>
> Hello,
> I've tried to make the doc of distribution.FastCosineTranform clearer.
> I would be grateful for any feedback!
> Have a nice day!
> Sébastien
>
Some further thoughts: I think the formulas for the "standard" and
"orthogonal" normalization should be moved to the header of the
Javadoc. Wh
Hello,
I've tried to make the doc of distribution.FastCosineTranform clearer.
I would be grateful for any feedback!
Have a nice day!
Sébastien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands,
On 12/12/11 5:30 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 December 2011 00:02, sebb wrote:
>> On 12 December 2011 21:07, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/12/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> thanks for t
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Dec 13, 2011, at 0:12, Phil Steitz wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 12, 2011, at 8:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Hi All:
>>
>> We keep on maintaining 1.5.x, that is very good :)
>>
>> But, I for one, am tired of not having generics and do not feel like
>> rushing 2.0 just to get them.
>
>>
> I think
Did you do the whole master pass phrase/obfuscated stuff that the top
of the Using Nexus wiki points to? It takes me a while to get that
right each time I set up a new machine.
Gary
On Dec 12, 2011, at 23:56, William Speirs wrote:
> I was able to get past the hanging issue, but I'm not in a bet
On Dec 12, 2011, at 8:36 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> We keep on maintaining 1.5.x, that is very good :)
>
> But, I for one, am tired of not having generics and do not feel like
> rushing 2.0 just to get them.
>
I think we are actually pretty close on 2.0. I think it's best to p
I was able to get past the hanging issue, but I'm not in a better
place. I've added my passphrase to my settings.xml file (which I hate
to do), but it reports now that my passphrase is bad. Enabling
debugging I see:
INFO] [DEBUG] Configuring mojo
'org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:1.4:sign
I'm on a Linux box running gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.10.
I'll look into those directions... thanks.
Bill-
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The last time I ran into something like this I did not have some security
> setting just right, maybe something about GPG on Windows, sorry I c
The last time I ran into something like this I did not have some security
setting just right, maybe something about GPG on Windows, sorry I cannot
recall the dets.
But, I follow these steps for the releases I manage:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Gary
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:19 P
I am attempting to release RC1 of commons-dbutils. I was working
through the directions found here:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases I got to step C.1 and
ran the following command: mvn -Prc release:prepare That command
however froze part of the way through. The output is at the end
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-exec-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This i
On 13 December 2011 00:02, sebb wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 21:07, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/12/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies o
On 12 December 2011 21:07, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Phil,
thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
am currently in the situ
Le 12/12/2011 23:03, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> One more day on this...
>
> Anyone else willing to vote?
>
> Phil
>
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> This is a patch release, including a couple of bug fixes.
>>
>> The release artifacts are here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~
Well if you wanna get all mathematical about it, what you're actually
talking about is in addition operation. In functor-speak it would be a
binary function.
On Dec 12, 2011 12:35 PM, "Simone Tripodi" wrote:
> Hi James!
> yes, actual Dijkstra implementation[1] uses Double number to
> accumulatin
One more day on this...
Anyone else willing to vote?
Phil
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> This is a patch release, including a couple of bug fixes.
>
> The release artifacts are here:
> http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.7-rc3/
>
> Release notes:
> http://people.ap
On 12/12/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi Phil,
>>> thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
>>> am currently in the situation I need it - of course in the meantime I
>>> can
On 12/12/2011 20:14, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 1:08 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> I haven't kept up-to-date to GKOP and GOP development for a while, so
>> if you feel confident about current state, I trust you :)
>
> Please do dive in and have a look. This is all new code for 2.
On 12 December 2011 19:42, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi Phil,
>> thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
>> am currently in the situation I need it - of course in the meantime I
>> can work with snapshots, but having a releas
On 12/12/11 1:08 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> I haven't kept up-to-date to GKOP and GOP development for a while, so
> if you feel confident about current state, I trust you :)
Please do dive in and have a look. This is all new code for 2.0 and
we could really use more eyeballs and testi
Hi Phil,
I haven't kept up-to-date to GKOP and GOP development for a while, so
if you feel confident about current state, I trust you :)
I'll certainly give a help to work toward the release!
All the best, have a nice day!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejou
On 12/12/11 12:29 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi Phil,
> thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
> am currently in the situation I need it - of course in the meantime I
> can work with snapshots, but having a release would be definitively
> better :)
>
> So I start fi
Hi Phil,
thanks for the feedbacks! I would put some energies on [pool2] since I
am currently in the situation I need it - of course in the meantime I
can work with snapshots, but having a release would be definitively
better :)
So I start filling an issue and update synchronized pools in
PoolUtils
On 12/12/11 10:56 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/12/11 10:26 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> time ago we spoke about replacing the synchronized blocks inside
>> pools, maybe using different strategies like Java5 Read/Write lock (I
>> remind you Pool2 requires Java5) and I just started
On 12/12/11 10:26 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> time ago we spoke about replacing the synchronized blocks inside
> pools, maybe using different strategies like Java5 Read/Write lock (I
> remind you Pool2 requires Java5) and I just started playing with
> PoolUtils with the SynchronizedO
Hi James!
yes, actual Dijkstra implementation[1] uses Double number to
accumulating the total path weights...
I think Having an accumulator would be helpful! How do you would
modify the current implementation - even with pseudo-code?
TIA, all the best,
-Simo
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/c
Why do you need doubles for Dijkstra? Accumulating the total path
weights? Why not introduce an Accumulator interface?
On Dec 12, 2011 9:32 AM, "Claudio Squarcella"
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/12/2011 05:39, James Carman wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I was on my phone before when I sent that. Let me elaborate
Hi all guys,
time ago we spoke about replacing the synchronized blocks inside
pools, maybe using different strategies like Java5 Read/Write lock (I
remind you Pool2 requires Java5) and I just started playing with
PoolUtils with the SynchronizedObjectPool[1] inner class...
Can we discuss about intro
On 12/12/2011 15:34, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Terrific feedback Matthew, thanks a lot!
and glad to see researchers here :)
Thank you indeed :)
I'll take that as valuable input.
Claudio
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.c
Terrific feedback Matthew, thanks a lot!
and glad to see researchers here :)
best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Matthew Pocock
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hav
Hi,
On 12/12/2011 05:39, James Carman wrote:
Sorry, I was on my phone before when I sent that. Let me elaborate a
bit more. I would just allow the weights to be of any type. However,
you can create two different types of scenarios where you either use a
Comparable derivative or you use whatev
Hi,
I have tended to find that edge weights always follow the following laws:
They have a monoid:
There is a zero (0) constant and a |+| operator for combining two weights.
They have an equivalence and (compatible) ordering relations (>, =):
The ordering is compatible with the monoid. For examp
The following votes were cast:
Henri Biestro +1
Christian Grobmeier +1
Gary Gregory +1
Simone Tripodi +1
Sebastian Bazley +1
All the above are members of the Commons PMC.
There being at least 3 +1 PMC votes, and more +1 than -1, the vote passes.
Thanks to all who voted; I will proceed with the
34 matches
Mail list logo
