Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > So Niall, whats next and please if there is anything I can help in let > me know about it. I was waiting for Donald to take the lead. Hes posted a couple of message about the vote which I responded to but he doesn't seem to be around m

Re: svn commit: r887821 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/xdocs/download_dbcp.xml

2009-12-07 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Niall Pemberton wrote: >> Phil, >> >> It might be easier (maintenance-wise) to generate two separate pages - >> one for each version. i.e. set the commons.release.version to "1.3", >> generate the download_dbcp.xml and then rename it to somethin

Re: Colt vs. Primitives

2009-12-07 Thread Ted Dunning
Bring them in! We will likely need them as well. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > maps. > > > On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > Which part did you care about? >> >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Benson Margulies > >wrote: >> >> Aha, you didn't take

Re: Colt vs. Primitives

2009-12-07 Thread Benson Margulies
maps. On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: Which part did you care about? On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Benson Margulies >wrote: Aha, you didn't take the part I care about most, but your grab of the jet stuff may help me grab the collections stuff. This is almost messy enoug

Re: Colt vs. Primitives

2009-12-07 Thread Ted Dunning
Which part did you care about? On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Aha, you didn't take the part I care about most, but your grab of the > jet stuff may help me grab the collections stuff. This is almost messy > enough for me to go back to coding from scratch from Knuth. > >

Re: Colt vs. Primitives

2009-12-07 Thread Benson Margulies
Aha, you didn't take the part I care about most, but your grab of the jet stuff may help me grab the collections stuff. This is almost messy enough for me to go back to coding from scratch from Knuth. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > It's in the module now called "matrix" - th

Re: Colt vs. Primitives

2009-12-07 Thread Jake Mannix
It's in the module now called "matrix" - the name "colt" is tradmarked by CERN, so we're not using that name as such. -jake On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I just checked this out and there is no colt in there. I got rev 888157. > > > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:04 PM,

Re: Colt vs. Primitives

2009-12-07 Thread Benson Margulies
I just checked this out and there is no colt in there. I got rev 888157. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/mahout/trunk is the overall > directory.  Colt is just below that.  I believe that the pom in the subdir > will build colt without

Re: Colt vs. Primitives

2009-12-07 Thread Ted Dunning
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/mahout/trunk is the overall directory. Colt is just below that. I believe that the pom in the subdir will build colt without the top-level, but you know more about maven than I do. On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Ted, I just figur

Re: Colt vs. Primitives

2009-12-07 Thread Benson Margulies
Ted, I just figured out why I should take you up on your offer. Where in svn is the Mahout fork? On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > Mahout has already sucked Colt in.  If you are interested in modernizing it, > that might be a good place to do it. > > We are committed to maintai

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2009-12-07 Thread commons-jelly-tags-fmt development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-12-07 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati

Re: [dbcp] 1.3/1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-12-07 Thread Mark Thomas
Phil Steitz wrote: > I am inclined to just do one VOTE +1 > There is also a recently opened documentation bug (DBCP-309) that I > do not see as a showstopper for this release, but would appreciate > feedback on the ticket and concurrence that we can push it to > 1.3.1/1.4.1. +1 Mark

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Niall, validation team, same here, I'm available :) Simo On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: > So Niall, whats next and please if there is anything I can help in let > me know about it. > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009

[dbcp] 1.3/1.4 RC1 available for review

2009-12-07 Thread Phil Steitz
I have prepared release candidates for DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. Please all interested parties have a look and test. If all goes well, I will kick off a release VOTE based on these artifacts in the next couple of days. I see these as really two sets of artifacts associated with one release, so I am incl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons to sponsor agimatec-validation incunbation

2009-12-07 Thread Mohammad Nour El-Din
So Niall, whats next and please if there is anything I can help in let me know about it. On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >> Niall, any update on the voting? > > The vote passed on Nov 24th: > > http://markmail.org/messa