On 11/4/14 9:08 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 04/11/2014 15:55, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit :
>
>> Any feedback welcome.
> Hi Jochen,
>
> I'm not a dependency injection expert so I can't really comment on the
> design, I could just make trivial observations like the use of the 'I'
> prefix for the int
Le 8 nov. 2014 19:51, "Oliver Heger" a écrit
:
>
> Hi Jochen,
>
> do you intend to position this framework for specific use cases? In
> which way is it different or special from other implementations?
>
> Just as one example: In the company I am working for, we are using CDI
> in a pretty large JS
Hi Jochen,
do you intend to position this framework for specific use cases? In
which way is it different or special from other implementations?
Just as one example: In the company I am working for, we are using CDI
in a pretty large JSE application. Due to the huge class path the setup
of the CDI
Le 08/11/2014 02:42, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Thoughts?
+1
Emmanuel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Go for it!
Send from my mobile device
> Am 08.11.2014 um 04:44 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> I'm going with 1.1 because there are new APIs.
>
> Gary
>
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Dan Tran wrote:
>>
>> should it be 1.0.1? since it is just for bug fixes
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> -D
>>
>> On Fr
