On 10 March 2011 00:20, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2011, at 2:47 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 5 March 2011 08:10, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 4, 2011, at 7:49 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>
On 4 March 2011 08:26, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Yeah - as soon as I can find a few minutes and get over m
On Mar 5, 2011, at 2:47 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 March 2011 08:10, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2011, at 7:49 AM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 4 March 2011 08:26, Ralph Goers wrote:
Yeah - as soon as I can find a few minutes and get over my frustration at
having to manually generate r
On 9 March 2011 12:01, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:20 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory
On Mar 9, 2011, at 16:04, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
>> Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said
>> it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to
>> get that confirmed on maven-dev) and it wil
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said
> it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to
> get that confirmed on maven-dev) and it will only break things for
> other users without real gain. A
Le 09/03/2011 16:55, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> Hi Gilles,
>
> Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:00:07PM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 09/03/2011 13:59, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
Hi.
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Or make the fields transient?
>>>
>>> Tha
On Mar 9, 2011, at 2:05 PM, dev.tom.menzel wrote:
> hi,
>
> does my explaination satisfy u and u deem this ok?
> and if yes: what is the next step?
> shall I provide a patch? open an issue?
>
Hello, Tom. We Commons developers are taking the stance that general-purpose
exceptions don't have a
hi,
does my explaination satisfy u and u deem this ok?
and if yes: what is the next step?
shall I provide a patch? open an issue?
-Original Message-
From: thomas menzel [mailto:dev.tom.men...@gmx.net]
Sent: Montag, 14. Februar 2011 19:16
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] pr
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:27 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 18:59, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9 March 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> > FWIW, I found the TM too ugly for my taste and started updating the
> >> > commons
> >> > logos..
On 9 March 2011 18:59, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> On 9 March 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > FWIW, I found the TM too ugly for my taste and started updating the
>> > commons
>> > logos...
>>
>> I've changed the font size to be similar to the one
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > FWIW, I found the TM too ugly for my taste and started updating the
> commons
> > logos...
>
> I've changed the font size to be similar to the one you used. I
> manually changed the positioning to place
On 9 March 2011 18:20, Gary Gregory wrote:
> FWIW, I found the TM too ugly for my taste and started updating the commons
> logos...
I've changed the font size to be similar to the one you used. I
manually changed the positioning to place it close to the embedded one
- see this screenshot:
http:/
FWIW, I found the TM too ugly for my taste and started updating the commons
logos...
Gary
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:14 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 16:33, Ralph Goers wrote:
> > All I did was "mvn site:stage -DstagingDirectory="/Users/rgoers/vfssite".
> >
> > Without doing mvn site:stage t
On 9 March 2011 16:33, Ralph Goers wrote:
> All I did was "mvn site:stage -DstagingDirectory="/Users/rgoers/vfssite".
>
> Without doing mvn site:stage the site you generated can't possibly be
> correct. You won't be able to navigate to any of the subprojects.
True, but it's only inter-project li
All I did was "mvn site:stage -DstagingDirectory="/Users/rgoers/vfssite".
Without doing mvn site:stage the site you generated can't possibly be correct.
You won't be able to navigate to any of the subprojects.
I'll do a mvn clean and try it again, but I can't do it until tonight. (at
least 12 h
@Ralph (mainly)
I've taken a look at the site you zipped up and sent to me privately.
It does not have any of the changes, so it looks like the updated
parent and skin were somehow not being picked up.
I updated my copy of VFS to the current trunk, and replaced the POM
with the one you sent me.
Some users wish to have a release of Commons Daemon via Maven.
So have I extracted the binary, javadoc and source jars from the 1.0.5
binary release, and created a bundle which has been uploaded to:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-005/commons-daemon/commons-dae
Hi Gilles,
Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:00:07PM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 09/03/2011 13:59, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
>> > Hi.
>> >
>> [...]
>>
>> Or make the fields transient?
>>
>> That would perhaps cause problems if the Exceptions were
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:00:07PM +0100, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 09/03/2011 13:59, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> > Hi.
> >
> [...]
>
> Or make the fields transient?
>
> That would perhaps cause problems if the Exceptions were ever
> serialised, but can that happen?
>
Safari.
On Mar 9, 2011, at 3:10 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 11:07, sebb wrote:
>> On 9 March 2011 08:12, Ralph Goers wrote:
>>> After a bit of tweaking I was able to get the site for Commons VFS built.
>>> I didn't see a TM anywhere though.
>>
>> Oh, that't not good.
>>
>> Can you upl
Yep, fine with me, waiting on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3498
Gary
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said
> it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to
> get that confir
Please, let's forget about the relocation nonsense. Noone ever said
it'd be working as expected (for example. sebb has tried heavily to
get that confirmed on maven-dev) and it will only break things for
other users without real gain. After all, what's so terrible if the
group ID isn't what we'd lik
Le 09/03/2011 13:59, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hi.
>
[...]
Or make the fields transient?
That would perhaps cause problems if the Exceptions were ever
serialised, but can that happen?
>>>
>>> Yes, it's a typical JEE scenario and I cannot say how often I cursed Sun
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> It only means that you might have to create a Jira issue which
> requests Nexus permissions for the groupId commons-codec. Quite
> possible that this already exists. For example, I can say for sure
> that such permissions exist for commons-f
Hi.
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> Or make the fields transient?
> >>
> >> That would perhaps cause problems if the Exceptions were ever
> >> serialised, but can that happen?
> >
> > Yes, it's a typical JEE scenario and I cannot say how often I cursed Sun
> > for
> > stuffing an unserializable object int
On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:09, sebb wrote:
> On 8 March 2011 22:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> I also added a TM to the commons-skin's [commons] logo. In SVN.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Can you provide brief details of what you used to add the TM in case
> others want to do it?
> Also what font and size etc did you
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On 9 March 2011 10:30, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>> > Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work,
>>> per
>>> > http:/
On 9 March 2011 11:07, sebb wrote:
> On 9 March 2011 08:12, Ralph Goers wrote:
>> After a bit of tweaking I was able to get the site for Commons VFS built. I
>> didn't see a TM anywhere though.
>
> Oh, that't not good.
>
> Can you upload the site to your personal people dir?
> Or e-mail me a zi
On 8 March 2011 22:32, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I also added a TM to the commons-skin's [commons] logo. In SVN.
Thanks.
Can you provide brief details of what you used to add the TM in case
others want to do it?
Also what font and size etc did you use, so I can change the overlay
accordingly.
> Gar
On 9 March 2011 08:12, Ralph Goers wrote:
> After a bit of tweaking I was able to get the site for Commons VFS built. I
> didn't see a TM anywhere though.
Oh, that't not good.
Can you upload the site to your personal people dir?
Or e-mail me a zip privately (pom+site.xml+site) so I can take a
It only means that you might have to create a Jira issue which
requests Nexus permissions for the groupId commons-codec. Quite
possible that this already exists. For example, I can say for sure
that such permissions exist for commons-fileupload. Just try to deploy
to Nexus and if you get suspicious
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-vfs2 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:34 PM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 9 March 2011 02:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Does having the old style of groupId mean that deploying will not work,
>> per
>> > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus#top
>> >
>> > "All
Hi,
Le 08/03/2011 23:51, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> sebb wrote:
>
>> On 8 March 2011 20:17, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 07/03/2011 11:37, er...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: erans
Date: Mon Mar 7 10:37:52 2011
New Revision: 1078734
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=10
Le 08/03/2011 22:22, Gilles Sadowski a écrit :
> Hello.
Hi Gilles,
>
>>> Modified:
>>> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/math/ode/sampling/DummyStepInterpolatorTest.java
>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/math/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/common
Le 08/03/2011 21:56, sebb a écrit :
> On 8 March 2011 20:17, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> Le 07/03/2011 11:37, er...@apache.org a écrit :
>>> Author: erans
>>> Date: Mon Mar 7 10:37:52 2011
>>> New Revision: 1078734
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1078734&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> MATH-542
>
After a bit of tweaking I was able to get the site for Commons VFS built. I
didn't see a TM anywhere though.
Ralph
On Mar 7, 2011, at 12:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think the time has come to formally vote on the updates to Commons
> Skin and Commons Parent.
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> https://repos
39 matches
Mail list logo
