Stupid question: Is there any reason for not using the 3.x site plugin
with Maven 2?
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:08 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with Maven
> 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
>
> See
> http://maven.apach
Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Jörg Schaible
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Gary,
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>> > In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with
>>> > Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Mave
This votes has passed with six +1 binding votes from the following people:
Jochen Wiedmann
Henri Yandell
Simone Tripodi
Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe
Jörg Schaible
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> +1
>
> Simone
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gary,
>>
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> > In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with
>> > Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
>> >
>> > See
>> >
>> http://ma
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with
> > Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
> >
> > See
> >
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin-3.0-be
On 11 March 2011 01:17, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
>> any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
>> Nexus this is an issue.
>
> AFAIK, that's not something that was cha
Hi Gary,
Gary Gregory wrote:
> In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with
> Maven 2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
>
> See
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin-3.0-beta-3/maven-3.html
>
> If you want to look at the parent POM, look for:
>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 11 March 2011 01:43, wrote:
> > Author: ggregory
> > Date: Fri Mar 11 01:43:28 2011
> > New Revision: 1080421
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080421&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Add maven-compiler-plugin with UTF-8
> >
> > Modified:
> >
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=4197&projectId=70
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Fri 11 Mar 2011 01:56:22 +
Finished at: Fri 11 Mar 2011 01:56:39 +
Total time: 17s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build Nu
On 11 March 2011 01:43, wrote:
> Author: ggregory
> Date: Fri Mar 11 01:43:28 2011
> New Revision: 1080421
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080421&view=rev
> Log:
> Add maven-compiler-plugin with UTF-8
>
> Modified:
> commons/proper/codec/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: commons/proper/co
On 10 March 2011 22:32, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
> any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
> Nexus this is an issue.
AFAIK, that's not something that was changed between 18 => 19 is it?
When did it last
On 10 March 2011 22:24, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9
The "rc" profile doesn't seem to create the source/binary assemblies
any more. Not sure what's caused this, but for releases not using
Nexus this is an issue.
Niall
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 4:57 PM, sebb wrote:
> I'm abandoning this vote, because changes are needed to skin:
> - logos now mostly h
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On We
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
>>
In [paren] v18, we have a nice trick to use maven-site-plugin 2.x with Maven
2.x and maven-site-plugin 3.x with Maven 3.x .
See
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-site-plugin-3.0-beta-3/maven-3.html
If you want to look at the parent POM, look for:
maven-3
But, this does not work.
Hi Seb,
since we're discussing about it, I think it could be a good idea
distributing an artifact containing the assembly descriptors to
generate required binary packages for downloads, as described on[1],
and declare the assembly plugin directly in the commons-parent.
Components that need extra de
I'm abandoning this vote, because changes are needed to skin:
- logos now mostly have TMs, so need to change default
and parent
- don't claim Commons as a trademark
I'll start a new vote later.
If there are any other issues which have not been reported, please do
so ASAP so I can incorporate any
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:19:23PM +, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 14:05, wrote:
> > Author: erans
> > Date: Thu Mar 10 14:05:32 2011
> > New Revision: 1080231
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080231&view=rev
> > Log:
> > MATH-542
> > Added custom "writeObject" and "readObject
I just saw that, yes. I am just making the ball keeps moving... :)
Gary
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:39 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 14:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > I am getting no action so far on:
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access
> For
> > Commo
On 10 March 2011 14:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I am getting no action so far on:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access For
> Commons Codec"
>
> Can people interested in [codec] vote for it please?
Patience ... the issue has recently been assigned.
> --
> Thank
I am getting no action so far on:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access For
Commons Codec"
Can people interested in [codec] vote for it please?
--
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http:
On 10 March 2011 14:12, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 1
I am getting no action so far on:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498 "Enable Nexus Access For
Commons Codec"
Can people interested in [codec] vote for it please?
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
> > On 10
On 10 March 2011 14:05, wrote:
> Author: erans
> Date: Thu Mar 10 14:05:32 2011
> New Revision: 1080231
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1080231&view=rev
> Log:
> MATH-542
> Added custom "writeObject" and "readObject" so that serialization can
> proceed even if non-"Serializable" objects
Hi.
> >>> [...]
> >>> You are right, I am stupid. So we have to check for serializable.
> >>
> >> I don't see why: The serialization will work provided all "Object"
> >> arguments are "Serializable"; it is the user's code responsibility to not
> >> try serializing the exception when it knows that
On 2011-03-10 15:01, sebb wrote:
> On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 201
On 10 March 2011 13:46, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote
On Mar 10, 2011, at 8:47, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
> On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
> wr
On 2011-03-10 00:36, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
33 matches
Mail list logo
