Re: [DAEMON] New release of daemon?

2010-02-17 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/17/2010 02:56 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> >> I can do that if you're OK with it. >> > > Go for it. OK done http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=911014 Niall >> Just wondering how you create the Daemon release - I gues

Re: svn commit: r910963 - /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt

2010-02-17 Thread sebb
On 17/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:56 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 17/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:36 PM, sebb wrote: > >> > On 17/02/2010, nia...@apache.org wrote: > >> >> Author: niallp > >> >> Date: Wed Feb 17 13:19:59 2010

Re: [DAEMON] New release of daemon?

2010-02-17 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/17/2010 02:56 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: I can do that if you're OK with it. Go for it. Just wondering how you create the Daemon release - I guess you have to generate the native bits, but then what? - do you use Ant or Maven to package it up. There is currently no way to package the

Re: svn commit: r910963 - /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt

2010-02-17 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:56 PM, sebb wrote: > On 17/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:36 PM, sebb wrote: >>  > On 17/02/2010, nia...@apache.org wrote: >>  >> Author: niallp >>  >>  Date: Wed Feb 17 13:19:59 2010 >>  >>  New Revision: 910963 >>  >> >>  >>  URL: http:/

Re: [DAEMON] New release of daemon?

2010-02-17 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > I'll tag 1.0.2 and propose a vote this Friday (Feb 19th) > Any objections? I made a few minor changes to the maven/ant build files. There are currently Ant, Maven 1 and Maven 2 builds for Daemon. I think we should get rid of the Maven 1 buil

Re: svn commit: r910963 - /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt

2010-02-17 Thread sebb
On 17/02/2010, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:36 PM, sebb wrote: > > On 17/02/2010, nia...@apache.org wrote: > >> Author: niallp > >> Date: Wed Feb 17 13:19:59 2010 > >> New Revision: 910963 > >> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910963&view=rev > >> Log:

Re: svn commit: r910963 - /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt

2010-02-17 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 1:36 PM, sebb wrote: > On 17/02/2010, nia...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: niallp >>  Date: Wed Feb 17 13:19:59 2010 >>  New Revision: 910963 >> >>  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910963&view=rev >>  Log: >>  Update copyright year to 2010 >> >>  Modified: >>     comm

Re: svn commit: r910963 - /commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt

2010-02-17 Thread sebb
On 17/02/2010, nia...@apache.org wrote: > Author: niallp > Date: Wed Feb 17 13:19:59 2010 > New Revision: 910963 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=910963&view=rev > Log: > Update copyright year to 2010 > > Modified: > commons/proper/daemon/trunk/NOTICE.txt > > Modified: commons/

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Lang -

2010-02-17 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=284999&projectId=2634 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 17 Feb 2010 04:32:45 -0800 Finished at: Wed 17 Feb 2010 04:34:07 -0800 Total time: 1m 21s Build Trigger: Schedule B

Re: [DAEMON] New release of daemon?

2010-02-17 Thread Mladen Turk
I'll tag 1.0.2 and propose a vote this Friday (Feb 19th) Any objections? Regards -- ^TM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Lang -

2010-02-17 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=284973&projectId=2634 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Wed 17 Feb 2010 03:32:07 -0800 Finished at: Wed 17 Feb 2010 03:33:55 -0800 Total time: 1m 47s Build Trigger: Schedule B