Re: [vfs] JDK 1.5

On Nov 8, 2009, at 10:24 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: Guys, looking at Ralph's comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254 I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should still have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5. VFS 2.0 will be a major release and JDK 1

RE: [vfs] JDK 1.5

> -Original Message- > From: news [mailto:n...@ger.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible > Sent: Sunday, November 08, 2009 22:24 > To: dev@commons.apache.org > Subject: [vfs] JDK 1.5 > > Guys, > > looking at Ralph's comment in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254 > I am questio

RE: [vfs] JDK 1.5

Hi! > looking at Ralph's comment in > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254 > I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should > still > have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5. If it is just me, I'd be happy to drop 1.4 dependency - Past votes were declined. Prob

[vfs] JDK 1.5

Guys, looking at Ralph's comment in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-254 I am questionning myself, if there's any reason why vfs 2.0 should still have JDK 1.4 as requirement and not JDK 1.5. VFS 2.0 will be a major release and JDK 1.7 is years away to be used for our conservative customer

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

+1 Julien 2009/11/8 Dan Fabulich : > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs > errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. > > As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, >

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

+1 Oliver Dan Fabulich schrieb: This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, but I'm sti

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

Dan Fabulich a écrit : > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing > FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. There is a new (very minor) checkstyle error in this version. This is not blocking. +1 Luc

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

+1 Dan Fabulich wrote: > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs > errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. > > As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible > binary, but I'm

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

D'oh! Good catch... Oliver Heger wrote: I tried to build the sources on a JDK 1.5 and got the following errors: D:\data\projects\OpenSource\dbutils\commons-dbutils-1.3-src\src\java\org\apache\ commons\dbutils\wrappers\SqlNullCheckedResultSet.java:[216,53] cannot find symbol symbol : method

[VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC4

This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. In RC3 I accidentally added a dependency on Java 1.6 while fixing FindBugs errors; in RC4 I fixed that bug. As noted in earlier RCs, I believe 1.3 to be a backwards compatible binary, but I'm still only 99% sure of this; clirr rep

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

I tried to build the sources on a JDK 1.5 and got the following errors: D:\data\projects\OpenSource\dbutils\commons-dbutils-1.3-src\src\java\org\apache\ commons\dbutils\wrappers\SqlNullCheckedResultSet.java:[216,53] cannot find symbol symbol : method copyOf(byte[],int) location: class java.uti

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

+1 as before. Thanks a lot for doing all this. Julien 2009/11/8 Dan Fabulich : > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > For RC3 I fixed the CheckStyle and FindBugs errors, except for the "bad > practice" bug of using getClass().getResourceAsStream(), which would > pr

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

+1 again Dan Fabulich wrote: > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > For RC3 I fixed the CheckStyle and FindBugs errors, except for the "bad > practice" bug of using getClass().getResourceAsStream(), which would > probably require an API change. > > As noted in ea

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community integrat

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme (in module commons-jelly) success, but with warnings.

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-jaxme contains errors. The current state of this projec

Re: [VOTE] Release of DbUtils 1.3 RC3

Dan Fabulich a écrit : > > This release includes support for Java5 generics and varargs. > > For RC3 I fixed the CheckStyle and FindBugs errors, except for the "bad > practice" bug of using getClass().getResourceAsStream(), which would > probably require an API change. Thanks for taking care of

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit (in module commons-jelly) success, but with warnings.

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-jelly-tags-xmlunit contains errors. The current state of this proj

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration-test (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community integrati