To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-math has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On 11/15/12 10:52 AM, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> I misunderstood an earlier email and I though the compute method was public.
> It seems that adding a public compute method may be more complication and
> effort than it is worth. My apologies for the misunderstanding. The compute
> method would only
Yes. Sounds similar.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > The assign methods are inherited. The signatures are like
> > assign(DoubleFunction), assign(DoubleDoubleFunction, Matrix other) and so
> > on.
>
> OK, assign looks like what I was calling "evaluate" and
> DoubleFunc
On 11/15/12 10:56 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz
>> wrote:
Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide
some sample code?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz
> wrote:
> >
> >> Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide
> >> some sample code?
> >>
> > You don't. See my next paragrap
I misunderstood an earlier email and I though the compute method was public. It
seems that adding a public compute method may be more complication and effort
than it is worth. My apologies for the misunderstanding. The compute method
would only be of value if it can be an easy addition.
-O
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/11/14 Thomas Vandahl :
On 14.11.2012 08:40, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> Please, could someone who knows what to d
On 11/15/12 10:29 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide
>> some sample code?
>>
> You don't. See my next paragraph.
>
> See the assign method in this class:
>
> https://github.com/apac
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Do you know how to do that with a primitive array? Can you provide
> some sample code?
>
You don't. See my next paragraph.
See the assign method in this class:
https://github.com/apache/mahout/blob/trunk/math/src/main/java/org/apache/mah
On 11/15/12 9:22 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> On 11/15/12 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>>> The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute
>> is to also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view
>> me
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 11/15/12 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> >
> > The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute
> is to also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view
> methods can be composed with a small number
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >> This is a false dichotomy.
> >>
> >> Maven site generation can work with ASF CMS if desired.
> >
> > That is sort of true but doesn't really apply to commons. I created the
> Flume site using Maven and Maven generates the site from RST so
On 11/15/12 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute is to
> also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view methods
> can be composed with a small number of compute/aggregate methods to get the
> expressive powe
The typical answer to this when adding a functional method like compute is to
also add a view object. The rationale is that a small number of view methods
can be composed with a small number of compute/aggregate methods to get the
expressive power of what would otherwise require a vast array o
On 11/15/12 5:40 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
>> These changes look fine to me and the addition of the compute method is
>> really nice.
> Oh, I should have asked whether you can also look at the source code in the
> trunk: Currently the "compute(UnivariateStatistic)" method is only
> impleme
Hi.
>
> These changes look fine to me and the addition of the compute method is
> really nice.
Oh, I should have asked whether you can also look at the source code in the
trunk: Currently the "compute(UnivariateStatistic)" method is only
implemented internally (in a private inner class of "Descr
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Gilles,
These changes look fine to me and the addition of the compute method is
really nice. Looking more closely at my code, I am using the getElements
method. As long as that remains available, it make sense to deprecate the
getInternalValues method.
My use of ResizeableDoubleArray is relate
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbutils has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi Patrick.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:38:07PM -0500, Patrick Meyer wrote:
> Please keep ResizeableDoubleArray as its own class. I find it very useful
> for more than descriptive statistics. I do like the idea of adding an apply
> method to it.
Could you please have a look at the JIRA page:
htt
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
Hello.
> > [...]
> >>
> > I have never read this part of CM yet. But just this makes me think
> > that the
> > "FixedElapsedTime" class should not exist in CM. Indeed, using it makes
> > the
> > algorithm behave differently at each run!
> > I don't deny the usefulness
2012/11/15 Ralph Goers :
>
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:03 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/11/14 Thomas Vandahl :
On 14.11.2012 08:40, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>
> Please, could someone who knows what to do step up?
Ju
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 11/15/2012 09:55 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/15/2012 09:08 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
>> On 11/15/2012 02:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:38:47PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 11/14/12 4:05 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2
On 11/15/2012 09:08 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 11/15/2012 02:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:38:47PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 11/14/12 4:05 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:09:52PM -, t...@apache.org wrote:
> A
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
On 11/15/2012 01:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:09:52PM -, t...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: tn
>> Date: Wed Nov 14 20:09:51 2012
>> New Revision: 1409352
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1409352&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Reduce sleep time in unit test
On 11/15/2012 02:23 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 04:38:47PM -0800, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 11/14/12 4:05 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 08:09:52PM -, t...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tn
Date: Wed Nov 14 20:09:51 2012
New
32 matches
Mail list logo
