On 07/05/2014 08:37 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Logging 1.2 based on RC2.
>
> Changes since RC2:
>
> * added pmd.xml to the source distribution
> * added README.txt which describes how to properly build logging
>
>
> This release drops support for Java 1.1,
On 07/05/2014 05:42 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Email 1.3.3 based on RC2.
>
> Changes since RC1:
>
> * fix test execution with Java 8
> * fix javadoc generation with Java 8
>
>
> Email 1.3.3 RC2 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos
On 7/8/14, 1:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/07/2014 18:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 7/8/14, 9:46 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2014-07-05 19:54 GMT+04:00 Phil Steitz :
From the looks of [1] and the repo list at [2] it looks like all we
have to do to get started is open an infra JIR
We do have a discrepancy between our format class and lexer (which is
hardwired with CR & LF).
Ideally, it seems the lexer should pickup it's set of EOL Strings from the
format.
I recall reading worries of performance issues changing this but either we
support all of the EOL strings including som
+1
built from source tarball with my compiler zoo (incl. Backdawn JDK 1.4 and
IBM JDK 1.4).
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Logging 1.2 based on RC2.
>
> Changes since RC2:
>
> * added pmd.xml to the source distribution
> * added README.txt which describes how t
+1 (non-binding)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 05 Jul 2014, at 17:42, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Email 1.3.3 based on RC2.
>
> Changes since RC1:
>
> * fix test execution with Java 8
> * fix javadoc generation with Java 8
>
>
> Email 1.3.3 RC2 is available f
+1
built from source tarball with my compiler zoo.
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons Email 1.3.3 based on RC2.
>
> Changes since RC1:
>
> * fix test execution with Java 8
> * fix javadoc generation with Java 8
>
>
> Email 1.3.3 RC2 is available for review here:
>
On 08/07/2014 18:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 7/8/14, 9:46 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2014-07-05 19:54 GMT+04:00 Phil Steitz :
>>> From the looks of [1] and the repo list at [2] it looks like all we
>>> have to do to get started is open an infra JIRA and there should not
>>> be a problem start
On 7/8/14, 9:46 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2014-07-05 19:54 GMT+04:00 Phil Steitz :
>> From the looks of [1] and the repo list at [2] it looks like all we
>> have to do to get started is open an infra JIRA and there should not
>> be a problem starting with [math] by itself. Other commons
>> c
2014-07-05 19:54 GMT+04:00 Phil Steitz :
> From the looks of [1] and the repo list at [2] it looks like all we
> have to do to get started is open an infra JIRA and there should not
> be a problem starting with [math] by itself. Other commons
> components can follow as and when they feel like it.
10 matches
Mail list logo