Re: Design guidelines and SemVer

Hello Peter 2015-02-15 22:49 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell : > On 15 February 2015 at 21:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > > We like to underline, that we have no experience with the RDF > > specification. From a technical point of view we can help to develop the > > proposed API (according to our desi

Re: svn commit: r1659973 [1/3] - in /commons/sandbox/rdf/trunk: ./ api/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/ impl.sparql/ impl.sparql/src/ impl.sparql/src/main/ impl.sparql/src/main/java/ impl.sparql/

2015-02-17 0:13 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell : > Hi Bernard, > > The Commons RDF project is not planning on including any non-trivial > implementations, to avoid bias towards any of the participating > platforms. Stian has written a trivial implementation and submitted it > to GitHub to provide a refere

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

Quite a few bugs have been fixed since DBCP 2.0.1 and a few new features have been added. It is time for a 2.1 release. The release is available for review here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/dbcp (r8031) The release was built from this tag: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/

Re: svn commit: r1659973 [1/3] - in /commons/sandbox/rdf/trunk: ./ api/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/rdf/ impl.sparql/ impl.sparql/src/ impl.sparql/src/main/ impl.sparql/src/main/java/ impl.sparql/

Hi Bernard, The Commons RDF project is not planning on including any non-trivial implementations, to avoid bias towards any of the participating platforms. Stian has written a trivial implementation and submitted it to GitHub to provide a reference for our test harness, but it is never planned to

Re: [math] Create 3.5 branch, update trunk to 4.0

On 02/10/2015 09:49 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi all, > > there was some discussion about this a while ago, and it seemed that > there was consensus to do as written in the subject. > > If there are no objections, then I will soon do the change (including > the update of package / maven artifa

Re: [DBCP] tomcat / JNDI users - pls review DBCP-435 changes

On 16/02/2015 20:28, Phil Steitz wrote: > I think the idea in this issue / patch is good - warn users when > they are specifying obsolete or unknown properties in JNDI references. > > I tested with tc 8 trunk and apart from the formatting changes I put > into the patch (and suppressed redundant st

[DBCP] tomcat / JNDI users - pls review DBCP-435 changes

I think the idea in this issue / patch is good - warn users when they are specifying obsolete or unknown properties in JNDI references. I tested with tc 8 trunk and apart from the formatting changes I put into the patch (and suppressed redundant stderr writes), output looks similar to what is in t

Re: svn commit: r1658276 - in /commons/proper/csv/trunk: pom.xml src/test/java/org/apache/commons/csv/CSVBenchmark.java

JMH is a tool used during the build. The source code for the product does not depend on it. See http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited . Ralph > On Feb 15, 2015, at 2:23 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > 2015-02-09 2:40 GMT+01: