On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 26/09/2014 23:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> > -1 (sorry). With the source zip, I ran 'mvn clean site' and got:
>
> But we are releasing a source zip to build a jar, not a site.
> Seriously... that shouldn't block a release.
>
I see it di
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The second release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny.
>
> Tag:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC2/
> (r1627879)
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> I would like to release the [weaver] component.
>
> Apache Commons Weaver 1.1 RC3 is available for review at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/weaver/ (r6646).
>
> Maven artifacts are at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/con
Le 24/09/2014 16:30, Matt Benson a écrit :
> [X] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +0 OK, but...
> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 26/09/2014 23:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Also Cobertura blows up (i'm not sure Jacoco would fare better but it might
> be worth a try):
Cobertura works fine if executed with 'mvn cobertura:cobertura'. I don't
know why it fails with 'mvn site'. I'll ensure the correct report is
uploaded on th
Le 26/09/2014 23:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> -1 (sorry). With the source zip, I ran 'mvn clean site' and got:
But we are releasing a source zip to build a jar, not a site.
Seriously... that shouldn't block a release.
Emmanuel Bourg
--
Also, the checkstyle reports do not like the headers:
Line does not match expected header line of ' * Unless required by
applicable law or agreed to in writing, software'.
There are many checkstyle issues reported but I am not sure that is any
worse thank before.
PMD has many: Avoid modifiers whi
-1 (sorry). With the source zip, I ran 'mvn clean site' and got:
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 03:33 min
[INFO] Finished at: 201
Hi all,
The second release candidate of BCEL is ready to pass under your scrutiny.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/bcel/tags/BCEL_6_0_RC2/
(r1627879)
Release notes:
http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/bcel/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Distribution files:
http://people.apache.org/~ebourg/b
Thank you Gary, I confirm it works.
Emmanuel
Le 26/09/2014 21:27, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> I see this in Log4j 2:
>
>
> org.codehaus.mojo
> findbugs-maven-plugin
> ${findbugs.plugin.version}
>
> true
> -Duser.language=en
> No
On 26 September 2014 14:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Let's also think about what happens when you to an array into a Map.
>
> Does the fact that we are dealing with a reflection hashCode API mean it
> should give the same key that would be used if you put the array in a map?
>
> Gary
Hi Gary, I don'
I see this in Log4j 2:
org.codehaus.mojo
findbugs-maven-plugin
${findbugs.plugin.version}
true
-Duser.language=en
Normal
Default
${log4jParentDir}/findbugs-exclude-filter.xml
Gary
On Thu, Sep 25, 201
Let's also think about what happens when you to an array into a Map.
Does the fact that we are dealing with a reflection hashCode API mean it
should give the same key that would be used if you put the array in a map?
Gary
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:10 AM, Michael Pigott <
mpigott.subscripti...@gm
Hi Duncan,
Does it make sense to create a method specifically for array types,
which calls reflectonHashCode on each element to compute a final hash code?
This would solve the poster's problem and avoid polluting
reflectionHashCode with the behavior.
Regards,
Mike
On Sep 26, 2014 6:32 AM, "Dun
Hi folks,
I'd welcome someone else's viewpoint on LANG-1039. The question is: what
should HashCodeBuilder.reflectionHashCode() do when given an array object
as input.
My argument is that the intended use of this method is for overriding
Object.hashCode() and so it should never be the case than an
15 matches
Mail list logo
