Re: [IMAGING] Getting EXIF and IPTC metadata using metadata and image format neutral code

2012-07-06 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
Hi Farrukh Your patch is just an empty file. Regards Damjan On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote: > Hi Damjan, > > Attached is the patch for implementing the proposed change outlined in > bullets below. > Please review and then commit if satisfied or discuss further. Thanks. > >

Re: Bad Request on Nexus

2012-07-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
Thanks Seb, > It's still using the old style Maven coordinates; such components have > to be enabled individually. > I honestly don't remember indeed if, when I cut a past DbUtils RC, I used Nexus or not... :P > You probably need to raise a JIRA for it to be added to Nexus. > good, thanks! > N

Re: Bad Request on Nexus

2012-07-06 Thread sebb
On 6 July 2012 22:57, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all, > > did someone already get "Bad Request" reponse from Nexus when > uploading artifacts? While trying to cut an RC for DBUtils, I stumbled > in that issue... Has Nexus been enabled for DBUtils? It's still using the old style Maven coordinates

Re: svn commit: r1358432 - /commons/proper/dbutils/tags/DBUTILS_1_5_RC1/

2012-07-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
OK, thanks!!! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 11:55 PM, sebb wrote: > On 6 July 2012 22:52, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi Gary! >> >> which date would you suggest

Bad Request on Nexus

2012-07-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, did someone already get "Bad Request" reponse from Nexus when uploading artifacts? While trying to cut an RC for DBUtils, I stumbled in that issue... If there is something new, I'll write to repository@ TIA, all the best, -Simo [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:mave

Re: svn commit: r1358432 - /commons/proper/dbutils/tags/DBUTILS_1_5_RC1/

2012-07-06 Thread sebb
On 6 July 2012 22:52, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Gary! > > which date would you suggest to put? The current date I am cutting the RC? How about RC creation date plus 3 or 4 days - that will be closer to the actual release date. > I am still in time of reverting changes - I am experiencing issues

Re: svn commit: r1358432 - /commons/proper/dbutils/tags/DBUTILS_1_5_RC1/

2012-07-06 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Gary! which date would you suggest to put? The current date I am cutting the RC? I am still in time of reverting changes - I am experiencing issues with Nexus... but I'll open a new thread about it. TIA, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ htt

Re: svn commit: r1358432 - /commons/proper/dbutils/tags/DBUTILS_1_5_RC1/

2012-07-06 Thread Gary Gregory
FWIW, I find it less of a hassle to to set the release date in changes.xml and any where else to the RC date, commit, and then do all the rest of the RC dance. This way, the RC tag includes the RC date and not '?'s in source.xml as we have now for some components. My 2c, Gary On Fri, Jul 6, 2012

Re: [IMAGING] Getting EXIF and IPTC metadata using metadata and image format neutral code

2012-07-06 Thread Farrukh Najmi
Hi Damjan, Attached is the patch for implementing the proposed change outlined in bullets below. Please review and then commit if satisfied or discuss further. Thanks. On 07/06/2012 02:29 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote: An example of a metadata property that has no IIM mapping defined is Name: Sce

Re: [IMAGING] Getting EXIF and IPTC metadata using metadata and image format neutral code

2012-07-06 Thread Farrukh Najmi
An example of a metadata property that has no IIM mapping defined is Name: Scene Code, XMP property id: Scene (page 15 of 55 in spec) On 07/06/2012 02:25 PM, Farrukh Najmi wrote: Hi Damjan, Thanks for the +1. As I started on this patch I made some observations in the IPTC-PhotoMetadata-200

Re: [IMAGING] Getting EXIF and IPTC metadata using metadata and image format neutral code

2012-07-06 Thread Farrukh Najmi
Hi Damjan, Thanks for the +1. As I started on this patch I made some observations in the IPTC-PhotoMetadata-2008.pdfspec: * Not all metadata properties have an IIM mapping defined. For these we will have to invent a type code. I propose we assign codes starting at 1 arbitrarily in s