Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1` based on RC3

2011-06-03 Thread Phil Steitz
+1 Contents look good. Sigs / hashes are good. Checked source build with Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_24-b07-334-10M3326) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 19.1-b02-334, mixed mode) Nice work! Phil On 6/2/11 12:22 PM, sebb wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Commons

Re: [LANG] change FormatCache.getDateTimeInstance() to use int

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
On 4 June 2011 03:44, Henri Yandell wrote: > Looking more at this one, it looks like the Integer is required as > null is a valid use case. So moving simply to int is out, but > rethinking it seems very doable. I did some work on this, and I think we can add another style value which means don't

Re: JIRA report usefulness (was: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1 based on RC3)

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
On 3 June 2011 21:54, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 6/3/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 3 June 2011 20:48, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 3 June 2011 19:21, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1. > > I would like to see the JIRA report be only for this re

Re: [LANG] change FormatCache.getDateTimeInstance() to use int

2011-06-03 Thread Henri Yandell
Looking more at this one, it looks like the Integer is required as null is a valid use case. So moving simply to int is out, but rethinking it seems very doable. Note that this isn't a public API; FormatCache is for now a refactoring out of FastDateFormat to allow a later FastDateParser. I've add

Re: JIRA report usefulness (was: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1 based on RC3)

2011-06-03 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/3/11 7:27 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >>> I think that is also best practice - resolve when fixed in SVN, >>> close when fix version is released. >>> >> I couldn't agree more!!! +1! > I just close directly. The resolve then close is a wo

Re: JIRA report usefulness (was: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1 based on RC3)

2011-06-03 Thread Henri Yandell
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> >> I think that is also best practice - resolve when fixed in SVN, >> close when fix version is released. >> > > I couldn't agree more!!! +1! I just close directly. The resolve then close is a workflow waiting for a reason :) Hen

Re: [DIGESTER][SANDBOX] back proposing the Digester3 merge to trunk

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi again guys, Clirr report has been updated and re-published[1]; I followed the Seb's path, with the small difference that using the Sonatype's jarjar plugin, it is possible repackage classes in a separated dir, inside the same main pom[2], without decompressing the shaded jar. I also updated all

Re: JIRA report usefulness (was: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1 based on RC3)

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
> > I think that is also best practice - resolve when fixed in SVN, > close when fix version is released. > I couldn't agree more!!! +1! http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: d

Re: JIRA report usefulness (was: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1 based on RC3)

2011-06-03 Thread Phil Steitz
On 6/3/11 1:15 PM, sebb wrote: > On 3 June 2011 20:48, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, sebb wrote: >> >>> On 3 June 2011 19:21, Gary Gregory wrote: +1. I would like to see the JIRA report be only for this release instead of >>> the whole pile. >>> That'

Re: JIRA report usefulness (was: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1 based on RC3)

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 I agree, due to our policy to manage Issues, the jira-report is not very useful Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:15 PM, sebb wrote: > On 3 June 2011 20:48, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, sebb wrote: >> >

JIRA report usefulness (was: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1 based on RC3)

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
On 3 June 2011 20:48, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 3 June 2011 19:21, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > +1. >> > >> > I would like to see the JIRA report be only for this release instead of >> the >> > whole pile. >> >> That's the default setting for the plugi

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1` based on RC3

2011-06-03 Thread Gary Gregory
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:53 PM, sebb wrote: > On 3 June 2011 19:21, Gary Gregory wrote: > > +1. > > > > I would like to see the JIRA report be only for this release instead of > the > > whole pile. > > That's the default setting for the plugin. > Not a very useful default then :( Running vs. t

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1` based on RC3

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
On 3 June 2011 19:21, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1. > > I would like to see the JIRA report be only for this release instead of the > whole pile. That's the default setting for the plugin. I'd not noticed the report before. Not sure it's all that useful - hardly any other components use it: ./sandb

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1` based on RC3

2011-06-03 Thread Gary Gregory
+1. I would like to see the JIRA report be only for this release instead of the whole pile. Shouldn't the Clirr report be vs. 3.0 instead of 2.2? My set up: Apache Maven 3.0.3 (r1075438; 2011-02-28 12:31:09-0500) Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.3\bin\.. Java version: 1.6.0_24, vendor: Sun

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 3.0.1` based on RC3

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 very nice release, everything looks really good, congrats!!! http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:22 PM, sebb wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 3.0.1 based on RC3. > > Very little has changed since 3.0; the release is b

Re: svn commit: r1131071 [1/2] - in /commons/proper/pool/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/pool2/ java/org/apache/commons/pool2/impl/ test/org/apache/commons/pool2/ test/org/apache/commons/pool2/impl

2011-06-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/06/2011 16:23, ma...@apache.org wrote: > Author: markt > Date: Fri Jun 3 15:23:29 2011 > New Revision: 1131071 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1131071&view=rev > Log: > KeyedObjectPool re-factoring > - remove deprecation of setFactory > - rename maxActive to maxTotalPerKey > -

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Just uploaded the new version, we just need to wait until it is synced On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > OK thanks, so it can stay as I committed it :) > Thanks for your help!!! > Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Fri, Jun

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
OK thanks, so it can stay as I committed it :) Thanks for your help!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:43 PM, sebb wrote: > On 3 June 2011 13:34, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Done :) Site now needs to be re-deployed >> The only trouble

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Rene Gielen
OK - JPEG does not work either. Last spam for today, here's a link https://skitch.com/rgielen/fn43g/sent-gielen-it-neering.net - René On 03.06.11 14:09, Rene Gielen wrote: > Hrm, seems like mailman ate the included PNG previes - trying again with > a JPEG attachment > > On 03.06.11 14:04, Rene

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Rene Gielen
On 03.06.11 14:28, sebb wrote: > On 3 June 2011 13:22, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi Rene!!! >> thanks a lot for helping us :) > > +1 > >> You can attach logos to imageshack[1] >> for preview purposes, or to the already open Jira Issue[2] once your >> proposal is definitive :) > > Remember that t

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Rene Gielen
New draft, including "commons" and "TM" uploaded to JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-15 - René On 03.06.11 14:36, Gary Gregory wrote: > Don't all commons logo say "Commons Foo" and not just "Foo"? > > Gary > > On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:30, Rene Gielen wrote: > >> I've already writt

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
On 3 June 2011 13:34, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Done :) Site now needs to be re-deployed > The only trouble I have is that if the tense "sponsored by the Apache > Incubator" should be replaced by "sponsored by the Apache Commons" or > maybe I just misunderstood the use of sponsor in different contex

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Rene Gielen
/me blind & dumb Attached to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-15 On 03.06.11 14:37, sebb wrote: > On 3 June 2011 13:29, Rene Gielen wrote: >> I've already written a third mail, but I think it waits for moderation >> (wrong sender address) - ok, next try: >> >> https://skitch.com/rgiel

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
On 3 June 2011 13:36, Rene Gielen wrote: > On 03.06.11 14:28, sebb wrote: >> On 3 June 2011 13:22, Simone Tripodi wrote: >>> Hi Rene!!! >>> thanks a lot for helping us :) >> >> +1 >> >>> You can attach logos to imageshack[1] >>> for preview purposes, or to the already open Jira Issue[2] once your

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
On 3 June 2011 13:29, Rene Gielen wrote: > I've already written a third mail, but I think it waits for moderation > (wrong sender address) - ok, next try: > > https://skitch.com/rgielen/fn43g/sent-gielen-it-neering.net > > JIRA won't work for now, since there is an upload limit of 10k Huh? The at

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Rene Gielen
On 03.06.11 14:28, sebb wrote: > On 3 June 2011 13:22, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi Rene!!! >> thanks a lot for helping us :) > > +1 > >> You can attach logos to imageshack[1] >> for preview purposes, or to the already open Jira Issue[2] once your >> proposal is definitive :) > > Remember that t

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Gary Gregory
Don't all commons logo say "Commons Foo" and not just "Foo"? Gary On Jun 3, 2011, at 8:30, Rene Gielen wrote: > I've already written a third mail, but I think it waits for moderation > (wrong sender address) - ok, next try: > > https://skitch.com/rgielen/fn43g/sent-gielen-it-neering.net > > JIR

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Done :) Site now needs to be re-deployed The only trouble I have is that if the tense "sponsored by the Apache Incubator" should be replaced by "sponsored by the Apache Commons" or maybe I just misunderstood the use of sponsor in different context. Please let me know, may thanks in advance! Simo h

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Rene Gielen
I've already written a third mail, but I think it waits for moderation (wrong sender address) - ok, next try: https://skitch.com/rgielen/fn43g/sent-gielen-it-neering.net JIRA won't work for now, since there is an upload limit of 10k - René On 03.06.11 14:22, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rene!!! >

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
right. going to add it NOW thanks for you help Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:24 PM, sebb wrote: > I could not find any mention of the Incubator on the website. > > All incubating projects must have a prominent disclaimer, and shou

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
On 3 June 2011 13:22, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rene!!! > thanks a lot for helping us :) +1 > You can attach logos to imageshack[1] > for preview purposes, or to the already open Jira Issue[2] once your > proposal is definitive :) Remember that the logos we display should have a small "TM" ple

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread sebb
I could not find any mention of the Incubator on the website. All incubating projects must have a prominent disclaimer, and should link back to the main Incubator web-site [1] See for example http://incubator.apache.org/lucy/ http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/ http://incubator.apache.org/rave/

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Rene!!! thanks a lot for helping us :) You can attach logos to imageshack[1] for preview purposes, or to the already open Jira Issue[2] once your proposal is definitive :) Thanks a lot in advance, have a nice day! Simo [1] http://imageshack.us/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-15

Re: [OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Rene Gielen
Hrm, seems like mailman ate the included PNG previes - trying again with a JPEG attachment On 03.06.11 14:04, Rene Gielen wrote: > Hey guys, > > after a small Twitter conversation with Christian about the ONGL site > and the missing logo, I fired up Gimp and quickly drafted what came > first into

[OGNL INCUBATOR] Logo Draft

2011-06-03 Thread Rene Gielen
Hey guys, after a small Twitter conversation with Christian about the ONGL site and the missing logo, I fired up Gimp and quickly drafted what came first into my mind. Christian asked me to post it here, so here it is :) Cheers, René -- René Gielen http://twitter.com/rgielen <><><>

Re: [math] Iterative linear solvers JIRA MATH-581

2011-06-03 Thread Sébastien Brisard
That's great. There's not much yet, really. It's more of a framework based on the discussions we've already had. Once this framework has been agreed upon, I'll commit some more serious stuff. Sébastien aka "Stéphane" ;) - To unsub

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2011-06-03 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Grobmeier
New website is synced: http://incubator.apache.org/ognl/ Well, don't know about your aesthetic feelings but we could do it ourselves with Gimp? It wil be ugly of course, but we change it later if a designer wants to offer some spare time :-) On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Dear mates, I already filled an Issue[1] this morning for the missing logo - because we still don't have one :P Time ago I proposed on ML to open a contest on some webdesign site, but didn't find any website that encourage designers doing it just for opensource instead for money... do you have any

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
OK, it's a good starting point anyway. On 3 June 2011 12:24, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> What kind of problem you are talking about? > > minor stuff, logo missing for example. Just wanted to express I didn't > check in detail and there is a few stuff we need to fix later > > ---

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Grobmeier
> What kind of problem you are talking about? minor stuff, logo missing for example. Just wanted to express I didn't check in detail and there is a few stuff we need to fix later - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Thank you Christian, What kind of problem you are talking about? On 3 June 2011 11:55, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > i have created the current website and deployed it to > http://incubator.apache.org/ognl/ > > It will take a while until it is synced. > > Website has some problems, but

Re: [ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
GREAT thanks a lot for taking care of it!!! :) Alles gute, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hello, > > i have created the current website and deployed it to > http://incubator.apache.org/ognl/ > >

[ognl] Website uploaded

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Hello, i have created the current website and deployed it to http://incubator.apache.org/ognl/ It will take a while until it is synced. Website has some problems, but I have uploaded it anyway. Additionally, I have asked at infra if the other podling committers can get write access with adding

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/06/2011 09:34, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Mark, > IIUC, I should get in touch with someone from OpenSymphony and ask > from a dump, right? > Thanks in advance, have a nice day! Yep. Then open an INFRA Jira ticket and either attach the dump (if it isn't too big) or provide a URL to where we c

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mark, IIUC, I should get in touch with someone from OpenSymphony and ask from a dump, right? Thanks in advance, have a nice day! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/06/2011 09:17, Christian Grobmeie

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
The JIRA instance replicated on the web archive website is a static copy of the original one, so every dynamic functions don't work (like exports as xml, etc.) On 3 June 2011 10:30, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 03/06/2011 09:17, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> A good place for this question might be inf

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Mark Thomas
On 03/06/2011 09:17, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > A good place for this question might be infra@a.o - they have done > that several times (guess) No we haven't. All the imports to Jira have been from exports via the admin interface of Jira/Bugzilla. Mark > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Sim

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Christian Grobmeier
A good place for this question might be infra@a.o - they have done that several times (guess) On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all, > Coming back to the original topic of the email: the old OGNL JIRA is > still reachable on web.archive.org[1], does anyone have an idea h

Re: [math] Iterative linear solvers JIRA MATH-581

2011-06-03 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 02/06/2011 14:32, Sébastien Brisard a écrit : Dear all, I've submitted recently some pieces of code relating to iterative linear solvers (see JIRA MATH-581). I vwould be grateful for any feedback you could provide. Should I go on submitting new pieces of code, or do you think it will not fit i

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, Coming back to the original topic of the email: the old OGNL JIRA is still reachable on web.archive.org[1], does anyone have an idea how to grab data from there? Have anice day, Simo [1] http://web.archive.org/web/20090506224020/http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL http://people.apa

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Thanks for the hints Mau, I reported OGNL-14/15 Feel free to assign to yourself! Have a nice day, all the best! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Mau!!! > indeed, we're a little late on this task :P

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Mau!!! indeed, we're a little late on this task :P I'll fill an issue about it. Anyway we need (at least a default one) Logo to put on top right, I don't have any expertise, any volunteer to draw one? many thanks in advance, have a nice day!!! Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http:

Re: [OGNL] the opensymphony.com website is no more active

2011-06-03 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
What about to publish the OGNL website at http://incubator.apache.org/ognl/ (users ask where is located OGNL docs in the Struts User ML) ? On 1 June 2011 00:06, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote: > Hi Simone, > I have just realized that it looks like the ognl site contains the old doc > reference > > Mau