On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 15 June 2013 15:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I thought 2.6 had such a class and we got rid of it.
>
> 2.6 had a class by the same name (so I've discovered since your mail),
> but it merely amalgamated the different random methods from Math
On 15 June 2013 15:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I thought 2.6 had such a class and we got rid of it.
2.6 had a class by the same name (so I've discovered since your mail),
but it merely amalgamated the different random methods from Math and
Random.
I think this new class does exactly what is requir
I thought 2.6 had such a class and we got rid of it.
G
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 14 June 2013 07:55, Duncan Jones wrote:
> > On 13 June 2013 21:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 6/13/13 1:03 AM, Duncan Jones wrote:
>
> >
> >> I am not sure where this little metho
On 14 June 2013 07:55, Duncan Jones wrote:
> On 13 June 2013 21:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 6/13/13 1:03 AM, Duncan Jones wrote:
>
>> I am not sure where this little method would fit in [lang]; but it might
>> make sense to add there in the simple form above (with RANDOM
>> static, I assume).
>
Am 14.06.2013 um 22:36 schrieb Benedikt Ritter :
> Hi,
>
> the o.a.c.chain2.generic.CopyCommand IMHO really implements two commands:
>
> * a CopyCommand that copies a value from one key to another
> * an OverrideCommand, that overrides a value with a provided value.
We could even extract a Rem
