[math] RealMatrixPreservingVisitor and RealMatrixChangingVisitor the same?

Hi, RealMatrixPreservingVisitor and RealMatrixChangingVisitor files look identical with the exception of a single @see Default... annotation (Which I think is redundant...same as > All known implementing classes...?). Would it make sense to remove the annotation and have one RealMatrixChangin

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

On 12/29/2015 07:39 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two > points I wanted to address before that, both related to > ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods > stability issues have been fixed, and a bunch a field-based > i

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

Le 29/12/2015 20:48, Phil Steitz a écrit : > > >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two points I >> wanted to address before that, both related to ODE. These points >> are now completed: the Adams me

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

> On Dec 29, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two > points I wanted to address before that, both related to > ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods > stability issues have been fixed, and a bunch a f

Re: [math] releasing 3.6

I'm all for RERO. Gary On Dec 29, 2015 10:39 AM, "Luc Maisonobe" wrote: > Hi all, > > A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two > points I wanted to address before that, both related to > ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods > stability issues have been fixed,

[math] releasing 3.6

Hi all, A few weeks ago, I proposed to release 3.6. There were two points I wanted to address before that, both related to ODE. These points are now completed: the Adams methods stability issues have been fixed, and a bunch a field-based integrators are available. There are 3 issues in JIRA that

Re: [Math] About the refactoring of RNGs

hi all, Le 29/12/2015 18:32, Phil Steitz a écrit : > > >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Gilles >> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:33:24 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/28/15 8:08 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:08:56 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: The > significant refac

Re: [Math] About the refactoring of RNGs

> On Dec 29, 2015, at 8:41 AM, Gilles wrote: > >> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:33:24 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 12/28/15 8:08 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:08:56 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: The significant refactoring to eliminate the (standard) next(int) included in the

Re: [Math] About the refactoring of RNGs

On 12/29/2015 05:10 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:33:15 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Le 29/12/2015 09:21, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >>> On 12/29/2015 04:33 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/28/15 8:08 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:08:56 -0700, Phil Stei

Re: [Math] About the refactoring of RNGs (Was: [01/18] [math] MATH-1307)

On 12/29/15 2:33 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > Le 29/12/2015 09:21, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : >> On 12/29/2015 04:33 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 12/28/15 8:08 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:08:56 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > The significant refactoring to eliminate the

Re: [Math] About the refactoring of RNGs

On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 10:33:15 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, Le 29/12/2015 09:21, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : On 12/29/2015 04:33 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/28/15 8:08 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:08:56 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: The significant refactoring to eliminate the (s

Re: [Math] About the refactoring of RNGs

On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 20:33:24 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/28/15 8:08 PM, Gilles wrote: On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:08:56 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: The significant refactoring to eliminate the (standard) next(int) included in these changes has the possibility of introducing subtle bugs or performa

Early Access builds b99 for JDK 9 & build b96 for JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw are available on java.net

Hi Benedikt, Early Access b99 for JDK 9 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here . Early Access b96 for JDK 9 with

Re: [Math] About the refactoring of RNGs (Was: [01/18] [math] MATH-1307)

Hi all, Le 29/12/2015 09:21, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 12/29/2015 04:33 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 12/28/15 8:08 PM, Gilles wrote: >>> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:08:56 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: The significant refactoring to eliminate the (standard) next(int) included in these changes

Re: [Math] About the refactoring of RNGs (Was: [01/18] [math] MATH-1307)

On 12/29/2015 04:33 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 12/28/15 8:08 PM, Gilles wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 11:08:56 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> The significant refactoring to eliminate the (standard) next(int) >>> included in these changes has the possibility of introducing subtle >>> bugs or perform