Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=269449&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 22:51:10 -0800
Finished at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 22:52:46 -0800
Total time: 1m 36s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=269381&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 20:33:52 -0800
Finished at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 20:35:24 -0800
Total time: 1m 31s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
sebb wrote:
> The method SharedPoolDataSource.getPooledConnectionAndInfo has the
> following code:
>
> synchronized (userKeys) {
> if (userKeys.containsKey(username)) {
> userKeys.remove(username);
> }
> }
>
> Why not jus
The method SharedPoolDataSource.getPooledConnectionAndInfo has the
following code:
synchronized (userKeys) {
if (userKeys.containsKey(username)) {
userKeys.remove(username);
}
}
Why not just use userKeys.remove(username)?
On 13/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 13/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> > On 13/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> > > Here is the output from
> > >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=268733&projectId=22
> > >
> > > I've rearranged it so the threads are in ConnectionStart order.
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=269278&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 15:23:03 -0800
Finished at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 15:24:43 -0800
Total time: 1m 40s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=269236&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 14:03:24 -0800
Finished at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 14:04:40 -0800
Total time: 1m 15s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=269201&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 12:57:32 -0800
Finished at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 12:58:57 -0800
Total time: 1m 24s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
On Jan 13, 2010, at 12:04 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 05:17 PM, Jack Cai wrote:
>>
>> I also reported a bunch of JIRAs against procrun and provided
>> corresponding fixes, back to a year ago. Can we also make a new
>> procrun release?
>>
>
> Sure, it'll be part of that release.
> I
On 13/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 13/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> > Here is the output from
> >
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=268733&projectId=22
> >
> > I've rearranged it so the threads are in ConnectionStart order.
> > I moved ConnectionStart to the beginnin
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=269069&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 07:31:21 -0800
Finished at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 07:32:41 -0800
Total time: 1m 20s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=269039&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 06:18:53 -0800
Finished at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 06:20:47 -0800
Total time: 1m 53s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Bui
GOP and GKOP both use the following idiom in several places to check
to see if an instance has been allocated to a thread:
synchronized (this) {
// Make sure allocate hasn't already assigned an object
// in a different thread or permitted a new object to be created
if (latch.getPair() == null
sebb wrote:
> Here is the output from
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=268733&projectId=22
>
> I've rearranged it so the threads are in ConnectionStart order.
> I moved ConnectionStart to the beginning, added the Thread number at
> the end (dropping irrelevant stuff
On 13/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> Here is the output from
>
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=268733&projectId=22
>
> I've rearranged it so the threads are in ConnectionStart order.
> I moved ConnectionStart to the beginning, added the Thread number at
> the end (dro
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=268984&projectId=22
Build statistics:
State: Ok
Previous Build: No previous build.
Started at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 03:31:32 -0800
Finished at: Wed 13 Jan 2010 03:33:20 -0800
Total time: 1m 48s
Build Trigger: Sc
16 matches
Mail list logo
