+1, I like the idea of using MBeans too!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
> On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Steven Siebert [mailto:smsi...@gmai
Are there any other multi-module projects in commons where mvn site works?
I've tried off and on to get mvn site to work for a couple of years on a
multi-module project at work and have never succeeded. I may have tried to do
a mvn site when I finished the conversion from ant to maven a while
On 19.10.2010 00:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 18/10/2010 01:22, Benoit Perroud wrote:
2010/10/17 Phil Steitz
On 10/17/10 8:53 AM, Benoit Perroud wrote:
We should talk about why the Tomcat devs decided to implement their own
FairBlockingQueue.
ENOCLUE. There might be something in the Javadoc but
Ugh! We need an expert! :)
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On
> Behalf Of James Carman
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 20:38
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VFS] Build problem
>
> I have version 1024102,
I have version 1024102, but the mvn site fails for me, too (I'm
running maven 3.0) . Here's the output:
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[WARNING]
[WARNING] Some problems were encountered while building the effective
model for org.apache.commons:commons-vfs:jar:2.0-S
NAPSHOT
[WARNING] 'build.plugi
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1173&projectId=71
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Tue 19 Oct 2010 03:20:28 +
Finished at: Tue 19 Oct 2010 03:21:28 +
Total time: 59s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Buil
Hey James,
I have:
>svn up
At revision 1024093.
But I ran "mvn site"
When I run "mvn install" the build is successful.
Can you test "mvn site" on your set up please?
Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
Tel: +1.404.760.
I just did an "svn update" on trunk and ran "mvn install" and it
worked fine for me.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> When I run a maven build, I get:
>
> [INFO] Compiling 14 source files to
> C:\Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\vfs\trunk\sandbox\target\classes
> [I
When I run a maven build, I get:
[INFO] Compiling 14 source files to
C:\Users\ggregory\b\svn\apache.org\commons\vfs\trunk\sandbox\target\classes
[INFO] -
[ERROR] COMPILATION ERROR :
[INFO]
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=1171&projectId=71
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Tue 19 Oct 2010 02:20:35 +
Finished at: Tue 19 Oct 2010 02:22:52 +
Total time: 2m 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Build
Hi Niall,
Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jörg Schaible
> wrote:
>> Hi Niall,
>>
>> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>>> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
>>> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
>>> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and im
On 18/10/2010 08:38, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Has any thought been given to simply rolling the projects into one?
Yes.
-1. Lots of folks use pool that have no interest in databases.
Mark
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/17/10 2:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 18/10/2010 01:22, Benoit Perroud wrote:
> 2010/10/17 Phil Steitz
>
>> On 10/17/10 8:53 AM, Benoit Perroud wrote:
>>
>>> Making pool be able to be resized at runtime will introduce extra
>>> complexity, that could be otherwise totally delegated to a BlockingQueue
>>> as
>>> backend structure.
>
Brian Fox wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Dennis Lundberg
> wrote:
>> When you say consistent, what are you referring to? The fact that lang
>> has done it once?
>>
>> It is not the Maven way to change the artifactId when a new major
>> version comes out. And since we are talking about
On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Steven Siebert [mailto:smsi...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 04:52
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [pool] runtime re-configuration
>>
>> Why not add an (or a small set of) MBean(
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Siebert [mailto:smsi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 04:52
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [pool] runtime re-configuration
>
> Why not add an (or a small set of) MBean(s) to where you can not only manage
> some of the mutable
This vote has passed with five +1 votes (4 binding) from the following people:
Simone Tripodi
Gary Gregory
Rahul Akolkar
Henri Biestro
Niall Pemberton
Thanks for all the feedback and votes - apologies it took 5 RCs
Niall
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I have prepared
+1 from me btw
Niall
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:14 AM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I have prepared Commons IO 2.0 RC5. The main changes since RC4 was to
> rename the FilesystemObserver/Monitor to
> FileAlterationObserver/Monitor and improvements to the test coverage.
>
> The RC3 changes were improve
That's an interesting idea, especially since Jdbc is buitin Java. I think it
would good to at least consider a small scale 'release train' a la Eclipse.
Gary
On Oct 18, 2010, at 6:39, "Paul Benedict" wrote:
> Has any thought been given to simply rolling the projects into one?
>
> On Sun, Oct
On Oct 18, 2010, at 9:38 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Has any thought been given to simply rolling the projects into one?
>
Yes. The project is called *Apache Commons* ;)
Seriously guys, we have to stop talking about "projects" inside Commons. We do
have separate *components* with overlapp
I didn't mean to imply one artifact with my suggestion. I would
continue publishing two artifacts no matter what.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all,
> even if as developer was involved I recently, in therms of APIs, as
> user, I'd prefeer keeping the 2 things separat
Hi all,
even if as developer was involved I recently, in therms of APIs, as
user, I'd prefeer keeping the 2 things separated:
* the pool is a set of APIs with interfaces and some concrete
implementations to create generic pools; i.e. I used it to pool
instances of commons-digester parsers or http
Hi Neil,
I took care of this here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-3068
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> I have added new groupId "commons-daemon" to the
> m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository (previous releases have been published to
> that group id, but not using Mav
Has any thought been given to simply rolling the projects into one?
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/17/10 2:58 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> Shouldnt we talk more across these two projects? Perhaps making sure we
>> have good reuse and cross pollination
>
> Commons is
- "Gilles Sadowski" a écrit :
> Hi.
>
> [This refers to classes in package "optimization.direct".]
> Currently the class "NelderMead" inherits from
> "DirectSearchOptimizer".
> However the method "doOptimize" is _implemented_ in
> "DirectSearchOptimizer".
> This is backwards from the intend
Why not add an (or a small set of) MBean(s) to where you can not only manage
some of the mutable values, but also add the capability to runtime monitor
the pool through jconsole and 3rd party JMX/network monitoring systems?
This would keep the pool API the same, reducing the need for you to maintai
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
28 matches
Mail list logo
