am Mo., 23. Mai 2016 um
09:34 Uhr:
> On 23 May 2016 3:42 a.m., "Chen, Haifeng" wrote:
> >
> > So how about we go to the process of ECCN 5D002 self-classify category
> and registration like Taverna did?
>
> Agree on your evaluation, so ECCN 5D002 is good. This makes th
On 23 May 2016 3:42 a.m., "Chen, Haifeng" wrote:
>
> So how about we go to the process of ECCN 5D002 self-classify category
and registration like Taverna did?
Agree on your evaluation, so ECCN 5D002 is good. This makes things a lot
easier! :)
Let's create a Jira issue to track the categorisation
15 matches
Mail list logo