On 2013-12-19, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> ZipArchiveInputStream updates a CRC32 for each entry but the result is
> never used. Any objection to remove it?
Hmm, we also set the CRC on the ZipArchiveEntry so it may be worth to
actually verify it. ZipFile doesn't verify it either, by the way. I'd
pre
On 19 December 2013 00:16, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> ZipArchiveInputStream updates a CRC32 for each entry but the result is
> never used. Any objection to remove it?
Presumably there is a CRC field in the archive against which this
could be checked?
If so, how difficult would it be to
Hi all,
ZipArchiveInputStream updates a CRC32 for each entry but the result is
never used. Any objection to remove it?
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
No, it's not bad for to ask :) it sound like no one has the need for a release.
Are there fixes you are looking for?
Gary
Original message
From: Ryan Hendrickson
Date:12/18/2013 16:53 (GMT-05:00)
To: "'dev@commons.apache.org'"
Subject: [exec] 1.1.1 release?
Sorry if it
Sorry if it's bad form to ask this, but is there any plan for a non-snapshot
release of commons-exec 1.1.1? It looks like the exec subtree hasn't seen any
real development in just over a year, and the 1.1 release was three years ago.
Thanks,
Ryan
This
The Call For Proposals for ApacheCon NA, 2014 will go out in the
next couple of weeks. PMCs have been asked for volunteers for the
Content Committee to review proposals related to their projects.
Before we all rush to raise our hands, we thought it best to get a
sense for what talks might be prop
On 12/18/13, 4:05 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to check what others think about making a 3.3 release in the next
> 1-2 months.
>
> My plans are as follows:
>
> - finish the open documentation / userguide issues over Christmas
> - finish a few of my feature requests for which I ha
Le 18/12/2013 13:05, Thomas Neidhart a écrit :
> Hi,
Hi Thomas,
>
> I wanted to check what others think about making a 3.3 release in the next
> 1-2 months.
>
> My plans are as follows:
>
> - finish the open documentation / userguide issues over Christmas
> - finish a few of my feature reque
Hi,
I wanted to check what others think about making a 3.3 release in the next
1-2 months.
My plans are as follows:
- finish the open documentation / userguide issues over Christmas
- finish a few of my feature requests for which I have a patch ready but
are missing tests
till mid/end of Ja
Le 18/12/2013 09:21, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> The end-of-information part could probably be dealt with in the subclass
> specific implementation of decompressNextSymbol and increasing the code
> size may happen in addEntry, not sure. As for endianess, Emmanuel
> briefly mentioned a BitInputStre
On 2013-12-17, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> I am wondering how far this can be taken. TIFF's LZW uses an
> end-of-information code after the clear code, allows both
> little-endian and big-endian packing of bytes, and increases the code
> size one step too early. Is it even possible to generalize LZW
11 matches
Mail list logo
