[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-digester3 (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: [ognl] Old issues....

Hello, pinging - do we still have chances for this or should we have a copy/paste session? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2577 Again, don't want to put unnecessary pressure on this, just want to know how good chances are here Cheers Christian On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Christ

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

For what it's worth, I am +1 here as well (I was the one who implemented the changed the required Java 1.6). Thanks... Bill- On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I am very much +1 what Hen and Simone said. Again. > > As a volunteer I am here for making some cool stuff,

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-exec-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

Re: When to create a new major release - Was [VOTE][CANCEL] The vote for commons-email-1.3 based on RC2 in cancelled

On 13 January 2012 06:00, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:52 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 12 January 2012 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:19 AM, sebb wrote: On 10 January 2012 16:45, Siegfried Goeschl wrote: > Hi folks, > > the main reason

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

I am very much +1 what Hen and Simone said. Again. As a volunteer I am here for making some cool stuff, but not to satisfy the needs of companies who are using outdated jdks. Sometimes it makes sense, but the "for ever support" of jdks becomes obsessive. Rather I would prefer to work with cool te

Re: svn commit: r1230906 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/random: RandomData.java RandomDataImpl.java

> > This is not good style: Unchecked exceptions in method signatures do not > offer any guarantee to the caller; not that only those exceptions will be > thrown and not even that these exceptions can actually be thrown. > Thus, it brings a level of redundancy (between Javadoc and signatures) that

Re: svn commit: r1230906 - in /commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/math/random: RandomData.java RandomDataImpl.java

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 07:04:10AM -, celes...@apache.org wrote: > Author: celestin > Date: Fri Jan 13 07:04:10 2012 > New Revision: 1230906 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1230906&view=rev > Log: > Javadoc > Made sure that exceptions are documented in both javadoc and method > sign

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

>> I'm tempted to go as far as to say it's irresponsible of us to support 1.5 >> :)> +1 and IMHO innovation blocking as well moreover from the commons homepage: "The Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable Java components." that doesn't mean to me "helping companies on ke