On 2013-06-10, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 10/06/2013 11:02, Torsten Curdt a écrit :
>> Of course we could be user friendly and add the heuristic but that's
>> like opening a can of worms.
> I agree. And considering the format has been deprecated in favor of xz I
> wouldn't worry too much.
Sound
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "ReleaseDeployment" page has been changed by sebbapache:
https://wiki.apache.org/commons/ReleaseDeployment?action=diff&rev1=5&rev2=6
So the process would be:
* mvn deploy -
On 10 June 2013 10:19, sebb wrote:
> On 9 June 2013 16:23, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> signatures and checksums are okay.
>> Tag and source dists match.
>> Site looks good.
>>
>> Builds fine from sources with:
>>
>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02
On 10 June 2013 21:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hey Sebb,
>
> Am 10.06.2013 um 21:31 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 9 June 2013 16:12, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>> Hello sebb,
>>>
>>> Am 09.06.2013 um 16:38 schrieb sebb :
>>>
On 9 June 2013 11:18, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Sun Jun 9
On 10 June 2013 21:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hey Sebb,
>
> Am 10.06.2013 um 21:31 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 9 June 2013 16:12, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>> Hello sebb,
>>>
>>> Am 09.06.2013 um 16:38 schrieb sebb :
>>>
On 9 June 2013 11:18, wrote:
> Author: britter
> Date: Sun Jun 9
Hey Sebb,
Am 10.06.2013 um 21:31 schrieb sebb :
> On 9 June 2013 16:12, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> Hello sebb,
>>
>> Am 09.06.2013 um 16:38 schrieb sebb :
>>
>>> On 9 June 2013 11:18, wrote:
Author: britter
Date: Sun Jun 9 10:18:42 2013
New Revision: 1491175
URL: ht
On 9 June 2013 16:12, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello sebb,
>
> Am 09.06.2013 um 16:38 schrieb sebb :
>
>> On 9 June 2013 11:18, wrote:
>>> Author: britter
>>> Date: Sun Jun 9 10:18:42 2013
>>> New Revision: 1491175
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1491175
>>> Log:
>>> Use viewvc instead of r
Hi folks,
had a quick look
* similar functionality of both components
* launcher has some bells and whistles regarding launching Java
processes compared to commons-exec
* commons-launcher has Ant dependencies
IMHO retiring commons-launcher and moving it to commons-exec is a good idea
Cheer
Hi folks,
there is actually "launcher" code in commons-exec - see
org.apache.commons.exec.launcher
I'm having a look "Launcher" code this evening
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 10.06.13 12:07, Ricardo Espírito Santo wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Thank you for your comments. Please find mine @inline.
Hi Emmanuel,
Thank you for your comments. Please find mine @inline.
Regards,
Ricardo Espírito Santo
On 10 June 2013 00:48, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 09/06/2013 22:03, Ricardo Espírito Santo a écrit :
>
> > - Very similar objectives, features and aims
>
> exec: Invoke an external application
Le 10/06/2013 11:02, Torsten Curdt a écrit :
> Of course we could be user friendly and add the heuristic but that's
> like opening a can of worms.
I agree. And considering the format has been deprecated in favor of xz I
wouldn't worry too much.
Emmanuel Bourg
signature.asc
Description: Open
On 9 June 2013 16:23, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> signatures and checksums are okay.
> Tag and source dists match.
> Site looks good.
>
> Builds fine from sources with:
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
> 14:51:28+0100)
> Maven home: /Applicatio
On 2013-06-10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> The problem is not unique to LZMA, and since LZMA can contain almost
> any bytes at the beginning, it could also be misdetected as another
> compression format.
Right, that's why I suggested to put LZMA detection at the end, if at
all.
> If we can't autod
> We could do something similar by placing the LZMA check at the end in
> the CompressorStreamFactory's autodetect method and perform the same
> plausibility checks on the input. This would still run the risk of
> false positives and - maybe less likely - false negatives. Do we want
> to do somet
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I added support for decompressing .lzma files I left out matches()
> and you can only get an LZMACompressorInputStream from
> CompressorStreamFactory if you use the version that explicitly specifies
> the format.
>
> The reason
15 matches
Mail list logo