Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11234&projectId=129
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Sun 14 Aug 2011 05:20:55 +
Finished at: Sun 14 Aug 2011 05:23:30 +
Total time: 2m 34s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=11233&projectId=95
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sun 14 Aug 2011 04:20:45 +
Finished at: Sun 14 Aug 2011 04:21:53 +
Total time: 1m 7s
Build Trigger: Schedule
B
On 12 August 2011 20:56, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello All:
>
> For a first cut at generics support in Codec, please checkout the
> branch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/codec/branches/generics
>
> I wrote a migration guide in the root of the project called
> Codec2-Migration.htm.
>
Probably because the RC tag was not copied following the release vote.
On 13 August 2011 22:30, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Why is there no tag in svn for commons-parent version 21?
>
> On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> as you may have noticed, I have started some work in
On 13 August 2011 21:22, James Carman wrote:
> If you change stuff around, you need to change the package name(s),
> right? Otherwise, you could have collisions on the classpath.
Yes, but then everyone using the code will need to edit and recompile.
So best to keep binary compatibility if at al
Why is there no tag in svn for commons-parent version 21?
On Aug 13, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> as you may have noticed, I have started some work in order to prepare a
> release (version 1.7) of [configuration]. I assume this will be the last
> release compatible with Jav
I was waiting for v 2.2 of the release plugin. It was released several weeks
ago.
As it happens I tried to do the release of vfs again last night and it failed
due to changes in the commons parent pom or one of its parents. It doesn't
appear to support multi module projects as the maven-bundl
Gary Gregory wrote:
>Hi All:
>
>Where are we WRT [pool] and generics in a release?
>
>Thank you,
>Gary
>--
>http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>http://garygregory.com/
>http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>--
If you change stuff around, you need to change the package name(s),
right? Otherwise, you could have collisions on the classpath.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2011-08-12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>>
>>> IMHO unless the main package name has t
+1
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> +1.
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> +1 for both sub-votes.
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:13 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta.
>>>
>>> It's not really big enough to warrant
Hi,
as you may have noticed, I have started some work in order to prepare a
release (version 1.7) of [configuration]. I assume this will be the last
release compatible with Java 1.4.
I plan to have a look at the current Jira issues, but I hope there are
no major issues open which have to be
+1
Oliver
Am 13.08.2011 02:13, schrieb sebb:
BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta.
It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP.
IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF.
Can we please vote to:
1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component
2. Offer Commons karma to BSF developers.
+1
Gary
On Aug 12, 2011, at 20:14, "sebb" wrote:
> BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta.
>
> It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP.
>
> IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF.
>
> Can we please vote to:
>
> 1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component
>
> 2. Offer Commons
+1 for both
welcome to commons!!!
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
> +1 to both votes
>
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:13 AM, sebb wrote:
>> BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta.
>>
>> It's not really bi
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
This is really a question for the Commons User list - please ask there.
On 13 August 2011 10:06, bizso09 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if these formats are supported by Sanselan?
>
> Caption-Abstract
> @
> http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/IPTC.html#ApplicationRecord
>
> Regi
+1 to both votes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:13 AM, sebb wrote:
> BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta.
>
> It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP.
>
> IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF.
>
> Can we please vote to:
>
> 1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component
>
> 2. Offer C
Le 13/08/2011 02:13, sebb a écrit :
BSF [1] needs to move out of Jakarta.
It's not really big enough to warrant its own TLP.
IMO Commons would be a good alternative home for BSF.
Can we please vote to:
1. Accept BSF as a Commons Component
2. Offer Commons karma to BSF developers.
The ones w
18 matches
Mail list logo
