On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Well ATM log4j2 doesnt work well, didnt get time to dig into it but tested
> last week for another topic and lost all my shutdown messages (guess
> cleanup is called too early).
>
Please to check out trunk and give us some feedback! tru
Well because [logging] was longly broken in a not flat classloading
environment (didnt check last release but almost all logging facade got
this issue at a point) and because almost nothing in TomEE stacks uses it,
it is not as integrated as log4j, slf4j or JUL (which is the default). Main
issue I
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=31793&projectId=65
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 2 Jun 2014 06:20:06 +
Finished at: Mon 2 Jun 2014 06:21:38 +
Total time: 1m 32s
Build Trigger: Schedul
Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
> 1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugEnabled to get a
> if (boolean) complexity and not go through the logging framework which can
> imply several layers (filter, appender, handler, log
Le 02/06/2014 02:36, Konstantin Kolinko a écrit :
> There is a trivial copy-pasted typo in the release notes file: the
> title for 1.9.1 changes on line 66 says "1.9.0".
Fixed, thank you Konstantin.
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubsc
Well ATM log4j2 doesnt work well, didnt get time to dig into it but tested
last week for another topic and lost all my shutdown messages (guess
cleanup is called too early).
3 would be an option if we dont rely on [logging] anymore but the impl
directly which would be a regression IMHO + either wo
Am Sun, 1 Jun 2014 23:43:10 +0100
schrieb sebb :
> On 1 June 2014 20:19, Romain Manni-Bucau
> wrote:
> > well it is for sure thread safe. Not sure I get why final and synch
> > would be mandatory in this particular case (field will maybe be
> > cached by thread but that's not an issue since the v
Hi!
Congratulations on your BeanUtils 1.9.2 release.
There is a trivial copy-pasted typo in the release notes file: the
title for 1.9.1 changes on line 66 says "1.9.0".
I think it is not worth creating a JIRA issue for this.
[[[
Index: RELEASE-NOTES.txt
=
There is also log4j 2.
Gary
Original message From: Romain Manni-Bucau
Date:06/01/2014 15:26 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [jcs] logging
Hi
I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugE
On 1 June 2014 20:26, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
> 1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugEnabled to get a if
> (boolean) complexity and not go through the logging framework which can
> imply several layers (filter, a
On 1 June 2014 20:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> well it is for sure thread safe. Not sure I get why final and synch would be
> mandatory in this particular case (field will maybe be cached by thread but
> that's not an issue since the value will be unique).
non-final fields are not guaranteed t
I have gone through Wikipedia and R functions to get an understanding.
My idea is to come up with different estimation techniques as strategies
(Enums) and constrction inject during percentile object creation.
The evaluate method could then use this estimation tecnhique to complete
the computation
Hi
I have two main point to discuss regarding the logging:
1) LogHelper stuffI committed. Idea was to cache isDebugEnabled to get a if
(boolean) complexity and not go through the logging framework which can
imply several layers (filter, appender, handler, logger...) for nothing and
slow down cachi
well it is for sure thread safe. Not sure I get why final and synch would
be mandatory in this particular case (field will maybe be cached by thread
but that's not an issue since the value will be unique).
I have nothing against a revert/reapply. I'll open a thread on logging btw.
Romain Manni-
On 1 June 2014 18:54, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> 2014-06-01 19:45 GMT+02:00 sebb :
>>
>> PING
>>
>
> Pong, sorry, missed this one.
>
>>
>> On 29 May 2014 03:00, sebb wrote:
>> > On 28 May 2014 18:06, wrote:
>> >> Author: rmannibucau
>> >> Date: Wed May 28 17:06:12 2014
>> >> New Revision: 15
PING
On 29 May 2014 03:00, sebb wrote:
> On 28 May 2014 18:06, wrote:
>> Author: rmannibucau
>> Date: Wed May 28 17:06:12 2014
>> New Revision: 1598071
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1598071
>> Log:
>> using reentrant locks instead of old synchronized
>
> -1
>
> This commit mixes two complet
16 matches
Mail list logo