On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> There have been a couple of bugs fixed since the IO 2.0 release, so I
> would like to release IO 2.0.1
>
> [X ] +1 Yes go ahead an release based on RC1
> [ ] -1 No, because...
>
> IO 2.0.1 RC1 is available for review here:
>
> http://pe
I notice now that in the doco cleanup before pool 1.5, we left one more
inscrutable "feature" of GKOP undocumented, namely the behavior determined
by the clearOldest method added in pool 1.3. This (non-optional) feature
destroys 15% of the "oldest" idle instances in the union of the pools to
"mak
Thanks, Gary!
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
Hm. Perfo already depends on pool. It would be less controversial to add the
> test to perfo but that would not demonstrate the bug in pool itself.
>
I thought about that. That would amount to attaching a [performance]
config f
So, I've created jira MATH-462 for it and attached the patch.
It doesn't contain tests for alpha in (0,1) yet. I'll take a look at R examples
and will try to generate quantiles for some alpha.
On Dec 24, 2010, at 19:07 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Pavel Ryzhov wrote
Hm. Perfo already depends on pool. It would be less controversial to add the
test to perfo but that would not demonstrate the bug in pool itself. I think I
would still depend on perfo.
Gary
On Dec 25, 2010, at 9:03, "Gary Gregory" wrote:
> I would just have this new test depend on [performan
I would just have this new test depend on [performance] and be done with it.
Gary
On Dec 25, 2010, at 0:53, "Phil Steitz" wrote:
> I have found what I think is a bug in GKOP[1] using [performance]. I need
> the functionality in the Waiter and WaiterFactory classes in
> o.a.c.performance.pool
