sebb wrote:
> On 20 May 2011 00:48, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
I don't see an issue. Reality is that we generally just couldn't come
up with good logos back in year dot :)
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Joerg,
> yes indeed, but looks like there is at least an exception
> (commons-math) that is more original.
> Would it be an issu
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 20 May 2011 00:48, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
"each committe
2011/5/20 Gilles Sadowski :
> Hello.
>
>> following our previous discussions, I'm ready to commit some code regarding
>> iterative linear solvers. I've read through the Apache web pages on the
>> subject, but I still have some very silly questions (I do apologize in
>> advance).
>> 1. Checkstyle co
sebb wrote:
> On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>>
>>> "each committer who commits to a component must add their name to th
On 19 May 2011 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>
>> "each committer who commits to a component must add their name to the
>> STATUS file" (
Hello.
> following our previous discussions, I'm ready to commit some code regarding
> iterative linear solvers. I've read through the Apache web pages on the
> subject, but I still have some very silly questions (I do apologize in
> advance).
> 1. Checkstyle complains about a missing version numb
> I do not see why this entire project would need to go to 1.5 or 1.6, unless
> Generics are
> added to the core interface. The maven.compile.target property could be set
> on the different
> modules, so that the core interface is compiled for 1.4.2 and the JSR199 code
> is compiled for 1.6.
T
Dear all,
following our previous discussions, I'm ready to commit some code regarding
iterative linear solvers. I've read through the Apache web pages on the
subject, but I still have some very silly questions (I do apologize in
advance).
1. Checkstyle complains about a missing version number in my
+1 to changelog-plugin, it would be nice having the svn activity published :)
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/5/19 Gary Gregory :
>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
>> wrote:
2011/5/19 Gary Gregory :
> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> > On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> >> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>
>
> +1
>
> It should not be a rule.
>
> Does anyone know Maven eno
Is it wrong to assume that a Range is always a 2-dimensional set? Can
ranges ever be Nth dimensional?
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Pocock <
> turingatemyhams...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Range is not a sub-type of pair. You can think
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Matthew Pocock <
turingatemyhams...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Range is not a sub-type of pair. You can think of a pair as being an
> ordered
> set of 2 items. A Range is a contiguous set defined by a lower and upper
> bound (which may or may not be inclusive). Given some
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> *grumbles that they were ints and a previous RC candidate saw it
> change to Range* :)
>
Change it back! ;)
Gary
>
> My bigger complaint is the explicit casting required to pass in chars:
>
>new UnicodeEscaper(Range.between(0, (int
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
wrote:
> On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>
+1
It should not be a rule.
Does anyone know Maven enough to write a "svn-report" like there is a
On 05/19/11 06:34, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 5/18/11 9:36 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> The following rule seems unnecessary to me:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsEtiquette#Commons_Etiquette
>>
>> "each committer who commits to a component must add their name to the
>> STATUS file" (or p
I doubt that the boxing will be a major performance problem. Moreover,
its one that will have to be solved for JDK 8 anyway (as Project
Lambda needs some kind of solution to enhance primitive/object
operations).
If the cast is a problem, why not have four versions of the operation
- Integer, Char,
Hi Joerg,
yes indeed, but looks like there is at least an exception
(commons-math) that is more original.
Would it be an issue having custom logos? I didn't find a proper
policy about it, but I should have overlooked some detail.
Please let me know!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
ht
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> OGNL site is quite ready to be put online, anyway we still miss a nice
> logo! :) I just noticed that the Lucene.Net community promoted the nice
> initiative of a contest[1] on 99designs, what do you think about
> opening a context for OGNL logo too? Would it
>>> If someone goes and
>>> keeps on working stuff ... well ... then that status is nullified by
>>> merit. (not through a single commit though) I don't see a reason to
>>> forbid svn access
>
> dormancy should be a "lean status" easy to change into sandbox or
> active component. dormancy should be
Hi Joerg!
that signature is forced by implementing Map#putAll(Map)[1] method, I
didn't realize how to avoid the String extension, any contribution is
welcome!
Dankeshen, alles gute!
Simo
[1]
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/Map.html#putAll(java.util.Map)
http://people.apach
23 matches
Mail list logo
