[g...@vmgump]: Project commons-email (in module apache-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at gene...@gump.apache.org. Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue

[VOTE] Release pool 1.5.1

Pool 1.5 contained a nasty regression (POOL-144) that has been fixed. Version 1.5.1 contains a fix for this bug. The tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/pool/tags/POOL_1_5_1_RC1/ The release distribution files are here: http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/pool-1.5.1-RC1/

[Commons Wiki] Update of "CommonsCommitters/ReleasesInProgress" by DennisLundberg

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by DennisLundberg: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CommonsCommitters/ReleasesInProgress The comment on the change is: Logging 1.1 was released a long

[continuum] BUILD SUCCESSFUL: Commons - Commons Pool -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=195054&projectId=116 Build statistics: State: Ok Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 13 Jun 2009 12:47:45 -0700 Finished at: Sat 13 Jun 2009 12:50:00 -0700 Total time: 2m 15s Build Trigger: Forced Buil

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Commons - Commons Pool -

Online report : http://vmbuild.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=195049&projectId=116 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Sat 13 Jun 2009 11:37:32 -0700 Finished at: Sat 13 Jun 2009 11:40:05 -0700 Total time: 2m 33s Build Trigger: Schedule Bu

Re: Is JEXL an active project ?

I just applied the patch. Henri, please make sure to make smaller patches :-) This one was quite hard to review :-) Hope I got it all in correctly, you may want to have a look. Thanks guy! Christian On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> I've updated https://issues.apache.o

Re: [configuration] Configuration 2.0 - Persistence

Ralph Goers schrieb: On Jun 12, 2009, at 1:32 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: I may have some time to work on the experimental branch this summer. There is a fundamental point I'd like to address, that's the persistence of the configurations. As described in CONFIGURATION-311 I'd like to add two

Re: [jexl] Remove Maven 1 support from 2.0 branch?

On 13/06/2009, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi there, > > just thought it would be nice removing M1 support from the 2.0 branch, > which deals with java 5 and such. I don't think it makes any sense to > support M1. > > If you agree, I'll open an issue. I say just do it unless anyone complains

[jexl] Remove Maven 1 support from 2.0 branch?

Hi there, just thought it would be nice removing M1 support from the 2.0 branch, which deals with java 5 and such. I don't think it makes any sense to support M1. If you agree, I'll open an issue. Cheers, Christian - To unsubsc