On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> We are in luck! Our friends in ComCom are creating a "tracklet" for
> us. We have three hours to work with, which we can cut up as we
> wish. So who wants to volunteer to speak?
>
> As I said above, I will volunteer for [math] and/or [dbcp]/[
We are in luck! Our friends in ComCom are creating a "tracklet" for
us. We have three hours to work with, which we can cut up as we
wish. So who wants to volunteer to speak?
As I said above, I will volunteer for [math] and/or [dbcp]/[pool]
with length "configurable." I would also be willing to
On 2010-07-01, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> From a Gump POV if you ever expect to do another JEXL 1.x release we
> should keep tracking the branch and help the JEXL and Cocoon devs
> figure out which way to go. If the branch is a dead-end anyway, we
> can as well stop tracking it and provide JEXL 1.1
On 3 July 2010 02:25, Phil Steitz wrote:
> Phil Steitz wrote:
>> setFactory belongs to the top level ObjectPool and KeyedObjectPool
>> interfaces. I would like to deprecate these methods uniformly (to
>> be removed in pool 2.0) - removing them from the top level
>> interfaces and deprecating all
