Re: [lang] Builder code

2010-01-04 Thread Henri Yandell
Looked at the first one. I can't see how HashCodeBuilder might get involved with Annotations - or why you would implement an annotation as if it were a normal interface. So agreed that there's missing functionality, but it's functionality no one will miss. I'm thinking WONTFIX. On Mon, Jan 4, 201

Re: [DBCP] Fixes for next release

2010-01-04 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: >> sebb wrote: >> > It looks like the multi-threaded tests in TestSharedPoolDataSource >> > have the same problems as the ones in TestPerUserPoolDataSource. >> > >> > I'm currently testing to see if I can trigger a failure. >> > >> > I also not

Re: [DBCP] Fixes for next release

2010-01-04 Thread sebb
On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > It looks like the multi-threaded tests in TestSharedPoolDataSource > > have the same problems as the ones in TestPerUserPoolDataSource. > > > > I'm currently testing to see if I can trigger a failure. > > > > I also noticed that there are q

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-04 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265605&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 2 Jan 2010 22:03:16 -0800 Finished at: Sat 2 Jan 2010 22:05:38 -0800 Total time: 2m 21s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

Re: [DBCP] Fixes for next release

2010-01-04 Thread Phil Steitz
sebb wrote: > It looks like the multi-threaded tests in TestSharedPoolDataSource > have the same problems as the ones in TestPerUserPoolDataSource. > > I'm currently testing to see if I can trigger a failure. > > I also noticed that there are quite a few instances of "data hiding" - > i.e. using

[jelly] Jelly site slow update

2010-01-04 Thread Paul Libbrecht
Hello developers, I took a little time to try to rebuild the site so as to answer the question of Oliver Heger on the commons-users mailing-list and it turned out to be less painful then expected. I uploaded a preview of the rebuild at: http://www.activemath.org/~paul/tmp/jelly-sit

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-04 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265572&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 2 Jan 2010 19:38:31 -0800 Finished at: Sat 2 Jan 2010 19:41:07 -0800 Total time: 2m 35s Build Trigger: Schedule B

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-04 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265525&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 2 Jan 2010 16:54:19 -0800 Finished at: Sat 2 Jan 2010 16:56:18 -0800 Total time: 1m 58s Build Trigger: Schedule B

Re: [DBCP] Fixes for next release

2010-01-04 Thread sebb
On 04/01/2010, sebb wrote: > It looks like the multi-threaded tests in TestSharedPoolDataSource > have the same problems as the ones in TestPerUserPoolDataSource. > > I'm currently testing to see if I can trigger a failure. Yes, it fails. Looks to be the same problem - sleep(1) taking much long

[DBCP] Fixes for next release

2010-01-04 Thread sebb
It looks like the multi-threaded tests in TestSharedPoolDataSource have the same problems as the ones in TestPerUserPoolDataSource. I'm currently testing to see if I can trigger a failure. I also noticed that there are quite a few instances of "data hiding" - i.e. using the same name for a local

Sandbox request

2010-01-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi all guys and happy new year!!! Time ago I submitted a proposal[1] to extend the commons-digester with Java5 annotations and then submitted a patch[2] that has not been applied; since I continued working on it, and since December I'm a new ASF Cocoon3 Committer and PMC member, I requested a Lab[3

Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-04 Thread sebb
It seems there are further failure modes ;-) I'm intending to update the test case to provide further information on how the threads behave. On 02/01/2010, contin...@vmbuild.apache.org wrote: > Online report : > http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265454&projectId=22

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons DBCP -

2010-01-04 Thread contin...@vmbuild.apache.org
Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=265454&projectId=22 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Sat 2 Jan 2010 11:25:15 -0800 Finished at: Sat 2 Jan 2010 11:27:19 -0800 Total time: 2m 4s Build Trigger: Schedule Build

Re: RESULT: Failed [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4 - take three

2010-01-04 Thread sebb
On 03/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > sebb wrote: > > On 03/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> sebb wrote: > >> > On 03/01/2010, sebb wrote: > >> >> On 02/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> > sebb wrote: > >> >> > > On 01/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> >> > >> Phil Steitz wrote

[lang] Builder code

2010-01-04 Thread Henri Yandell
Noting that the builder package issues are the major 3.0 area of work remaining. http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&pid=12310481&fixfor=12311714&resolution=-1&sorter/field=summary&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=resolution&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=status&sorter/