Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC3 (second run after mail outage)

2014-05-14 Thread sebb
On 14 May 2014 19:18, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 11/05/2014 11:55, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> As I am not sure this message will be recovered after mail outage, I >> send it again, with an update of final date. >> >> I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC3

Re: [lang]

2014-05-14 Thread Ralph Goers
I have to say that if you look at the JDK for examples of how to code Java correctly you will be disappointed. There are lots and lots of classes that are really bad. Ralph On May 6, 2014, at 2:54 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: > This is not a matter of law. If Oracle/Sun set a direction on how t

Re: [lang] Any objections to LANG-1012?

2014-05-14 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, no oppinion if good or bad, just want to point out that typically "largerThan" means x > y and a more common name (think html entity) is "greater than" and "less than". The other (>=, -ge) operator would be greaterOrEqual. Greetings Bernd Am Tue, 13 May 2014 21:06:56 +0100 schrieb Dunc

Re: [CSV] CSVFormat validation - do this earlier?

2014-05-14 Thread sebb
On 13 May 2014 16:53, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > > 2014-05-13 12:06 GMT+02:00 sebb : > >> At present, validate() is not invoked until the format is used. This >> means that invalid arguments are not detected at the point they are >> provided. >> >> It would be possible to run validate as par

Re: [ALL] Missing commit e-mails - INFRA-7716

2014-05-14 Thread sebb
I had not seen that last update. It does look like there are still e-mails in the queue. 6 of the 9 missing commits have now appeared. On 14 May 2014 16:00, Roger Whitcomb wrote: > It might just be that the backlog of emails hasn't cleared yet ... (see : > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/ma

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC3 (second run after mail outage)

2014-05-14 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 11/05/2014 11:55, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > Hi all, > > As I am not sure this message will be recovered after mail outage, I > send it again, with an update of final date. > > I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC3. This vote has passed with the following tally:

Re: [lang] Any objections to LANG-1012?

2014-05-14 Thread Duncan Jones
On 14 May 2014 00:04, Gary Gregory wrote: > IMO toes does not belong in lang. It's too much like the bean validation > framework. It has potential to leak into a giant pile of methods with support > for all doors of objects and data types. > > Providing what java 7 has in Objects should be the l

RE: [ALL] Missing commit e-mails - INFRA-7716

2014-05-14 Thread Roger Whitcomb
It might just be that the backlog of emails hasn't cleared yet ... (see : https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/mail_outage ) They say it could take from 2-5 days after the 10th to get all the backlog delivered ... ~Roger -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Tu

Re: [CSV] CSVFormat validation - do this earlier?

2014-05-14 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, 2014-05-13 12:06 GMT+02:00 sebb : > At present, validate() is not invoked until the format is used. This > means that invalid arguments are not detected at the point they are > provided. > > It would be possible to run validate as part of the withArgument() > methods. This would allow earlie

[RESULT] Release Compress 1.8.1 based on RC1

2014-05-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all with a -1 by Gary Gregory and +1s by Emmanuel Bourg, Luc Maisonobe, Phil Steitz and myself the vote has passed. I'll publish all artefacts and update the site/announce the release after the mirrors had time to catch up. Thanks Stefan -

[lang] Any objections to LANG-1012?

2014-05-14 Thread Duncan Jones
Hi, Does anyone have any objections to me implementing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1012? The goal is to introduce: Validate.isFalse() Validate.largerThan() // isLargerThan() ?? Validate.smallerThan() // isSmallerThan() ?? The isFalse() is just the natural counterpart to isTr

Re: [jcs] What's next?

2014-05-14 Thread Raffaele P. Guidi
Oops, wrong address, sorry :) 2014-05-07 12:03 GMT+02:00 Raffaele P. Guidi : > Talking about next steps, have you ever considered a second level of (off > heap) cache? My question is of course not so casual, being the PMC of > DirectMemory :) I think there are a lot of potential synergies, here.