[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP - Java 5 - default ant buildDefinition

2010-01-11 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=268145&projectId=2624 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous Build: No previous build. Started at: Mon 11 Jan 2010 17:30:17 -0800 Finished at: Mon 11 Jan 2010 17:30:36 -0800 Total time: 18s Build Trigger:

RE: [lang] Divesting the commons.lang.math package

2010-01-11 Thread Gary Gregory
> -- it is the foundation of a math library. I have to disagree on this point. An application can use Fractions instead of a doubles, if you can deal with the API usage compared to operators. This what we (in a different century, when I worked for a Smalltalk vendor) did in Smalltalk for ALL no

Re: [lang] Divesting the commons.lang.math package

2010-01-11 Thread Paul Benedict
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > Divest? I object to removing Fraction from [lang], as its a very core > concept tat is missing from the JDK. And thee are many users who would just > want Fraction and none of the rest of the [math] library. Having people to import Comm

Re: [lang] Divesting the commons.lang.math package

2010-01-11 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Divest? I object to removing Fraction from [lang], as its a very core concept tat is missing from the JDK. And thee are many users who would just want Fraction and none of the rest of the [math] library. The [lang] maths package is fo non-mathematicians. The [math] library is for serious mathe

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-11 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267969&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Mon 11 Jan 2010 09:31:04 -0800 Finished at: Mon 11 Jan 2010 09:32:29 -0800 Total time: 1m 25s Build Trigger: Schedule Bui

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-11 Thread sebb
On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote: > > Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill available: I assume this is from: http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=267625&projectId=22 > > > > Multithread test time = 489 ms. Threads: 20. L

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Phil Steitz wrote: > Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill available: > > Multithread test time = 489 ms. Threads: 20. Loops: 20. Hold time: > 200. Maxwait: 100. Done: 11. Did not run: 0. Failed: 9. expectError: > true > StartupDelay: 0. ConnectTime: 3. Runtime: 203. Loops:

Re: [dbcp] multipleThreads test

2010-01-11 Thread Phil Steitz
Posting the last failed build output while it is, umstill available: Multithread test time = 489 ms. Threads: 20. Loops: 20. Hold time: 200. Maxwait: 100. Done: 11. Did not run: 0. Failed: 9. expectError: true StartupDelay: 0. ConnectTime: 3. Runtime: 203. Loops: 1. State: Done. thrown: null.