[compress] Changes to allow multithreaded creation of zip files

2014-12-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I just thought I'd let you know I'm working on changes to allow multiple threads to output to different ZipArchiveOutputStream instances (backed by commons-io DeferredFileOutputStream or similar) and then stitch the results back together as a single Zip file. I'm currently just researching the sco

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons grants write access to all ASF committers

2014-12-14 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Nice move; This is actually the way I thought commons worked ("when I was a kid") until I learned that I did not understand how commons worked :) Kristian 2014-12-15 6:27 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson : > On Dec 14, 2014 9:04 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: >> >> Nice feedback all around. Here is a versio

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons grants write access to all ASF committers

2014-12-14 Thread Matt Benson
On Dec 14, 2014 9:04 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > > Nice feedback all around. Here is a version that includes some of these > thoughts: > -- > > Dear fellow committers, > > The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce that write access to the > Apache Commons Subversion and Git repositories has b

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons grants write access to all ASF committers

2014-12-14 Thread Gary Gregory
Nice feedback all around. Here is a version that includes some of these thoughts: -- Dear fellow committers, The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce that write access to the Apache Commons Subversion and Git repositories has been granted to all ASF committers. Apache Commons is an Apache

Re: [logging] Commons Logging 2.0?

2014-12-14 Thread Gary Gregory
Rainer, Is there anything on the Log4j 2 side that would make this easier or better? If so, would you be willing to raise a JIRA with Log4j 2. FYI: I am on the Apache Logging PMC and have been quite involved in Log4j 2. Gary On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:38 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > > Am 01.12.2014

Re: [TEXT] Distance vs. Metric vs. Similarity

2014-12-14 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 14/12/2014 21:08, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Distance and similarity seem to be just opposites of the same thing. A > great distance indicates a small similarity between two character > sequences. Metric feels like it's something more general, but I'm not sure. > > WDYT? Return the inverse (

Re: [Math] MATH-1180

2014-12-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 12/14/14 5:10 PM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > Any objection to my adding this: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1180 > ? If you have use for something like that in [math], I am fine with it, but it should be called something else. The name "natural" for the existing method is "natural

[Math] MATH-1180

2014-12-14 Thread Gilles
Hi. Any objection to my adding this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1180 ? Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [TEXT] Distance vs. Metric vs. Similarity

2014-12-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
> Sounds good, although I'm not sure I understand where you are going with> the > marker interface. What is it's purpose? Let's then keep the StringMetric interface and update its Javadoc. Thinking again, that other marker interface seems to be unnecessary.  > Okay, but we need to make sure all

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha2 based on RC1

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hey Oliver, 2014-12-14 22:25 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger : > > My own +1. > > Seems to be no good time for a vote... > It's holiday time, so... :o) I will have some time on Tuesday evening to review this RC. One thing already caught my eye: The Clirr report compares with alpha2-SNAPSHOT. Can you conf

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha2 based on RC1

2014-12-14 Thread Oliver Heger
My own +1. Seems to be no good time for a vote... Oliver Am 12.12.2014 um 21:38 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > this is a vote for the second alpha version of [configuration] 2.0 based > on the first release candidate. After the first alpha version, a couple > of enhancement requests have b

Re: [TEXT] Distance vs. Metric vs. Similarity

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Bruna, 2014-12-14 21:37 GMT+01:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita : > > Hello Benedikt! > > Metric feels like it's something more general, but I'm not sure. > You're right. Metric was supposed to be a general interface, > representing the String Metric from the Wikipedia article. > > and the interface fr

Re: [TEXT] Distance vs. Metric vs. Similarity

2014-12-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hello Benedikt! > Metric feels like it's something more general, but I'm not sure. You're right. Metric was supposed to be a general interface, representing the String Metric from the Wikipedia article. >  and the interface from StringMetric to StringDistance. I'm reading the Myers paper, and alre

Re: [text] Update .gitignore, using [lang]'s as basis

2014-12-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Good point Benedikt! Changes reverted! Thank you! https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-text.git;a=commitdiff;h=37c78040 From: Benedikt Ritter To: Commons Developers List ; Bruno P. Kinoshita Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2014 6:10 PM Subject: Re: [text] Update .gitignore,

Re: [TEXT] Distance vs. Metric vs. Similarity

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014-12-14 21:08 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter : > > Hi, > > currently the wording in commons text is a bit confusing. We have the > three terms: > > - distance > - similarity > - metric > > Distance and similarity seem to be just opposites of the same thing. A > great distance indicates a small simila

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons grants write access to all ASF committers

2014-12-14 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 12:57:02 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: On 12/14/14 12:49 PM, Gilles wrote: On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:28:37 +0100, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hi all, here is my draft for the announcement to committers@ Regards, Benedikt -- Dear fellow committers, the Apache Commons Team is ple

Re: [text] Update .gitignore, using [lang]'s as basis

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014-12-14 20:54 GMT+01:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita : > > +1 Benedikt! > Just learned that I can have a global .gitignore :-) > For others that didn't know, here's what I read to grok it. > https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files/ > > @Benedikt, should we delete the .gitignore then or revert to w

[TEXT] Distance vs. Metric vs. Similarity

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, currently the wording in commons text is a bit confusing. We have the three terms: - distance - similarity - metric Distance and similarity seem to be just opposites of the same thing. A great distance indicates a small similarity between two character sequences. Metric feels like it's somet

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons grants write access to all ASF committers

2014-12-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 12/14/14 12:49 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:28:37 +0100, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> here is my draft for the announcement to committers@ >> >> Regards, >> Benedikt >> >> -- >> >> Dear fellow committers, >> >> the Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce that writ

Re: [text] Update .gitignore, using [lang]'s as basis

2014-12-14 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
+1 Benedikt! Just learned that I can have a global .gitignore :-) For others that didn't know, here's what I read to grok it. https://help.github.com/articles/ignoring-files/ @Benedikt, should we delete the .gitignore then or revert to what it was? ThanksBurno From: Benedikt Ritter To: C

Re: [text] SANDBOX-483 Add changes and fix old Javadocs from [lang] that remained after the code porting

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014-12-13 4:21 GMT+01:00 : > > Repository: commons-text > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master 87b789fbe -> 7570eb016 > > > SANDBOX-483 Add changes and fix old Javadocs from [lang] that remained > after the code porting > > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-text/repo > C

Re: [DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons grants write access to all ASF committers

2014-12-14 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:28:37 +0100, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hi all, here is my draft for the announcement to committers@ Regards, Benedikt -- Dear fellow committers, the Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce that write access to the Apache Commons SVN and git repositories has been

Re: [text] Update .gitignore, using [lang]'s as basis

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
I know we have this in lang's .gitignore. I've added that back when I didn't know git too well. Today I tend to say that this does not belong into a project's .gitignore. Ignores for tooling have to go to your global gitignore imho. WDYT? Benedikt 2014-12-13 4:22 GMT+01:00 : > > Repository: comm

Re: [logging] Commons Logging 2.0?

2014-12-14 Thread Rainer Jung
Am 01.12.2014 um 14:31 schrieb Gary Gregory: FWIW, I think a new version of CL would be 'fun' if it included support for Log4j 2... I did an experiment in Tomcat land, because I didn't like the way Log4J version 2 supported commons-logging. Originally if you want to plug log4j version 2 into

Re: commons-parent maven pom highly broken?

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, I've released [lang] a couple of times and have not experienced such issues. Maybe we can meet in IRC and try to sort out the things together? 2014-12-13 19:22 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : > > Just file an JIRA if something doesn't work and you are done. > > > > Releasing is tedious because M

Re: [all] Sonar configuration for Commons components

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Thank you! 2014-12-12 10:37 GMT+01:00 Thomas Neidhart : > > Hi Benedikt, > > it makes only sense to add components that are actively maintained and the > maintainers are interested in the reports imho. > > I think I can create an account for you for sonar and its associated > jenkins instance, wil

[DRAFT][ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons grants write access to all ASF committers

2014-12-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi all, here is my draft for the announcement to committers@ Regards, Benedikt -- Dear fellow committers, the Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce that write access to the Apache Commons SVN and git repositories has been granted to all ASF committers. Apache Commons is an Apache pro

Re: [Math] Add another backup extension to ".gitignore"?

2014-12-14 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 20:11:29 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 14/12/2014 19:12, Gilles a écrit : Hello. Could I commit an addition to ".gitignore", namely assuming that files ending with a tilde character ("~") are backup created by some editors? Sure you can. OK, done! Gilles ---

Re: [Math] Add another backup extension to ".gitignore"?

2014-12-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 14/12/2014 19:12, Gilles a écrit : > Hello. > > Could I commit an addition to ".gitignore", namely assuming that > files ending with a tilde character ("~") are backup created by > some editors? Sure you can. best regards, Luc > > > Regards, > Gilles > > > ---

Re: [math] preparing release 3.4 ?

2014-12-14 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:01:42 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 14/12/2014 02:16, Gilles a écrit : On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 21:51:30 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to push version 3.4 soon. There are 3 remaining issues in JIRA. I propose to postpone 1066 to next version as there are

[Math] Add another backup extension to ".gitignore"?

2014-12-14 Thread Gilles
Hello. Could I commit an addition to ".gitignore", namely assuming that files ending with a tilde character ("~") are backup created by some editors? Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.or

Re: [math] preparing release 3.4 ?

2014-12-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 12/14/14 9:41 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:01:42 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 14/12/2014 02:16, Gilles a écrit : >>> On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 21:51:30 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to push version 3.4 soon. There are 3 remaining issues in

Re: [math] preparing release 3.4 ?

2014-12-14 Thread Gilles
On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 13:01:42 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 14/12/2014 02:16, Gilles a écrit : On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 21:51:30 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi all, I would like to push version 3.4 soon. There are 3 remaining issues in JIRA. I propose to postpone 1066 to next version as there are

Re: [math] preparing release 3.4 ?

2014-12-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 12/13/14 1:51 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to push version 3.4 soon. > > There are 3 remaining issues in JIRA. I propose to postpone 1066 to next > version as there are no news of the original poster about refactoring > the patch. I did the refactoring and have it about r

Re: [math] preparing release 3.4 ?

2014-12-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 14/12/2014 02:16, Gilles a écrit : > On Sat, 13 Dec 2014 21:51:30 +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I would like to push version 3.4 soon. >> >> There are 3 remaining issues in JIRA. I propose to postpone 1066 to next >> version as there are no news of the original poster about refact