>> Thanks for looking at these patch(es) :-)
>> Can you add svn props to the above files and fix your client config?
Yes, sorry. I have done so now and fixed all the files sebb suggested
(checked it too with svn propset -R svn:eol-style native * )
However doing this on the files
> svn ps svn:eo
Alternatively you might consider moving all components to the new
groupId "org.apache.commons" and using maven's relocation
(http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-relocation.html) to ensure
backward compatibility.
SaM
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:58 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 15/06/2009, Jörg Schaible
On 15/06/2009, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> > sebb a écrit :
> >> Which is the correct style for Maven2 releases?
> >>
> >> org.apache.commons
> >> commons-component
> >>
> >> or
> >>
> >> commons-component
> >> commons-component
> >>
> >> There are recent examples
Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> sebb a écrit :
>> Which is the correct style for Maven2 releases?
>>
>> org.apache.commons
>> commons-component
>>
>> or
>>
>> commons-component
>> commons-component
>>
>> There are recent examples of both.
>
> I would say:
>
> - new components use "org.apache.commons
sebb wrote:
> The JEXL SVN repos include copies of the Eclipse .project and .classpath
> files.
>
> This is a actually a nuisance for Eclipse users, as these files tend
> to contain items which are specific to the actual installation. For
> example, .project may contain additional natures, and .c
Phil Steitz wrote:
Pool 1.5 contained a nasty regression (POOL-144) that has been fixed.
Version 1.5.1 contains a fix for this bug.
The tag is here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_1_RC1/
The release distribution files are here:
http://people.apache.org/~pste
On 15/06/2009, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:45 PM, wrote:
> > Author: grobmeier
> > Date: Sat Jun 13 17:45:23 2009
> > New Revision: 784442
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784442&view=rev
> > Log:
> > JEXL-55: Bean & ant-ish like assignment, Ternary operat
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
sebb a écrit :
Which is the correct style for Maven2 releases?
org.apache.commons
commons-component
or
commons-component
commons-component
There are recent examples of both.
I would say:
- new components use "org.apache.commons"
- already released components keep the same groupId. If the
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 1:45 PM, wrote:
> Author: grobmeier
> Date: Sat Jun 13 17:45:23 2009
> New Revision: 784442
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784442&view=rev
> Log:
> JEXL-55: Bean & ant-ish like assignment, Ternary operator, Exception handling
> revisited,
> ScriptFactory, Expres
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:14 PM, sebb wrote:
> The JEXL SVN repos include copies of the Eclipse .project and .classpath
> files.
>
> This is a actually a nuisance for Eclipse users, as these files tend
> to contain items which are specific to the actual installation. For
> example, .project may co
The JEXL SVN repos include copies of the Eclipse .project and .classpath files.
This is a actually a nuisance for Eclipse users, as these files tend
to contain items which are specific to the actual installation. For
example, .project may contain additional natures, and .classpath may
also well va
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:03 PM, sebb wrote:
> Which is the correct style for Maven2 releases?
>
> org.apache.commons
> commons-component
>
> or
>
> commons-component
> commons-component
>
Depends.
We started off with "commons-component". No one has taken on
relocating old components -- there is
Which is the correct style for Maven2 releases?
org.apache.commons
commons-component
or
commons-component
commons-component
There are recent examples of both.
Also, I've noticed that some pom.xml files (e.g. compress, proxy)
don't include a for the current component; presumably that
is an ove
Henri,
just applied the patch.
Additionally I have removed the M1 and the ant build as already
announced on this list.
Thanks for contribution!
Christian
-- Forwarded message --
From: Henrib
Date: Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Is JEXL an active project ?
To: dev@commo
I'm just some random user, but I have no opposition to including a framework
in Lang. For projects that I have worked on, I found a very useful pattern
for frameworks like this that have a fairly fixed set of operations.
I usually like to define an interface, which in this case could be something
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-jelly-tags-fmt-test has an issue affecting its community
integrat
I Created JEXL-56 to correct the mistakes I introduced with JEXL-55; the
patch is way simpler to review and applies cleanly.
The patch attached also empties Coercion.ava & LogManager.java; these two
classes can be 'svn del'-eted.
The Interpreter.java modifications are cosmetic/formatting; it was
pedrofaundez...@terra.es wrote:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/
has outdated tarbals.
They must be removed to not confuse users or developers and the
process that creates them may be started again if there are users that
rely on them
Ahora tambi�n puedes accede
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/nightly/commons-dbcp/
has outdated tarbals.
They must be removed to not confuse users or developers and the
process that creates them may be started again if there are users that
rely on them
Ahora tambi�n puedes acceder a tu correo Terra desde el m�vil.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org.
Project commons-configuration-test has an issue affecting its community
integrati
21 matches
Mail list logo
