[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-javaflow (in module commons-sandbox) failed

2010-09-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration. This is

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-proxy-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-proxy-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-scxml-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[GUMP@vmgump]: Project commons-io-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-09-14 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This iss

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-14 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all, I got success with the dockbook plugin we already used in Apache Cocoon3 and MyBatis (Apache iBatis), it can produce both site and PDF doc... just my 2 cents, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 6:28 PM, sebb wrote: > On 14 Septe

Re: [BeanUtils] moving the documentation from javadoc to website

2010-09-14 Thread sebb
On 14 September 2010 00:18, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 9/13/10 7:02 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 13 September 2010 11:12, Niall Pemberton >>  wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:05 AM, sebb  wrote: I think it's important to have documentation that can be used offline. This appli

Re: [DAEMON] Delete obsolete directories etc from SVN?

2010-09-14 Thread Mladen Turk
On 09/14/2010 05:08 PM, sebb wrote: Instead native/nt/procrun/apps native/nt/apps etc ... Do you want me to do that? Sure. Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional comman

Re: [DAEMON] Delete obsolete directories etc from SVN?

2010-09-14 Thread sebb
On 14 September 2010 15:54, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 09/14/2010 04:29 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> See: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-160 >> >> There are quite a few obsolete directories in SVN, and the nt/ >> directory is released as windows/ so could be renamed. >> >> Is it OK if I

Re: [DAEMON] Delete obsolete directories etc from SVN?

2010-09-14 Thread Mladen Turk
On 09/14/2010 04:29 PM, sebb wrote: See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-160 There are quite a few obsolete directories in SVN, and the nt/ directory is released as windows/ so could be renamed. Is it OK if I make the changes proposed in DAEMON-160? BTW, how about removing firs

Re: [DAEMON] Delete obsolete directories etc from SVN?

2010-09-14 Thread Mladen Turk
On 09/14/2010 04:29 PM, sebb wrote: There are quite a few obsolete directories in SVN, and the nt/ directory is released as windows/ so could be renamed. Is it OK if I make the changes proposed in DAEMON-160? Have no problem with that. Go ahead. Regards -- ^TM

[DAEMON] Delete obsolete directories etc from SVN?

2010-09-14 Thread sebb
See: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-160 There are quite a few obsolete directories in SVN, and the nt/ directory is released as windows/ so could be renamed. Is it OK if I make the changes proposed in DAEMON-160? I will create a tag (e.g. PRE_DAEMON_160) before starting.

Re: [pool] Start work on 2.0?

2010-09-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/14/10 6:41 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 14/09/2010 11:34, Phil Steitz wrote: On 9/14/10 6:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 14/09/2010 11:17, Benoit Perroud wrote: Dear all, Regarding 1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util

Re: [pool] Start work on 2.0?

2010-09-14 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/09/2010 11:34, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 9/14/10 6:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 14/09/2010 11:17, Benoit Perroud wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> Regarding >>> >>> 1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management >>> >>> Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util concurrent >>>

Re: [pool] Start work on 2.0?

2010-09-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/14/10 6:20 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 14/09/2010 11:17, Benoit Perroud wrote: Dear all, Regarding 1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util concurrent (JUC) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Pool 1.5.5 Released

2010-09-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/14/10 3:46 AM, Grzegorz Słowikowski wrote: Hi Can you create "POOL_1_5_5" tag from "POOL_1_5_5_RC2"? Aargh! Forgot to commit the copied tag. Done now. Thanks! Phil Greetings Grzegorz Slowikowski On 2010-09-11 04:48, Phil Steitz wrote: The Apache Commons team is pleased to annou

Re: [pool] Start work on 2.0?

2010-09-14 Thread Phil Steitz
On 9/14/10 6:17 AM, Benoit Perroud wrote: Dear all, Regarding 1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util concurrent (JUC) ? That is what I meant. I did some tests with BlockingDeque as objects repository (Deque instead of Q

Re: [pool] Start work on 2.0?

2010-09-14 Thread Mark Thomas
On 14/09/2010 11:17, Benoit Perroud wrote: > Dear all, > > Regarding > > 1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management > > Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util concurrent (JUC) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/modules/jdbc-pool/ I'd like to bring these two c

Re: [pool] Start work on 2.0?

2010-09-14 Thread Benoit Perroud
Dear all, Regarding 1) Replace wait/notify with 1.5+ thread management Is there already any work or ideas on how to use Java util concurrent (JUC) ? I did some tests with BlockingDeque as objects repository (Deque instead of Queue to be able to achieve FIFO or LIFO behavior) and AtomicInteger a

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons Pool 1.5.5 Released

2010-09-14 Thread Grzegorz Słowikowski
Hi Can you create "POOL_1_5_5" tag from "POOL_1_5_5_RC2"? Greetings Grzegorz Slowikowski On 2010-09-11 04:48, Phil Steitz wrote: > The Apache Commons team is pleased to announce the release of version > 1.5.5 of Commons Pool. Commons Pool provides a general > purpose object pooling API, an im