On 11/9/13 3:27 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/09/2013 11:21 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 13:13:05 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 11/5/13 5:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> I have scanned for exact duplicates quite a few times and never
>>> found any. There are quit
Some feedback:
1) Classes with HTML formatting problems that are messing up the javadocs.
They are likely all due to missing end tags:
* MappedPropertyDescriptor
* LazyDynaMap
* LazyDyanClass
* LazyDynaBean
* ConvertUtilsBean
* BeanPropertyValueEqualsPredicate
* BasicDynaBean
2) Does Converter ha
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 00:27:28 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 11/09/2013 11:21 PM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 13:13:05 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/5/13 5:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
[...]
I have scanned for exact duplicates quite a few times and never
found any. There are quite a few that
On 11/09/2013 11:21 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 13:13:05 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 11/5/13 5:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
>> [...]
>> I have scanned for exact duplicates quite a few times and never
>> found any. There are quite a few that are similar, but differ in
>> mat
On Sat, 09 Nov 2013 13:13:05 -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/5/13 5:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
[...]
I have scanned for exact duplicates quite a few times and never
found any. There are quite a few that are similar, but differ in
material ways (strict versus non-strict inequalities, endpoints
include
Neither does log4j 2 ;)
Original message
From: henrib
Date:11/09/2013 12:23 (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: RE: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
IMHO, commons logging is the best choice for this kinds of lib; it does not
force the choice of the implementation l
On 11/5/13 5:21 AM, Gilles wrote:
[...]
I have scanned for exact duplicates quite a few times and never
found any. There are quite a few that are similar, but differ in
material ways (strict versus non-strict inequalities, endpoints
included / not included, etc.). Please
Log4j 2?
Original message
From: Christian Grobmeier
Date:11/09/2013 13:53 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [OGNL] Make use of logging?
On 9 Nov 2013, at 18:23, henrib wrote:
> IMHO, commons logging is the best choice for this kinds of lib; it
> does
Hi Paul,
Am 09.11.2013 19:31, schrieb Paul Benedict:
> Oliver, would you have time to publish a snapshot of 1.9's site so I can
> browse the javadocs and source xref? I can easily provide feedback if you
> do that.
thanks for your interest! I uploaded the site to [1]. All comments are
welcome!
O
I like it pretty much. Good job.
Anything which can go back into fluido and gives us the chnace to work
with the "original fluido"?
On 2 Nov 2013, at 18:47, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
Hi all,
I have further reworked the skin available at
https://github.com/netomi/commons-skin-fluido and the res
On 9 Nov 2013, at 19:54, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 7 Nov 2013, at 18:08, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
2013/11/7 Jason Pyeron :
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:00
Yes, as long as it's Log4j2 ;-)
Now I need a sed script to replace j.u.l. to
On 7 Nov 2013, at 18:08, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
2013/11/7 Jason Pyeron :
-Original Message-
From: Benedikt Ritter
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:00
Yes, as long as it's Log4j2 ;-)
Now I need a sed script to replace j.u.l. to it...
Is Log4j2 the one that is desired? I figured S
On 9 Nov 2013, at 18:23, henrib wrote:
IMHO, commons logging is the best choice for this kinds of lib; it
does not
force the choice of the implementation library.
No. Commons Logging is NOT the best choice. It's one of the worst.
Just my opinion, but I will object to that.
Henrib
--
View
Oliver, would you have time to publish a snapshot of 1.9's site so I can
browse the javadocs and source xref? I can easily provide feedback if you
do that.
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Just a heads-up that I intend to start the preparations for a
> [beanutils] 1.9.0 rel
Just a heads-up that I intend to start the preparations for a
[beanutils] 1.9.0 release soon. So if there is something you want to see
included in this release, now is a good time to step up.
It would be great if somebody could find the time to review the changes
made for adding generics [1].
TIA
IMHO, commons logging is the best choice for this kinds of lib; it does not
force the choice of the implementation library.
Henrib
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/OGNL-Make-use-of-logging-tp4653577p4656625.html
Sent from the Commons - Dev mailing lis
+1
On Nov 8, 2013 3:28 PM, "Thomas Neidhart" wrote:
> On 11/08/2013 09:20 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 11/8/13 11:59 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Luc Maisonobe
> wrote:
> >>
> is there still consensus that we are going to remove the sparse
> implementat
17 matches
Mail list logo
