Hi,
I know that CM3 should be in a frozen state now, but while working
with FieldElement this morning, I've noticed that the contract of
divide(T) states that an ArithmeticException *should* be thrown if the
parameter is zero. However, for this boundary case
- BigFraction.divide(BigFraction) thro
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-lang3-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 26 February 2012 01:14, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 19:18, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 25 February 2012 14:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:23 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb wrot
On Feb 25, 2012, at 19:18, sebb wrote:
> On 25 February 2012 14:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:23 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 February 2012 00:47, wrote:
>>
On 25 February 2012 14:46, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:23 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 25 February 2012 00:47, wrote:
>> >> > Author: ggregory
>> >> > Date: Sat Feb 25 00
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19328&projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 25 Feb 2012 22:23:02 +
Finished at: Sat 25 Feb 2012 22:24:09 +
Total time: 1m 6s
Build Trigger: Schedule
B
yahoo, yet another `invalid target release: 1.6` that is not so nice -
do I have to contact INFRA?
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Continuum@vmbuil
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=19326&projectId=75
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 25 Feb 2012 21:20:14 +
Finished at: Sat 25 Feb 2012 21:22:00 +
Total time: 1m 45s
Build Trigger: Schedule
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM, James Carman
> wrote:
>
>> Gary,
>>
>> In this case, we're dealing with a veto to a code modification, which
>> is allowed. Here's the information with respect to code modification
>> vetoes (http://www.apach
Hi,
On 25/02/2012 19:51, James Carman wrote:
The code shouldn't "visit" each of the connected nodes during the
iteration. It should only visit the "popped" node and then add all
un-visited, connected nodes to the stack. Hopefully we've implemented
this so that all we have to do to switch from
On 02/25/2012 07:50 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:15 PM, sebb wrote:
I've discovered the problem - Daemon 1.0.9 has not been deployed to
Maven Central.
So... don't we need to do that /now/ so we can see what Clirr says when you
download and run a src package?
It won'
The code shouldn't "visit" each of the connected nodes during the
iteration. It should only visit the "popped" node and then add all
un-visited, connected nodes to the stack. Hopefully we've implemented
this so that all we have to do to switch from dfs to bfs is to swap
out the collection used.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:15 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 February 2012 17:00, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > On 02/24/2012 04:17 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> I downloaded
> >>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~mturk/daemon-1.0.10/sourc
Hi Marco,
IIRC the vertex order should be guarded by the vertexStack - maybe it
is just the handler be called in the wrong way.
Do you have/can you provide please testcases?
TIA,
-SImo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripod
Hi all. I've a little doubt on DFS algorithm implemented in the
DefaultVisitAlgorithmsSelector.
I think that the visit doesn't serch in depth but in a breadth way.
here is a little code snippet:
[ ... ]
while ( visitingGraph && !vertexStack.isEmpty() )
{
V v = vertexStack.
Hi all,
Le 23/02/2012 16:45, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1245061&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Removed unneeded clone.
>>
>> The clone did not protect the array used, only the reference
>> ones.
Hi,
for some reason this discussion ended without a result. Maybe it is time
to summarize what has been discussed so far.
This all goes back to a commit by Gary, that fixed several check style
issues in VFS [1]. The following discussion between Gary and Ralph and
others [2] showed, that ther
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:00 AM, James Carman
wrote:
> Gary,
>
> In this case, we're dealing with a veto to a code modification, which
> is allowed. Here's the information with respect to code modification
> vetoes (http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto):
>
> "A code-modification pro
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:19 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 25 February 2012 14:05, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Because we are using (still) some Java 6 code for this recent
>> contribution.
>>
>> > Ready, set, ... go?
>>
>> -1
>>
>> Completely unnece
Gary,
In this case, we're dealing with a veto to a code modification, which
is allowed. Here's the information with respect to code modification
vetoes (http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#Veto):
"A code-modification proposal may be stopped dead in its tracks by a
-1 vote by a qualified
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:23 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> >
> >> On 25 February 2012 00:47, wrote:
> >> > Author: ggregory
> >> > Date: Sat Feb 25 00:47:00 2012
> >> > New Revision: 1293496
> >> >
> >> > UR
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:19 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 February 2012 14:05, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Right now, in trunk, we have:
> >
> > DescriptionResourcePathLocationType
> > The method getInstance(Locale) is undefined for the type
> > DateFormatSymbolsFastDateParser.java
>
On 25 February 2012 14:11, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 25 February 2012 00:47, wrote:
>> > Author: ggregory
>> > Date: Sat Feb 25 00:47:00 2012
>> > New Revision: 1293496
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1293496&view=rev
>> > Log:
>>
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 25 February 2012 00:47, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Sat Feb 25 00:47:00 2012
> > New Revision: 1293496
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1293496&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Update plugins.
> >
> > Modified:
> >commons/proper/
Hi Mladen,
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Fixed a typo in RC1 which caused compile failure in case there
> were no sys/capability.h header on the system.
> The new set of artefacts [1] and site [2] are at usual place
> based on tag [3]
>
>
> Please vote (vote will remain open for at least 72 hours).
>
>
good!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
2012/2/25 :
> Author: cs
> Date: Sat Feb 25 09:52:29 2012
> New Revision: 1293564
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1293564&view=rev
> Log:
On 25 February 2012 09:59, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hello.
>
>> >
>> > How do we proceed from here in order to release 3.0? Cf. ticket MATH-746,
>> > "Things to do before releasing 3.0".
>>
>> Sorry for being late on this.
>>
>> >
>> > Can we start to talk about an expected release date?
>>
>> I g
Hello.
> >
> > How do we proceed from here in order to release 3.0? Cf. ticket MATH-746,
> > "Things to do before releasing 3.0".
>
> Sorry for being late on this.
>
> >
> > Can we start to talk about an expected release date?
>
> I guess you did a wonderful job for closing everything. As it
34 matches
Mail list logo
