> * Why doesn't "KolmogorovSmirnovDistribution" implement one of the
>interfaces of the package (and/or inherit from an abstract class)?
See also:
http://apache-commons.680414.n4.nabble.com/math-KolmogorovSmirnovDistribution-not-part-of-the-distribution-hierarchy-td4114395.html
> * Why is
Hello,
2012/7/13 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hi.
>
>>
>> as you already mentioned, this bug is filed in MATH-821. I really need
>> some input, because I do not really know how to fix this bug in a
>> statisfactory way.
>
> I'd suggest that users of "OpenMapRealVector" step up and provide advice on
> how t
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-chain2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-dbcp has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hello.
Some questions about classes in package "o.a.c.m.distribution".
* Why doesn't "KolmogorovSmirnovDistribution" implement one of the
interfaces of the package (and/or inherit from an abstract class)?
* Why is method "probability(double)" part of the "RealDistribution"
interface? [All imp
On 30 July 2012 22:49, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 2:17 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 30 July 2012 22:13, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 30, 2012, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 30 July 2012 20:34, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 29.07.2012 22:41, schrieb Ralph Goers:
>
>>
On Jul 30, 2012, at 2:17 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 July 2012 22:13, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 30, 2012, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 30 July 2012 20:34, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 29.07.2012 22:41, schrieb Ralph Goers:
> I used that specifically to avoid creating multiple
Thanks, Mark, that makes sense!
In that case I will apply all the patches to 1.5 too.
Thanks everyone for helping with this!
Liv
Liviu Tudor
E: liviu.tu...@gmail.com
C: +1 650-2833815 (USA)
M: +44 (0)7591540313 (UK, Europe)
W: http://about.me/liviutudor
Skype: liviutudor
I'm nobody, nobo
On 30/07/2012 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
>
>> Mark/Gary/Seb,
>>
>> Just to clarify this: I haven't touched at all the 1.5 branch -- all of
>> these refer strictly to the 1.6 branch (which uses JDK 1.5 according to
>> the pom and also uses Juni
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Mark/Gary/Seb,
>
> Just to clarify this: I haven't touched at all the 1.5 branch -- all of
> these refer strictly to the 1.6 branch (which uses JDK 1.5 according to
> the pom and also uses Junit 4.10).
>
> So in the light of these, should I:
>
Mark/Gary/Seb,
Just to clarify this: I haven't touched at all the 1.5 branch -- all of
these refer strictly to the 1.6 branch (which uses JDK 1.5 according to
the pom and also uses Junit 4.10).
So in the light of these, should I:
1/ also apply these patches to the 1.5 branch?
2/ downgrade junit
On 30 July 2012 22:13, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2012, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 30 July 2012 20:34, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>> Am 29.07.2012 22:41, schrieb Ralph Goers:
>>>
I used that specifically to avoid creating multiple combined
configurations since it can be fairly exp
On 30 July 2012 21:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/07/2012 21:07, Liviu Tudor wrote:
>> * Findbugs: indeed, some of the findbugs warnings are not entirely correct
>> -- and we should probably look at using the Findbugs annotations to
>> manually annotate the ones which we know to actually be false
On Jul 30, 2012, at 2:10 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 July 2012 20:34, Oliver Heger wrote:
>> Am 29.07.2012 22:41, schrieb Ralph Goers:
>>
>>> I used that specifically to avoid creating multiple combined
>>> configurations since it can be fairly expensive to create them. I looked
>>> into the guara
On 30 July 2012 20:34, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Am 29.07.2012 22:41, schrieb Ralph Goers:
>
>> I used that specifically to avoid creating multiple combined
>> configurations since it can be fairly expensive to create them. I looked
>> into the guarantees that ConcurrentMap provides before I implemen
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Hi Gary!
>
> See my previous email on pool which touches on that; I am experiencing the
> same test failures and Mark just confirmed that the tests should be
> changed.
>
> I'm currently in the process of submitting a patch for it -- hopefully
On 30/07/2012 22:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I wonder if this change:
>
> POOL-212. If minIdle > maxIdle use maxIdle in place of minIdle (rev 1325476
> by markt)
>
> broke the 4 tests below.
>
> Could the change be bogus or the tests need to be adjusted.
As per my previous message, t
Hi Gary!
See my previous email on pool which touches on that; I am experiencing the
same test failures and Mark just confirmed that the tests should be
changed.
I'm currently in the process of submitting a patch for it -- hopefully no
one else is working on the same? (Or should I leave this to so
Hi All:
I wonder if this change:
POOL-212. If minIdle > maxIdle use maxIdle in place of minIdle (rev 1325476
by markt)
broke the 4 tests below.
Could the change be bogus or the tests need to be adjusted.
My set up:
Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 03:44:56-0500)
Maven home: C:\Java\ap
On 30/07/2012 21:07, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> * Findbugs: indeed, some of the findbugs warnings are not entirely correct
> -- and we should probably look at using the Findbugs annotations to
> manually annotate the ones which we know to actually be false alarms?
> There were also a couple related to pe
Hey Mark,
* I understand about JIRA -- my question was I guess more upon the lines
of should I submit a patch in JIRA (after opening a ticket) and then carry
out the discussion for things like Set vs List there, or is this list a
better place. I understand now that the dev list is better, thank yo
Am 29.07.2012 22:41, schrieb Ralph Goers:
I used that specifically to avoid creating multiple combined configurations
since it can be fairly expensive to create them. I looked into the guarantees
that ConcurrentMap provides before I implemented that and included the comment
since I knew it wo
On 30/07/2012 09:36, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Thanks very much for pointing me in the right direction, Mark!
> As with all development tasks, this, however, opened up new questions --
> not entirely sure if these are best discussed on this list or whether
> occasionally I should open up a JIRA ticket f
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-logging-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
Thi
Hi,
i'd like to submit a patch for handling NULL values in special situations.
I've created an jira issue CSV-93 - Allow the handling of NULL values
including a patch.
The patch includes a new testcase for the behavior.
The existing tests are still working :)
Issue: CSV-93
Link:https://issue
Thanks very much for pointing me in the right direction, Mark!
As with all development tasks, this, however, opened up new questions --
not entirely sure if these are best discussed on this list or whether
occasionally I should open up a JIRA ticket for this so more than
welcoming suggestions here.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jmx has an issue affecting its community integration.
T
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
31 matches
Mail list logo
