I tried to build with Java 5 on Windows 8.1, but there were the test
failures below. ISTR that I had similar problems with the last release,
so this might not be a problem.
The clirr report shows some errors, and I did not find a related comment
in the release notes. Is this okay?
Oliver
Results
> On May 6, 2014, at 10:51 PM, Duncan Jones wrote:
>
>> On 7 May 2014 01:52, "Paul Benedict" wrote:
>>
>> When you dereference a null pointer, you get an NPE. We can agree to that.
>> We can also agree it's not inherently wrong to throw IAE on a null
> argument
>> check, but this discussion h
On 7 May 2014 01:52, "Paul Benedict" wrote:
>
> When you dereference a null pointer, you get an NPE. We can agree to that.
> We can also agree it's not inherently wrong to throw IAE on a null
argument
> check, but this discussion has never been about that. The discussion has
> always centered on w
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30673&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 12 May 2014 20:39:12 +
Finished at: Mon 12 May 2014 20:42:57 +
Total time: 3m 45s
Build Trigger: Sche
Hi
why using org.apache.commons.jcs.utils.struct.DoubleLinkedListNode and
not a synchronized java.util.LinkedList ?
BTW I'd be happy if we can get rid of this synchronized structure
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30669&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 12 May 2014 20:00:04 +
Finished at: Mon 12 May 2014 20:04:05 +
Total time: 4m 0s
Build Trigger: Sched
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30668&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 12 May 2014 19:20:41 +
Finished at: Mon 12 May 2014 19:21:40 +
Total time: 58s
Build Trigger: Schedul
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30664&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 12 May 2014 18:20:39 +
Finished at: Mon 12 May 2014 18:21:37 +
Total time: 57s
Build Trigger: Schedul
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30665&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 12 May 2014 19:00:05 +
Finished at: Mon 12 May 2014 19:04:14 +
Total time: 4m 9s
Build Trigger: Sched
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30661&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 12 May 2014 18:00:08 +
Finished at: Mon 12 May 2014 18:04:24 +
Total time: 4m 16s
Build Trigger: Sche
On 5/11/14, 3:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> delayed because I wanted to wait for mails to arrive again.
>
> Compress 1.8.1 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/compress/
> (svn revision 5300)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30657&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 12 May 2014 17:20:40 +
Finished at: Mon 12 May 2014 17:21:35 +
Total time: 54s
Build Trigger: Schedul
+1
-Original Message-
From: Luc Maisonobe [mailto:l...@spaceroots.org]
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 5:56 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Math 3.3 based on RC3 (second run after mail outage)
Hi all,
As I am not sure this message will be recovered after mail outage, I
Hi all,
I would like to call a vote to release Commons Math 3.3 based on RC3.
Changes since RC2:
* reverted javadoc fixes for Java 8
Note:
Commons Math 3.3 does compile with Java 8, but creating the site will
not work due to some incompatibilities:
* javadoc: known doclint issue
* findbugs
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30384&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 7 May 2014 22:21:42 +
Finished at: Wed 7 May 2014 22:25:24 +
Total time: 3m 41s
Build Trigger: Schedu
On 7 May 2014 21:07, "sebb" wrote:
>
> On 7 May 2014 01:51, Paul Benedict wrote:
> > When you dereference a null pointer, you get an NPE. We can agree to
that.
> > We can also agree it's not inherently wrong to throw IAE on a null
argument
> > check, but this discussion has never been about that.
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30380&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 7 May 2014 22:00:04 +
Finished at: Wed 7 May 2014 22:04:16 +
Total time: 4m 11s
Build Trigger: Schedu
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=30400&projectId=286
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Thu 8 May 2014 06:00:03 +
Finished at: Thu 8 May 2014 06:04:56 +
Total time: 4m 52s
Build Trigger: Schedu
18 matches
Mail list logo
