Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread Henri Yandell
+1 to remove. On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:32 AM, sebb wrote: > LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. > > The annotations were defined with Runtime retention. > > Although the annotation jar is not needed to run applications, it > turns out that the Sun Java 1.5 compiler reports

Re: [CONTINUUM] Add JEXL? Java version?

2009-08-20 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:46 AM, sebb wrote: > Not sure who is looking after Continuum for Commons, but it might be > useful to add Jexl 2.0 to the list. > Yes (and its time to move the 2.0 branch to trunk now, with 1.x being a branch, IMO). I don't remember fiddling with continuum for Commons m

Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread Holger Hoffstaette
On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:32:22 +0100, sebb wrote: > LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. Please also see: http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/ I remember vaguely that there were some semantic changes esp. wrt. the "itself" designator since the original JCIP release. -h

Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread Stephen Colebourne
LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. The annotations were defined with Runtime retention. Although the annotation jar is not needed to run applications, it turns out that the Sun Java 1.5 compiler reports an error if the jar is not present. [Java 1.6 only issues a warning]

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-compress-test (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-08-20 Thread commons-compress development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-compress-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-lang3 (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-08-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-lang3 has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

RE: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread Gary Gregory
> -Original Message- > From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de] > Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 1:03 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations > > sebb schrieb: > > LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. > > > > The annot

Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread Oliver Heger
sebb schrieb: LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. The annotations were defined with Runtime retention. Although the annotation jar is not needed to run applications, it turns out that the Sun Java 1.5 compiler reports an error if the jar is not present. [Java 1.6 only is

[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-configuration (in module apache-commons) failed

2009-08-20 Thread Gump
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

Re: [LANG] Suggestions For New Features

2009-08-20 Thread James Carman
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Michael Wooten wrote: > I was assuming I would use the fact that compareTo() returns 0 for the case > of equality. My original assumption was the test would be as simple as > ((value.compareTo(start) >= 0) && (value.compareTo(end) <= 0)).  However, as > the document

Re: [LANG] Suggestions For New Features

2009-08-20 Thread Michael Wooten
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:31 AM, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> - sizeInRange(int minSize, int maxSize, String string, String message) > >> - throws an IllegalArgumentException stating (message + value) when > >> the length of the provi

Re: [io] File Listener/Monitor

2009-08-20 Thread Torsten Curdt
There already is commons-jci-fam. Given these two facts I am not sure it makes sense to include in IO 2.0. cheers -- Torsten On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 22:40, Michael Wooten wrote: > What version of Java will IO 2.0 be targeting? As I understand it, the next > version will target Java 5 compatibili

Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread sebb
On 20/08/2009, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > sebb wrote at Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 11:32: > > > > LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. > > > > The annotations were defined with Runtime retention. > > > > Although the annotation jar is not needed to run applic

[CONTINUUM] Add JEXL? Java version?

2009-08-20 Thread sebb
Not sure who is looking after Continuum for Commons, but it might be useful to add Jexl 2.0 to the list. Also, the builds all seem to use Java 1.6, however no Commons components actually require Java 1.6 yet. Java 1.6 allows certain constructs which cause errors in Java 1.5, so defaulting to 1.6

Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Sebb, sebb wrote at Donnerstag, 20. August 2009 11:32: > LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. > > The annotations were defined with Runtime retention. > > Although the annotation jar is not needed to run applications, it > turns out that the Sun Java 1.5 compiler repor

Re: [LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:32 AM, sebb wrote: > LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. > > The annotations were defined with Runtime retention. > > Although the annotation jar is not needed to run applications, it > turns out that the Sun Java 1.5 compiler reports an error if t

[LANG] JCIP Annotations

2009-08-20 Thread sebb
LANG trunk currently includes some use of JCIP annotations. The annotations were defined with Runtime retention. Although the annotation jar is not needed to run applications, it turns out that the Sun Java 1.5 compiler reports an error if the jar is not present. [Java 1.6 only issues a warning]