Re: [math] new feature to allow infinite limits in numerical integration.

On 6/21/13 5:17 PM, Ajo Fod wrote: > I've submitted a patch for the issue (see MATH-994). This will allow users > to integrate functions with infinity as one of the bounds. > > Cheers, > Ajo Fod. > Thanks for bringing the discussion to the dev list, Ajo. As Gilles said on the ticket, its a little

Re: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox

On 22 June 2013 20:39, Simone Tripodi wrote: > There is an existing plugin[1] that supports checksums generation > applying a wider range of digest algorithm, it could help on inspiring > the ASF one. Thanks. The one I wrote is equivalent to that plugins goals file/files, except mine has slightl

Re: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox

There is an existing plugin[1] that supports checksums generation applying a wider range of digest algorithm, it could help on inspiring the ASF one. my 0.02 EU ;) [1] http://nicoulaj.github.io/checksum-maven-plugin/examples/using-custom-checksum-algorithms.html http://people.apache.org/~simone

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

Am 22.06.2013 19:10, schrieb Gary Gregory: On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:41, Phil Steitz wrote: On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If that means maven plugins, so be it. This is written a

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

On Jun 22, 2013, at 12:41, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If >>> that means maven plugins, so be it. >> This is written as someone who has never released

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

On 6/22/13 7:26 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: >> I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If >> that means maven plugins, so be it. > This is written as someone who has never released a commons component > and is very grateful for the fol

Re: [CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Digest Plugin 0.1 based on RC2

I've just been told about the Maven Sandbox, which might be a better place for this and the signfiles plugins. Investigating On 22 June 2013 14:27, sebb wrote: > I'm cancelling this vote, as it's not clear we should be releasing our > plugin tools to the general public. > > On 21 June 2013 23:46

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

On 22/06/2013 14:45, Gary Gregory wrote: > I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If > that means maven plugins, so be it. This is written as someone who has never released a commons component and is very grateful for the folks that have done the release work for the com

Re: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox

On 22 June 2013 15:15, Olivier Lamy wrote: > what about moving this to maven plugins ? > I'm pretty sure this could help some ASF projects. But only ASF projects; it assumes specific processes. > NOTE: the Maven sandbox path is open for all committers. Thanks, that would be a better route for t

Re: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox

what about moving this to maven plugins ? I'm pretty sure this could help some ASF projects. NOTE: the Maven sandbox path is open for all committers. And btw probably won't be hard to promote it and add sebb in maven committers. My 0.02 AUD 2013/6/22 Phil Steitz : > -0 > > I don't think this sort

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

I'm for whatever does the RM process easier and less error prone. If that means maven plugins, so be it. Gary On Jun 22, 2013, at 8:53, sebb wrote: > On 22 June 2013 12:50, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> 2013/6/22 Jörg Schaible >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> sebb wrote: >>> On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil St

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Commons Digest Plugin 0.1 based on RC2

I'm cancelling this vote, as it's not clear we should be releasing our plugin tools to the general public. On 21 June 2013 23:46, sebb wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Commons Digest Plugin 0.1 based on RC2 > > This is the initial release of the digest plugin, which creates MD5 > and SHA

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

On 22 June 2013 12:50, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2013/6/22 Jörg Schaible > >> Hi, >> >> sebb wrote: >> >> > On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil Steitz wrote: >> >> -0 >> >> >> >> I don't think this sort of things belongs in Commons proper as a >> >> component. What we advertise, release and support from

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

2013/6/22 Jörg Schaible > Hi, > > sebb wrote: > > > On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> -0 > >> > >> I don't think this sort of things belongs in Commons proper as a > >> component. What we advertise, release and support from commons > >> proper are general purpose libraries that dev

Re: [CHAIN] Thoughts about o.a.c.chain2.Chain, o.a.c.chain2.Command and the base classes

Am 22.06.2013 um 12:57 schrieb Simone Tripodi : > Hi Jonas, > >> >> I will provide a patch for >> CHAIN-98tomorow. The >> patch will only cover the refactoring of CONTINUE and >> COMPLETED processing results. >> > > nice to read that, looking fo

Re: [CHAIN] Thoughts about o.a.c.chain2.Chain, o.a.c.chain2.Command and the base classes

Hi Jonas, > > I will provide a patch for > CHAIN-98tomorow. The > patch will only cover the refactoring of CONTINUE and > COMPLETED processing results. > nice to read that, looking forward to the patch! :) > But, I do not understand how exceptions

Re: [ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

Hi, sebb wrote: > On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil Steitz wrote: >> -0 >> >> I don't think this sort of things belongs in Commons proper as a >> component. What we advertise, release and support from commons >> proper are general purpose libraries that developers can use in >> their own applications

[ALL] Strategy for developer tools (was: [VOTE] Commons Staging Plugin - move to proper from sandbox)

On 22 June 2013 00:15, Phil Steitz wrote: > -0 > > I don't think this sort of things belongs in Commons proper as a > component. What we advertise, release and support from commons > proper are general purpose libraries that developers can use in > their own applications. This is what Commons wa