To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-javaflow has an issue affecting its community integration.
This is
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-validate has an issue affecting its community
integrat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-lang3 has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "UsingNexus" page has been changed by sebbapache.
The comment on this change is: Profile is test-deploy not local-deploy.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus?action=diff&rev1=
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 07:00
> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org; rat-...@incubator.apache.org;
> dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Future of RAT
>
> On 2010-08-10, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>
> > H
From: Nick Burch
To: retre...@apache.org
Reply-To: retre...@apache.org
Subject: Apache Retreat in Hursley, UK - 17-19th September
Hi All
Just a reminder that our next Apache Retreat will be in Hursley in the
UK, from the 17th - 19th September. That's a little over a month away
now!
If you're an
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
>
> WDYT?
I agree with others who've said RAT should consider going TLP.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
On Aug 10, 2010, at 7:03 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Stefan,
However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why
not
have a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing
anyone on the team that would be able to?
Jochen has sure be joking here. Th
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> If
> there will ever be a migration to a new license like ASL 3 or a
> another change of the header policy, then RAT will likely play a very
> important part in the process.
There's also an SPDX spec coming to describe the licensing in
pro
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 09:58, ant elder wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
> wrote:
>
>> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not have
>> a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing anyone on
>> the team that wou
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not have a
> RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing anyone on the
> team that would be able to? Hen files them all the time (well he used
Hi Stefan,
>> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not
>> have a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing
>> anyone on the team that would be able to?
>
> Jochen has sure be joking here. The team list he pointed at contains at
> least two curren
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-io-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This iss
On 2010-08-10, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> However, I'm not sure I get the whole reasoning below RE: TLP? Why not
> have a RAT TLP? The overhead of filing board reports and not knowing
> anyone on the team that would be able to?
Jochen has sure be joking here. The team list he pointed at c
Hi Jochen,
First off, congrats on even sending this email. I've often wondered by RAT is
still lingering in the Incubator when it's been pretty much widely used for a
long time, has a functional community, and keeps plugging forward with its
mission. So, first off, +1 to getting out of the Incu
On Aug 10, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> The question is: What's the target? RAT is way too small for an
> independent project. And I cannot imagine anybody of the current
> committers writing board reports. To me, a Rat TLP is no option. So we
> have the second possibility: Put it u
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having just published a release of Apache RAT with the "-incubating"
> label, I'd though it is time to discuss the future of RAT. RAT is an
> incubator project since 18 months. It is not an overly busy project:
> The occasional fea
On 10 August 2010 12:31, wrote:
> Author: jcarman
> Date: Tue Aug 10 11:31:38 2010
> New Revision: 983933
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983933&view=rev
> Log:
> Reverting "generification" of toMap() method in ArrayUtils.
However, the changes to ArrayUtilsTest seem to have reverted ot
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "UsingNexus" page has been changed by sebbapache.
The comment on this change is: Manual method for creating an SVN tag.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus?action=diff&rev1=12
FYI, I have reverted the offensive code. I do not have the time (nor
the desire) to discuss every little commit I make ad-nauseum.
ConstructorUtils fails to compile in trunk right now, btw.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:52 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 August 2010 10:42, Julien Aymé wrote:
>> 2010/8/10
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for
change notification.
The "UsingNexus" page has been changed by sebbapache.
The comment on this change is: Parent Pom defines test-deploy profile.
http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus?action=diff&rev1=1
This is really a question for the Commons User list - please subscribe
and ask there:
http://commons.apache.org/net/mail-lists.html
On 10 August 2010 12:08, Kathiresan Jeyapandian
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I need to download/access the old files first in the FTP server.
>
> I'm using org.apache.co
Hi all,
I need to download/access the old files first in the FTP server.
I'm using org.apache.commons.net.ftp library to connect to the FTP server.
I'm not sure how to sort the files in the FTP server by created date OR
modified date ???
I just wanted to process the list of files by old
Hi Christian,
+) works on Mac OS X 10.6 and java 1.6.0_20 from SVN tag
+) IntelliJ complained about a few JavaDoc & PMD issues but only minor stuff
+) RELEASE-NOTES.txt contains wrong version number
[X] +1 release it
[ ] +0 go ahead I don't care
[ ] -1 no, do not release it because
Cheers,
S
This is really a question for the Commons User list - please subscribe
and ask there:
http://commons.apache.org/net/mail-lists.html
On 10 August 2010 11:46, Kathiresan Jeyapandian
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I need to download/access the old files first in the FTP server.
>
> I'm using org.apache.com
Forgot one possible issue: Currently, RAT has its own mailing lists,
which would be unusual for Commons. My personal choice would be to
leave this as it is, but that's of course also subject to discussion.
Jochen
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having just pub
On 2010-08-10, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Site:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/compress/1.1/RC1/
Talks about 1.0 being the latest release at several places, easy to be
fixed later and indepent of the release.
> Binaries:
and sources
> https://repository.apache.org/content/reposit
Hi all,
I need to download/access the old files first in the FTP server.
I'm using org.apache.commons.net.ftp library to connect to the FTP server.
I'm not sure how to sort the files in the FTP server by created date OR
modified date ???
I just wanted to process the list of files by old
On 9 August 2010 07:08, wrote:
> Author: guixl
> Date: Mon Aug 9 06:08:05 2010
> New Revision: 983529
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=983529&view=rev
> Log:
> add get 4 more dependency jar files content in getDept.xml
>
> Modified:
> commons/sandbox/gsoc/2010/scxml-eclipse/trunk/get
Hi,
having just published a release of Apache RAT with the "-incubating"
label, I'd though it is time to discuss the future of RAT. RAT is an
incubator project since 18 months. It is not an overly busy project:
The occasional feature request, which is handled, a bug report from
time to time, and s
On 10 August 2010 05:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Commons Compress 1.1 is available for testing :-) Please have a look
> at it and vote.
>
> Note: this release has been made with Nexus and the new process described
> here:
> http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
>
> Tag:
>
> ht
Hi,
[x] +1 release it
Tested with commons-compress-1.1-src.tar.gz (SHA1:
eb2ae3125bae678a1615c0016e9bf7518771f26a) on Linux with Sun Java
1.6.0_16. Builds, passes all tests, and integrates well with Apache
Tika.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
On 10 August 2010 10:42, Julien Aymé wrote:
> 2010/8/10 sebb :
>> On 9 August 2010 23:44, James Carman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:32 AM, sebb wrote:
Why not split the code into two methods:
public static Map toMap(Map.Entry[] array)
and
public static Map toMap
2010/8/10 sebb :
> On 9 August 2010 23:44, James Carman wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:32 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> Why not split the code into two methods:
>>>
>>> public static Map toMap(Map.Entry[] array)
>>> and
>>> public static Map toMap(Class keyType, Class
>>> valueType, Object[][] array)
On 9 August 2010 23:44, James Carman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 7:32 AM, sebb wrote:
>> Why not split the code into two methods:
>>
>> public static Map toMap(Map.Entry[] array)
>> and
>> public static Map toMap(Class keyType, Class
>> valueType, Object[][] array)
>>
>
> So, what would tha
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-scxml-test has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme has an issue affecting its community
integration
40 matches
Mail list logo
