Hi,
following Greg's suggestion, here is a first attempt at summarizing
what I understood from the previous discussions regarding
RealVector/RealMatrix interfaces. If we finally drop the matter, as
suggested by Phil, this will be just that: a summary. Otherwise, maybe
this list could be moved to a
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11712&projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Thu 25 Aug 2011 05:31:56 +
Finished at: Thu 25 Aug 2011 05:32:17 +
Total time: 20s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build N
There is a lot to like in the WalkInOrder* set of methods. However, it is
also very constricting. What if I want to set a whole row with a
Arrays.copyTo() call? Also, the interface is a push interface. Data is
pushed to the delegate. This is very troublesome to me. I might need random
access to the
On 8/24/11 7:27 PM, Greg Sterijevski wrote:
> Before we fill JIRA with a bunch of point-counterpoint comments. Perhaps we
> can organize our ideas on the list first?
>
> Using Gille's organization:
>
> * Consistency in naming and make explicit the rationale for choosing one or
> another naming s
Before we fill JIRA with a bunch of point-counterpoint comments. Perhaps we
can organize our ideas on the list first?
Using Gille's organization:
* Consistency in naming and make explicit the rationale for choosing one or
another naming scheme
What methods are inconsistently named? Name the m
On 25 August 2011 02:12, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> According to their respective sites, the following plugins can be updated
> while keeping builds running on Maven 2.0.x and JDK 1.4.
(See below - I don't think that restriction is necessary)
> maven-antrun-plugin 1.5 to 1.6 (Maven 2.0.6,
Hi All:
According to their respective sites, the following plugins can be updated
while keeping builds running on Maven 2.0.x and JDK 1.4.
maven-antrun-plugin 1.5 to 1.6 (Maven 2.0.6, JDK 1.4)
maven-clean-plugin 2.4 to 2.4.1 (Maven 2.0.6, JDK 1.4)
maven-deploy-plugin 2.5 to 2.6 (Maven 2.0.6, JDK
Thanks for all the hard work guys. I'm really looking forward to using VFS2
in a couple of the projects that I'm working on.
Regards,
Mark Fortner
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The 1.1-SNAPSHOT site is still up. 2.0 coming soon!
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:
Am 20.08.2011 21:21, schrieb Oliver Heger:
In CONFIGURATION-459 the user guide has been re-written so that
ConfigurationFactory is no more mentioned.
Do we all agree that ConfigurationFactory should be deprectated in favor
of DefaultConfigurationBuilder? Should we do the deprecation in the
upcom
On 8/24/11 6:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> The UnmodifiableVector class contains the following method:
>
> /** {@inheritDoc} */
> public RealVector add(RealVector w) {
> return v.add(w);
> }
>
> This looks like it would update the vector.
The name may be a little mislead
+1 to 1.6
Julius
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Matthew Pocock
wrote:
> My vote (not that I have one) would be for 1.6, and to keep 2.0 as the
> release when the breaking changes are introduced.
>
> Matthew
>
> On 23 August 2011 09:18, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi all guys,
>> I'd suggest to
Hi all,
I was just browsing through StringUtils Api (versions 2.5, 2.6 and
3.0.1) and found two very similar looking methods
chomp(String,String)
and
removeEnd(String, String)
So I started to wonder what is the difference here and looked at the
source code.
To my astonishment the only differenc
The UnmodifiableVector class contains the following method:
/** {@inheritDoc} */
public RealVector add(RealVector w) {
return v.add(w);
}
This looks like it would update the vector.
It is only by tracing the code that one discovers that the add()
method takes a
The 1.1-SNAPSHOT site is still up. 2.0 coming soon!
Gary
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Commons VFS
> 2.0
>
> Details of the changes and bug fixes in this release can be found in
> the release notes:
> http://w
The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of Commons VFS 2.0
Details of the changes and bug fixes in this release can be found in
the release notes:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/vfs/RELEASE_NOTES.txt
For information on Commons VFS please visit the VFS website:
http://co
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 02:12:33AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> I think this is already implemented as
> walkInXXXOrder(RealMatrixChangingVisitor). I thought it would be handy
> (and consistent with RealVector) to have this very method, but it's
> true a RealMatrixChangingVisitorFactory w
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:35:06PM -, l...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: luc
> Date: Tue Aug 23 22:35:06 2011
> New Revision: 1160914
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1160914&view=rev
> Log:
> Changed integration API for consistency with solvers API. Now the main
> convergence
> parame
Hi Matthew!
agreed on such 3rd parties integrations you are speaking about, Google
Guice would suffer the same (I'm not a fan of Spring :P)
Anyway, as you already mentioned, it is a matter of design, IMHO
subclassing those classes wouldn't have a lot of sense, since they are
used to implement a k
Le 24/08/2011 00:59, Greg Sterijevski a écrit :
Should I open a ticket, or do you want to handle this?
Please open a ticket.
For the moment, I am busy in other parts (integration, geometry and ODE)
and don't fiddle with linear algebra.
Luc
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Luc Maisonobewro
20 matches
Mail list logo
