[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-javaflow (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-09-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-id (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-09-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue af

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-15 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread James Carman
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > My preference would be for the sig "getVersion(Class)" > No objections here. That's just what we use. The getVersion() would probably fit better with what we do everywhere else. --

RE: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Gary Gregory
>versionOf(org.hibernate.Session.class); That looks like a nice utility to add to [lang]. My preference would be for the sig "getVersion(Class)" Gary -Original Message- From: jcar...@carmanconsulting.com [mailto:jcar...@carmanconsulting.com] On Behalf Of James Carman Sent: Wednesday, S

Re: [lang] package/manifest utils WAS Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread James Carman
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > > Agreed--I didn't even realize this info was in Package.  On the idea of > manifest reading, though, I still have some code adapted from Ant's manifest > code that does provide manifest access, if we want to polish it into a > ManifestUtil

[lang] package/manifest utils WAS Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Matt Benson
On Sep 15, 2010, at 8:04 AM, James Carman wrote: > We should just add this to commons lang Agreed--I didn't even realize this info was in Package. On the idea of manifest reading, though, I still have some code adapted from Ant's manifest code that does provide manifest access, if we want to

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Simone Tripodi
I personally agree with both Rahul and James. thanks. Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:04 PM, James Carman wrote: > We should just add this to commons lang > > On Sep 15, 2010 9:02 AM, "Rahul Akolkar" wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread James Carman
We should just add this to commons lang On Sep 15, 2010 9:02 AM, "Rahul Akolkar" wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote: >> IMO the thread showed that there are enough ways to get to that >> information today. >> I would not bother and call for the vote. >> > > > +1 to no

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Torsten Curdt wrote: > IMO the thread showed that there are enough ways to get to that > information today. > I would not bother and call for the vote. > +1 to not bothering for digester 2.1. -Rahul > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 14:54, Simone Tripodi > wrote: >>

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Torsten Curdt
IMO the thread showed that there are enough ways to get to that information today. I would not bother and call for the vote. On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 14:54, Simone Tripodi wrote: > I'm going to call a vote for a new Digester release, shall this new > stuff be included in the release? > thanks in a

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Simone Tripodi
I'm going to call a vote for a new Digester release, shall this new stuff be included in the release? thanks in advance, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: >> James Carman wrote: > >> We use a method like

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
> James Carman wrote: > We use a method like this: > > public static String versionOf(Class c) { >   final String version = c.getPackage().getImplementationVersion(); >   return StringUtils.isEmpty(version) ? "n/a" : version; > } > > So, if you want to know what version of Hibernate you're using,

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Jörg Schaible
James Carman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:45 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> I like the idea. >> >> Apache JMeter does the same. >> >> It also includes the last SVN revision of whatever workspace was used >> to build it. >> >> Since the version is available to Maven (or Ant) it could update (or >> pe

Re: [VOTE] Release Digester 2.1 based on RC1

2010-09-15 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi, just to close this thread since the Sebastian's -1 (with reasons!) blocked the RC1. I'll push the RC2 soon. Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi Rahul > Thanks a lot for the suggestions, very apprec

Re: [codec] Koelner Phonetik (cologne phonetic)

2010-09-15 Thread Falk Meyer
Hi Paul, in general the cologne phonetic is for German and metaphone is for English texts, AFAIK. So cologne phonetic takes care about some special cases: "sch" is something like "s", "th" doesn't sound like the English "th" (it simply sounds like "t"), what a "c" sounds like depends strongly on i

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread James Carman
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Hmmm, doesn't provide access to the complete Manifest, but that's not > what we need here. I'd opt to use that, rather than generated classes. > Right, for my particular case, all we cared about was the version from the manifest. So, YAGN

Re: [pool] Start work on 2.0?

2010-09-15 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 14/09/2010 11:17, Benoit Perroud wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Regarding >> >> 1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management >> >> Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util concurrent (JUC) > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:33 PM, James Carman wrote: > The Package class provides access to the manifest information. Hmmm, doesn't provide access to the complete Manifest, but that's not what we need here. I'd opt to use that, rather than generated classes. Jochen -- I Am What I Am And That'

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Torsten Curdt
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 13:23, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:13 PM, James Carman > wrote: > >> What do you mean reliable?  Is it difficult to read a manifest? > > Can you tell me any about any non-trivial way to read it? Apart from > URL manipulation and stuff like that? (Whi

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread James Carman
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > Can you tell me any about any non-trivial way to read it? Apart from > URL manipulation and stuff like that? (Which is, IMO, unreliable, > because it depends on certain assumptions on the URL.) > The Package class provides access to the ma

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:13 PM, James Carman wrote: > What do you mean reliable?  Is it difficult to read a manifest? Can you tell me any about any non-trivial way to read it? Apart from URL manipulation and stuff like that? (Which is, IMO, unreliable, because it depends on certain assumptions

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread James Carman
What do you mean reliable? Is it difficult to read a manifest? On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > I'd generally prefer the idea to read the manifest, in order to avoid > redundant information. However, I am unaware of any reliable manner of > reading the manifest. Hence ve

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
I'd generally prefer the idea to read the manifest, in order to avoid redundant information. However, I am unaware of any reliable manner of reading the manifest. Hence version classes might be the only solution. Jochen - To unsu

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Michael Lieshoff
Am 15.09.2010 12:45, schrieb sebb: On 15 September 2010 09:28, Michael Lieshoff wrote: Hi there, i have problems in big environments where different versions of Apache Commons projects exists, some older and others newer. I think in this case a version class is pretty, contains the version

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, Seb, I would like to suggest to read the manifest, it doesn't require the class generation. Just my 2 cents, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:45 PM, sebb wrote: > On 15 September 2010 09:28, Michael Lieshoff > wrote: >>  H

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread James Carman
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:45 AM, sebb wrote: > > I like the idea. > > Apache JMeter does the same. > > It also includes the last SVN revision of whatever workspace was used > to build it. > > Since the version is available to Maven (or Ant) it could update (or > perhaps create?) the version file a

Re: Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread sebb
On 15 September 2010 09:28, Michael Lieshoff wrote: >  Hi there, > > i have problems in big environments where different versions of Apache > Commons projects exists, some older and others newer. I think in this case a > version class is pretty, contains the version of the project. So a simple > v

Version classes

2010-09-15 Thread Michael Lieshoff
Hi there, i have problems in big environments where different versions of Apache Commons projects exists, some older and others newer. I think in this case a version class is pretty, contains the version of the project. So a simple version request at runtime would be possible and it's not ne

Re: [codec] Koelner Phonetik (cologne phonetic)

2010-09-15 Thread Paul Libbrecht
How does it compare to the Metaphone results? paul Le 15 sept. 2010 à 09:56, Meyer Falk a écrit : > Ok, thank you. There's now an issue at JIRA: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-106 > > Best regards, > Falk > > Am Montag, den 13.09.2010, 08:56 -0400 schrieb James Carman: >> Perha

Re: [codec] Koelner Phonetik (cologne phonetic)

2010-09-15 Thread Meyer Falk
Ok, thank you. There's now an issue at JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-106 Best regards, Falk Am Montag, den 13.09.2010, 08:56 -0400 schrieb James Carman: > Perhaps file a JIRA (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC) and > attach the source. Make sure you check the "Grant