Re: [VFS] Analysis of binary compatibility breaks between 1.0 and 2.0; release strategy

2010-11-16 Thread Ralph Goers
On Nov 16, 2010, at 4:19 PM, sebb wrote: > On 17 November 2010 00:06, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com > wrote: >> I'm not sure why the tool didn't catch it, but a few methods now return >> Map where they previously returned Map. I didn't check for >> generics other than "Map<". > > Surely these are

[VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3

2010-11-16 Thread sebb
This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2 based on RC3. Changes since RC1 are: - drop unnecessary jars from binary archive - include RELEASE-NOTES in binary and source archives [ ] +1 release it [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care [ ] -1 no, do not release it because... tag: http://svn.apache.or

Re: [math] inconsistent use of random generators

2010-11-16 Thread Ted Dunning
It is also desirable to have a way to inject a test generator so that test cases can be made deterministic. In Mahout, we did this by having a static method in a utility class for getting a standard generator for either testing or normal operation. This has turned out very well. +1 on using a be

Re: [ALL] Why does Javadoc take so long?

2010-11-16 Thread Steven Siebert
Looks like this is already fixed in the trunk... Steve On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:44 PM, sebb wrote: > I think I've discovered the cause. > > Commons Javadoc uses the URL defined in Commons Parent POM: > > http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/ > > Using JMeter to download this URL takes at leas

Re: [ALL] Why does Javadoc take so long?

2010-11-16 Thread sebb
I think I've discovered the cause. Commons Javadoc uses the URL defined in Commons Parent POM: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/ Using JMeter to download this URL takes at least 200 seconds (if it even responds) merely to return a redirect to http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/

Re: [VFS] Analysis of binary compatibility breaks between 1.0 and 2.0; release strategy

2010-11-16 Thread sebb
On 17 November 2010 00:06, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com wrote: > I'm not sure why the tool didn't catch it, but a few methods now return > Map where they previously returned Map. I didn't check for > generics other than "Map<". Surely these are equivalent at run-time? Generics are a compile-time

Re: [math] preparing smooth interface upgrade for users

2010-11-16 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> >> [...] > >> I think this transition is the smoother path for our users. Do you think > >> this change is the way to go ? > > > > -0 > > +1 > > > > > My first impression is that it is a lot of changes for 2.2 without any > > benefit when users will switch to 3.0; they will still have to scan t

Re: [VFS] Analysis of binary compatibility breaks between 1.0 and 2.0; release strategy

2010-11-16 Thread ralph.goers @dslextreme.com
I'm not sure why the tool didn't catch it, but a few methods now return Map where they previously returned Map. I didn't check for generics other than "Map<". Ralph On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:21 PM, sebb wrote: > Clirr reports the following problems when comparing the codebases > (prior to the v

Re: [math] preparing smooth interface upgrade for users

2010-11-16 Thread sebb
On 16 November 2010 23:19, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > Hello. > >> As we are changing a lot of things in 3.0, it would be interesting to >> have 2.2 help users smoothly adapt their code. Many exceptions have/will >> be changed and some of them are used in public interfaces users have to >> implement.

Re: [math] preparing smooth interface upgrade for users

2010-11-16 Thread Gilles Sadowski
Hello. > As we are changing a lot of things in 3.0, it would be interesting to > have 2.2 help users smoothly adapt their code. Many exceptions have/will > be changed and some of them are used in public interfaces users have to > implement. Typical examples are FirstOrderDifferentialEquations and

Re: [math] inconsistent use of random generators

2010-11-16 Thread Gilles Sadowski
> [...] > > What about changing this to be more consistent ? +1 Obviously :-) > [...] Regards, Gilles - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons NET 2.2 based on RC1 - cancelled

2010-11-16 Thread sebb
On 14 November 2010 10:35, sebb wrote: > On 14 November 2010 03:31, Daniel F. Savarese wrote: >> >> In message , >> sebb >>  writes: >>>This is a vote to release Apache Commons NET 2.2. >>>[X ] -1 no, do not release it because... >> >> I object to commons-net-2.2-javadoc.jar and commons-net-2.2-

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jci-core (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-11-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jci-core has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[VFS] Analysis of binary compatibility breaks between 1.0 and 2.0; release strategy

2010-11-16 Thread sebb
Clirr reports the following problems when comparing the codebases (prior to the vfs2 package rename) 1) Selectors: Changed from interface to class This contains only constants. The interface was not actually implemented by any VFS classes; the constants were referenced using the class name If any

[math] inconsistent use of random generators

2010-11-16 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, Some of our algorithms do use random number generation. I quickly reviewed them and found different ways to use them. Genetic algorithm use a single static RandomGenerator shared by all instances. It default to JDKRandomGenerator and can be reset by calling setRandomGenerator. Multi-star

[math] preparing smooth interface upgrade for users

2010-11-16 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hello all, As we are changing a lot of things in 3.0, it would be interesting to have 2.2 help users smoothly adapt their code. Many exceptions have/will be changed and some of them are used in public interfaces users have to implement. Typical examples are FirstOrderDifferentialEquations and the

Re: [MATH] Fwd: [jira] Commented: (MATH-437) Kolmogorov Smirnov Distribution

2010-11-16 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
2010/11/16 : > > - "Mikkel Meyer Andersen" a écrit : > >> Dear developers, > > Hi Mikkel, > >> >> We now have a working implementation of the cdf for the two-sided >> Kolmogorov Smirnov Distribution [1]. What do you think about it? Now >> both rounding (RealMatrix and its cousins) and exact (

Re: [MATH] Fwd: [jira] Commented: (MATH-437) Kolmogorov Smirnov Distribution

2010-11-16 Thread luc . maisonobe
- "Mikkel Meyer Andersen" a écrit : > Dear developers, Hi Mikkel, > > We now have a working implementation of the cdf for the two-sided > Kolmogorov Smirnov Distribution [1]. What do you think about it? Now > both rounding (RealMatrix and its cousins) and exact (using > BigFraction and it