Re: [digester] help on graduating at-digester sandbox to current implementation

2010-01-24 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Sebb, thanks a *lot* for your review, I'll start working on fixes asap!!! And no, I didn't have the need to modify the digester original code, I just added the 'annotations' package. Thank once again, best regards, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:59 AM,

Re: [digester] help on graduating at-digester sandbox to current implementation

2010-01-24 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I'm writing you because I really need your help on graduating my effort > spent on sandbox about the digester: I finally terminated porting my old > stuff[1] on the sandbox and implemented some test cases that show how to use

Re: [digester] help on graduating at-digester sandbox to current implementation

2010-01-24 Thread sebb
On 25/01/2010, sebb wrote: > On 24/01/2010, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > Hi all guys, > > I'm writing you because I really need your help on graduating my effort > > spent on sandbox about the digester: I finally terminated porting my old > > stuff[1] on the sandbox and implemented some test

Re: [digester] help on graduating at-digester sandbox to current implementation

2010-01-24 Thread sebb
On 24/01/2010, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I'm writing you because I really need your help on graduating my effort > spent on sandbox about the digester: I finally terminated porting my old > stuff[1] on the sandbox and implemented some test cases that show how to use > annotations

Re: [DBCP] Release process suggestion

2010-01-24 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 24/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > release-process.txt currently says: >> > >> > 7. Check out DBCP fully - i.e., trunk, branches, tags. >> > >> > 8. From the top level of the checkout, execute >> > svn cp trunk branches/DBCP_1_3_x_BRANCH >> > svn c

Re: [math] Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-01-24 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Gump a écrit : >> To whom it may engage... >> >> This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For >> more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, >> and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. >> >> Project commons-math has

Re: [math] Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-01-24 Thread Ted Dunning
Standard practice is to include two tests. One is for development purposes and human inspection. That is where the truly non-deterministic test should go. The other test is for automated use and injects a random number generator with a known seed into the class under test. The test results shou

Re: [digester] help on graduating at-digester sandbox to current implementation

2010-01-24 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Tommaso :) thank for your interest on at-digester, your help is more than appreciated!!! all the best, Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: > Hi Simone, > I'm not a Commons committer but I can try to help you with your needs >

Re: [digester] help on graduating at-digester sandbox to current implementation

2010-01-24 Thread Tommaso Teofili
Hi Simone, I'm not a Commons committer but I can try to help you with your needs regarding code and design, since I've already used your at-digester with some UIMA components I developed. Cheers, Tommaso 2010/1/24 Simone Tripodi > Hi all guys, > I'm writing you because I really need your help on

[digester] help on graduating at-digester sandbox to current implementation

2010-01-24 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys, I'm writing you because I really need your help on graduating my effort spent on sandbox about the digester: I finally terminated porting my old stuff[1] on the sandbox and implemented some test cases that show how to use annotations on pojos. I need your help on: - reviewing the desig

Re: [codec] 1.4.1

2010-01-24 Thread Julius Davies
Thanks! Exactly the kind of direction I'm looking for! yours, Julius On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:13 AM, sebb wrote: > On 24/01/2010, Julius Davies wrote: >> Hi, >> >>  If anyone has any advice on how I can improve the patch I submitted >>  for CODEC-89, or perhaps I can improve on Sebb's patch

Re: [DBCP] Release process suggestion

2010-01-24 Thread sebb
On 24/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > release-process.txt currently says: > > > > 7. Check out DBCP fully - i.e., trunk, branches, tags. > > > > 8. From the top level of the checkout, execute > > svn cp trunk branches/DBCP_1_3_x_BRANCH > > svn commit -m "Created 1.3.

Re: [DBCP] Release process suggestion

2010-01-24 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > release-process.txt currently says: > > 7. Check out DBCP fully - i.e., trunk, branches, tags. > > 8. From the top level of the checkout, execute > svn cp trunk branches/DBCP_1_3_x_BRANCH > svn commit -m "Created 1.3.x compatibility release branch." > (where x is the f

Re: [codec] 1.4.1

2010-01-24 Thread sebb
On 24/01/2010, Julius Davies wrote: > Hi, > > If anyone has any advice on how I can improve the patch I submitted > for CODEC-89, or perhaps I can improve on Sebb's patch, I am more than > happy to try. > I think the first thing that needs to be done is to improve the unit tests - see CODEC-93

[DBCP] Release process suggestion

2010-01-24 Thread sebb
release-process.txt currently says: 7. Check out DBCP fully - i.e., trunk, branches, tags. 8. From the top level of the checkout, execute svn cp trunk branches/DBCP_1_3_x_BRANCH svn commit -m "Created 1.3.x compatibility release branch." (where x is the final digit of the new r

Re: [MATH] Density functions for all continuous distributions gives rise to re-consider the HasDensity-interface

2010-01-24 Thread Phil Steitz
Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote: > I haven't added to the ContinuousDistribution-interface. I've only > added to the AbstractContinuousDistribution-class. The relevant patch > that I committed is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-332, so > no compatibility break should occur. Yes, so your pro

Re: [math] moving towards 2.1 release ?

2010-01-24 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hello, > > I wonder if we should release 2.1 soon. There have been many bugs fixed, > but there are still many bugs waiting for a fix. I know at least two > projects that are waiting for a new release. +1 for getting 2.1 out ASAP. I was thinking of proposing a 2.0.1 just t

RE: [math] moving towards 2.1 release ?

2010-01-24 Thread Larry Diamond
Hi. On MATH-323 (SemiVariance), I updated the code submission as we discussed. Please take a look - I think it's at a point where it can be reviewed for inclusion. Please let me know what you think Thank you very much Larry Diamond > Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 11:47:31 +0100 > From: luc.mai

Re: [MATH] Density functions for all continuous distributions gives rise to re-consider the HasDensity-interface

2010-01-24 Thread Mikkel Meyer Andersen
I haven't added to the ContinuousDistribution-interface. I've only added to the AbstractContinuousDistribution-class. The relevant patch that I committed is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-332, so no compatibility break should occur. 2010/1/24 Phil Steitz : > Mikkel Meyer Andersen wrote

[math] moving towards 2.1 release ?

2010-01-24 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hello, I wonder if we should release 2.1 soon. There have been many bugs fixed, but there are still many bugs waiting for a fix. I know at least two projects that are waiting for a new release. I have closed or postponed a few issues. Considering the 9 issues scheduled for 2.1, some of them could

[math] Re: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-math (in module apache-commons) failed

2010-01-24 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Gump a écrit : > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, > and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. > > Project commons-math has an issue affecting its commu