The online report at the top links to a page with details. The tests use a
method only available in Java 6...
Dennis
Sébastien Brisard wrote:
2012/1/12 Continuum@vmbuild :
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=17130&projectId=97
Build statistics:
St
2012/1/12 Continuum@vmbuild :
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=17130&projectId=97
>
> Build statistics:
> State: Failed
> Previous State: Ok
> Started at: Thu 12 Jan 2012 07:21:05 +
> Finished at: Thu 12 Jan 2012 07:22:12 +
> Total tim
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=17130&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 12 Jan 2012 07:21:05 +
Finished at: Thu 12 Jan 2012 07:22:12 +
Total time: 1m 7s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Hi,
while working on the patch contributed by Dennis (MATH-731), I've come
across an issue regarding the accuracy of some closed-form,
floating-point expressions. I'm not an expert (at all!) in this field,
so could you have a look, please?
Thanks!
Sébastien
---
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-digester3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
Commons Parent 23 has been released.
The changes from release 22 are:
- moved buildNumber plugin to profile which is activated unless
buildNumber.skip=true
- changed buildNumber plugin default provider to CLI; added "javasvn"
profile as override
- added aggregate:false to jxr plugin (aggregate is
Le 11 janvier 2012 07:42, Sébastien Brisard
a écrit :
> Hi,
> Dennis recently contributed a patch for triangular distributions (see
> MATH-731). One of the methods implemented is based on a third party
> Python code, the license of which is reproduced below. My question is:
> can I commit this pat
Hi,
I'm in the middle of porting LSQR (iterative solver for unsymmetric
systems) to Commons-Math. I need to be able to define a "transposable"
real linear operator. In other words, on top of
RealVector RealLinearOperator.operate(RealVector),
I also need a method which would read
RealVector RealLine
Hi All:
This vote passes with 4 +1s from the PMC:
Christian Grobmeier
Gary Gregory
Jörg Schaible
Oliver Heger
Gary
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Good day to you all:
>
> I have prepared Commons Pool 1.6-RC4.
>
> There is NO change from RC3.
>
> This RC exists because I
On 11 January 2012 13:18, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 11 January 2012 11:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, sebb wrote:
> The list is pretty concrete.
> It does not say anything on binary compatibility
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:55 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 January 2012 11:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, sebb wrote:
The list is pretty concrete.
It does not say anything on binary compatibility (or i didn't find it).
>>>
>>> "Release B is said to be full
Results:
+1 Gary Gregory
There were no other votes
Therefore the lazy consensus vote succeeds.
I will promote the staging repo shortly, and send the announce when
the files appear in Maven Central.
On 10 January 2012 02:22, Gary Gregory wrote:
> +1.
>
> Works with Commons Pool 1.x. For examp
On 11 January 2012 07:16, Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I think the best for commons-email-1.3 will be reverting the changes of the
> setters from
>
> Email setXXX(arg)
>
> to
>
> void setXXX(arg)
>
> which in turn gives me binary backward compatibility.
There are one or two other chan
On 11 January 2012 11:42, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> The list is pretty concrete.
>>> It does not say anything on binary compatibility (or i didn't find it).
>>
>> "Release B is said to be fully-compatible with Release A if B can
>> simply replac
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, sebb wrote:
>> The list is pretty concrete.
>> It does not say anything on binary compatibility (or i didn't find it).
>
> "Release B is said to be fully-compatible with Release A if B can
> simply replace A in (nearly) all circumstances and deployments without
> c
2012/1/11 Bill Barker :
> IMNAL, but it seems to be a basically badly worded basically BSD license.
> The main problems I see is that it is missing the words 'irrevocable' and
> 'perpetual' in the language. The correct place would probably be
> legal-discuss@a.o.
>
Thanks, didn't know about this M
17 matches
Mail list logo
