On Aug 22, 2009, at 8:13 AM, ohe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Sat Aug 22 15:13:31 2009
New Revision: 806862
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=806862&view=rev
Log:
[CONFIGURATION-393] Special treatment of collection properties when
cloning a BaseConfiguration.
Modified:
On Aug 22, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
I also see this failure sporadically on my local system. Could this
be a
timing issue?
Yes, it is. I also see it occasionally. I have been able to make it go
away on the machine of mine where it seems to happen most often.
Ralph
The commons-codec team is pleased to announce the Commons Codec 1.4 release!
The codec package contains simple encoder and decoders for various formats such
as Base64 and Hexadecimal. In addition to these widely used encoders and
decoders, the codec package also maintains a collection of phoneti
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Michael Wooten wrote:
> What version of Java will IO 2.0 be targeting? As I understand it, the next
> version will target Java 5 compatibility, in which case the file monitoring
> functionality may be beneficial to users who will not be transitioning to
> Java 7 soo
contin...@vmbuild.apache.org wrote:
> Online report :
> http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=208169&projectId=161
>
> Build statistics:
> State: Failed
> Previous State: Failed
> Started at: Sat 22 Aug 2009 09:32:06 -0700
> Finished at: Sat 22 Aug 2009 09:34:01 -
Online report :
http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=208169&projectId=161
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Sat 22 Aug 2009 09:32:06 -0700
Finished at: Sat 22 Aug 2009 09:34:01 -0700
Total time: 1m 55s
Build Trigger: Schedule
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration.
Th
Now that 2.0 is to bed, what is the status of integrating MTJ into commons
math?
> Well, if you're going to make a jump, why go to something that's EOSL very
> soon?
For me, JDK 1.6 would be fine too.
But, I'd say this is just a minor issue as the main things one will notice
(generics, enhanced for syntax) are there with JDK 1.5.
Are there any API changes critical for VFS to
