On 23 March 2013 14:27, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the priceless effort on B64, Seb!
>
> what's the status ATM, do you think it can be included in a RC?
Yes.
> TIA, all the best,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://t
On 2013-03-23, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> I'll start working on the follow-up document soonish.
Now also done: http://commons.staging.apache.org/releases/release.html
Please review it and correct my mistakes before the site gets published.
Stefan
--
On 2013-03-23, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I have one question: I have not cut a release in a while and was
> always able before to avoid Nexus and the maven release plugin. I
> understand now there is no way around using these. First, that is
> correct, right?
There is no way around Nexus. I haven'
On 3/23/13 10:41 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> Thanks for this, Stefan!
>
> Matt
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just updated the releasing guide up to the point in time where the
>> release vote happens. It covers publishing via Nexus and svnpubsub fo
Thanks for this, Stefan!
Matt
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just updated the releasing guide up to the point in time where the
> release vote happens. It covers publishing via Nexus and svnpubsub for
> releases. This has not been published, yet:
>
> h
Hi,
I've just updated the releasing guide up to the point in time where the
release vote happens. It covers publishing via Nexus and svnpubsub for
releases. This has not been published, yet:
http://commons.staging.apache.org/releases/prepare.html
Feedback and corrections more than welcome. I'
On 03/04/2013 01:57 PM, Gilles wrote:
> Hello.
>
>>
>> I would like to release version 3.2 of [math] soon.
>> Any thoughts about it?
>
> How soon?
> There are many unresolved issues targetting 3.2.
> There is at least one bug with no fix target (MATH-936).
> There is at least one contribution r
Thanks a lot for the priceless effort on B64, Seb!
what's the status ATM, do you think it can be included in a RC?
TIA, all the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Mar 21, 201
On 03/19/2013 09:56 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2013/3/19 Thomas Neidhart
>
>> On 03/16/2013 02:06 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Logging 1.1.2 based on RC2.
>>>
>>> This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC1:
>>>
>>
On 03/23/2013 12:41 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while looking through the code, I was asking myself why we expose
> implementation classes. Wouldn't it be better to extract interfaces from
> CSVParser, CSVPrinter and CSVRecord? At least for the CSVRecord it would
> make sense because user
Hi,
while looking through the code, I was asking myself why we expose
implementation classes. Wouldn't it be better to extract interfaces from
CSVParser, CSVPrinter and CSVRecord? At least for the CSVRecord it would
make sense because users cannot create CSVRecord instances. Why binding
them to a
Ok, looking
--Brian (mobile)
On Mar 22, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
>
>> I'm here too ;-)
>>
>> Which release exactly? It's possible that we overlooked something when
>> we moved the remaining commons projects over to rao.
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
