To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Anyone have any idea on this? Should I be seeing basic auth for my
challenge? Where can I set the password as I was never prompted to
enter it.
At this point, can someone else deploy RC1 while I figure out what is
wrong on my end?
Thanks...
Bill-
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:32 PM, William Speirs
On 14 December 2011 22:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/12/2011 19:12, sebb wrote:
>> On 14 December 2011 18:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> JNDI assumes resources are essentially beans i.e. have zero argument
>>> constructors and getters/setters. If this is not the case then some
>>> extra plumbing is
On 14/12/2011 19:12, sebb wrote:
> On 14 December 2011 18:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> JNDI assumes resources are essentially beans i.e. have zero argument
>> constructors and getters/setters. If this is not the case then some
>> extra plumbing is required. The further G[K]OP gets from a JavaBean the
Phil Steitz wrote:
>Here is my +1
>
>Could use a couple of more so the bug fixes can go out and we can
>proceed to a patch release for [dbcp] 1.3/1.4.
>
>Phil
>
>On 12/10/11 5:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> This is a patch release, including a couple of bug fixes.
>>
>> The release artifacts are h
sebb wrote:
>This is a parallel thread to the one about PoolFactory implementations.
>
>I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
>[Keyed]ObjectPool implementations, i.e.
>
>Generic[Keyed]ObjectPool
>
>I've looked at DBCP 1.4, which uses POOL 1.x.
>
>SharedPoolDataSource.registerPool()
On Dec 14, 2011, at 14:12, sebb wrote:
> On 14 December 2011 18:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 14/12/2011 12:10, sebb wrote:
>>> This is a parallel thread to the one about PoolFactory implementations.
>>>
>>> I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
>>> [Keyed]ObjectPool implementations
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=15866&projectId=98
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 14 Dec 2011 20:51:48 +
Finished at: Wed 14 Dec 2011 20:52:07 +
Total time: 18s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
On 14 December 2011 18:29, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/12/2011 12:10, sebb wrote:
>> This is a parallel thread to the one about PoolFactory implementations.
>>
>> I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
>> [Keyed]ObjectPool implementations, i.e.
>>
>> Generic[Keyed]ObjectPool
>>
>> I've
On 14/12/2011 12:10, sebb wrote:
> This is a parallel thread to the one about PoolFactory implementations.
>
> I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
> [Keyed]ObjectPool implementations, i.e.
>
> Generic[Keyed]ObjectPool
>
> I've looked at DBCP 1.4, which uses POOL 1.x.
>
> SharedP
On 14/12/2011 17:27, sebb wrote:
> On 14 December 2011 17:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 14/12/2011 09:23, sebb wrote:
>>> I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
>>> [Keyed]ObjectPoolFactory implementations, i.e.
>>>
>>> Generic[Keyed]ObjectPoolFactory
>>>
>>> I've looked at DBCP 1.4, w
On 12/14/11 5:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> This is a parallel thread to the one about PoolFactory implementations.
>
> I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
> [Keyed]ObjectPool implementations, i.e.
>
> Generic[Keyed]ObjectPool
>
> I've looked at DBCP 1.4, which uses POOL 1.x.
>
> SharedPoolD
This vote has passed, with +1 votes from
psteitz
luc
grobmeier
joerg
+0 votes from
sebb
ggregory
and not other votes.
Thanks to all who reviewed the RC.
I am traveling with limited access the next couple of days, so I
will wait to move publish the release until this weekend.
Phil
On 12/10/11
On 12/13/11 3:34 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>> This is a patch release, including a couple of bug fixes.
>>
>> The release artifacts are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/
>>
>> Release notes:
>> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/RELEASE-N
On 14 December 2011 17:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/12/2011 09:23, sebb wrote:
>> I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
>> [Keyed]ObjectPoolFactory implementations, i.e.
>>
>> Generic[Keyed]ObjectPoolFactory
>>
>> I've looked at DBCP 1.4, which uses POOL 1.x.
>
> You need to look a
On 14/12/2011 09:23, sebb wrote:
> I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
> [Keyed]ObjectPoolFactory implementations, i.e.
>
> Generic[Keyed]ObjectPoolFactory
>
> I've looked at DBCP 1.4, which uses POOL 1.x.
You need to look at DBCP trunk that uses POOL 2. There has been quite a
lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Are there any plans to update dbcp to support the new features in
Java7/JDBC4.1?
- --
James Page
Ubuntu Core Developer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
Hi,
On 14/12/2011 12:34, James Carman wrote:
I don't like the idea of pushing the adding, comparing, etc. into the
weights. I like the idea of having operations external to the weights
that take care of that stuff.
I would be happy with non-polluted weights, so I am with you. But I am
not qu
On 13 December 2011 20:25, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 13/12/2011 19:12, sebb wrote:
>> I've added some Javadoc to classes to indicate which ones are supposed
>> to be thread-safe and which are not.
>>
>> AFAICT, there remain 2 classes to be dealt with, ie
>>
>> GenericKeyedObjectPool (GKOP)
>> and
>>
This is a parallel thread to the one about PoolFactory implementations.
I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
[Keyed]ObjectPool implementations, i.e.
Generic[Keyed]ObjectPool
I've looked at DBCP 1.4, which uses POOL 1.x.
SharedPoolDataSource.registerPool() creates an instance of
G
Hello,
cool, thanks for the update. If you run out of time for some reason or
see any other problems with the import, pls let me/us know. I gladly
dedicate the cmd-c/cmd-v operations of the next days to ognl.
Cheers
Christian
2011/12/14 Łukasz Lenart :
> Hello,
>
> I have the dump on my local di
I don't like the idea of pushing the adding, comparing, etc. into the
weights. I like the idea of having operations external to the weights
that take care of that stuff.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Claudio Squarcella
wrote:
> Hey Simone,
>
>
> On 12/12/2011 18:35, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>
Hi,
trying to put it all together (thanks James, Matthew):
* Weighted is fully generic without restrictions on the type of
weight W
* different properties of weights are specified with interfaces: e.g.
Summable, HasZero, Comparable...
* each algorithm requires the weights to implem
I'm trying to establish the mutability needs of the
[Keyed]ObjectPoolFactory implementations, i.e.
Generic[Keyed]ObjectPoolFactory
I've looked at DBCP 1.4, which uses POOL 1.x.
DBCP 1.4 currently creates an instance of
GenericKeyedObjectPoolFactory, which it then uses via the interface
KeyedObje
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the Apache Commons
Digester 3.2 release!
The Apache Commons Digester package lets you configure an XML to Java
object mapping module which triggers certain actions called
ruleswhenever a particular pattern of nested XML elements is
recognized.
The Apac
On 13 December 2011 19:59, sebb wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 19:32, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> On 13/12/2011 18:40, s...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: sebb
>>> Date: Tue Dec 13 18:40:48 2011
>>> New Revision: 1213845
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213845&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Make fact
26 matches
Mail list logo
